2026 Ford F-250 Super Duty vs 2026 Toyota Tundra
Comparison Overview
The most significant numerical difference between the 2026 Ford F-250 Super Duty and the 2026 Toyota Tundra is the $4,415 MSRP gap, with the Tundra starting at $41,260 against the F-250's $45,675. Performance metrics show the F-250 asserting dominance with 405 hp and 445 lb-ft of torque, significantly outpacing the Tundra's 348 hp and 405 lb-ft of torque. Conversely, the Tundra offers a measurable efficiency advantage, achieving a combined 20 MPG, while specific MPG figures for the F-250 were not provided for direct comparison, though it is assumed to be lower given its heavy-duty classification. Dimensionally, the Tundra is slightly longer at 233.6 inches versus the F-250's 231.8 inches, and marginally wider at 80.2 inches. Both vehicles utilize a 10-speed shiftable automatic transmission and are equipped with rear-wheel drive for this comparison baseline.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2026 Toyota Tundra
The Toyota Tundra wins for commuters due to its better fuel economy metrics (20 combined MPG) compared to the larger F-250.
2026 Toyota Tundra
The Tundra's lower initial cost of $41,260 provides better immediate budget accessibility for family budgets.
2026 Ford F-250 Super Duty
The Ford F-250 offers superior power output, boasting 405 hp and 445 lb-ft of torque.
2026 Toyota Tundra
The Tundra provides a lower entry price point ($4,415 less than car1) for a capable truck platform.
Choose the Ford F-250 Super Duty if...
- Maximum engine output is required, evidenced by 405 hp and 445 lb-ft of torque.
- The utility of a higher-tier heavy-duty platform is prioritized over fuel economy.
- The base MSRP of $45,675 fits the budget for a truck with superior base horsepower ratings.
Choose the Toyota Tundra if...
- Operating costs are critical, as the Tundra achieves a 20 combined MPG rating.
- A lower initial investment is necessary, with an MSRP of $41,260.
- A slightly longer body (233.6 inches vs. 231.8 inches) offers marginal length benefits.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford F-250 Super Duty | Toyota Tundra |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 231.8" | 233.6" |
| Width | 80.0" | 80.2" |
| Height | 78.9" | 78.0" |
| Wheelbase | 141.4" | 145.7" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Deactivation Switch | ✓ | — |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | — |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Front Headrests | 3 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | — |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | — | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | — | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | — | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | — | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | — | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | — | ✓ |
| Brake Assist | — | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | — | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | — | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 6.8 L | 3.4 L |
| Number of Cylinders | V8 | V6 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 405 hp @ 5000 rpm | 348 hp @ 5200 rpm |
| Torque | 445 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 405 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 24 |
| Camshaft Type | Overhead valves (OHV) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | — | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 10-speed shiftable automatic | 10-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | rear wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 0/0 mi. | 579.6/740.6 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34.0 gal. | 32.2 gal. |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | — | 18/23 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | — | 20 MPG |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Power Steering | ✓ | — |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Vanity Mirror | ✓ | — |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Push Button Start | — | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | — | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | — | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | — | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | — | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | — | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 8.0 in | 8.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 4 | 6 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | — | With Real Time Traffic |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | — | 3 months |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 2 | 4 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | — |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Keyless Entry | — | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 40.8 in. | 41.0 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 43.9 in. | 41.2 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 66.7 in. | 65.0 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 62.5 in. | 62.6 in. |
| Seat Material: Vinyl | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: 40-20-40 Split Bench | ✓ | — |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Manual | — |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
| Seat Material: Cloth | — | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | — | ✓ |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | — | 38.5 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | — | 33.3 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | — | 63.4 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | — | 60.5 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Steel | — |
| Wheel Cover Type | ✓ | — |
| Wheel Diameter | 17 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | LT245/75R | P245/75R18 |
| Spare Tire Type | Full Size Matching | Full Size Non-Matching |
| Spare Tire Location | Underbody Mounted | Underbody Mounted |
| Wheel Material | — | Steel |
| Wheel Size | — | 18 x 8.0 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | Independent |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 2 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | — | 2 yr./ 25000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2026 Ford F-250 Super Duty and 2026 Toyota Tundra.
What is the performance difference in standard horsepower between the two trucks?
The 2026 Ford F-250 Super Duty has a measurable power advantage with 405 hp, whereas the 2026 Toyota Tundra produces 348 hp. This 57 hp difference means the F-250 is substantially more potent in acceleration and towing situations.
How does the base pricing structure compare for these two 2026 models?
The Toyota Tundra is more affordable at its starting MSRP of $41,260. The Ford F-250 Super Duty begins at $45,675, resulting in a $4,415 price differential favoring the Tundra.
Are there any differences in drivetrain components, such as fuel type or transmission?
Both base models specified use regular unleaded fuel and are equipped with a 10-speed shiftable automatic transmission. Furthermore, both vehicles are configured with rear-wheel drive for this baseline comparison.
Which truck offers better fuel efficiency for daily driving?
The Toyota Tundra is explicitly rated with 20 combined MPG (18 city/23 highway MPG), suggesting better efficiency for daily commutes than the heavier-duty Ford F-250.
How do the exterior dimensions stack up between the F-250 and the Tundra?
The Tundra is marginally larger in length and width, measuring 233.6 inches long and 80.2 inches wide, compared to the F-250's 231.8 inches in length and 80.0 inches in width. Conversely, the F-250 is taller at 78.9 inches compared to the Tundra's 78.0 inches.
What is the core mechanical advantage that justifies the F-250's higher price?
The F-250's higher MSRP correlates directly with its higher torque output of 445 lb-ft compared to the Tundra's 405 lb-ft, indicating superior low-end pulling capability inherent to its heavy-duty configuration.
More Mid-Range Trucks ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool