2025 Volvo S60 vs 2026 Ford Mustang

Volvo S60

$42,600 ยท Sedan

vs
Ford Mustang

$32,320 ยท Coupe

Comparison Overview

The most striking numerical divergence between the 2025 Volvo S60 and the 2026 Ford Mustang is the MSRP, with the Mustang undercutting the S60 by $10,280 ($32,320 vs $42,600). This price difference supports the Mustang's superior raw performance metrics: it generates 315 hp and 350 lb-ft of torque, significantly outpacing the S60's 247 hp and 258 lb-ft. Conversely, the S60 offers better efficiency, achieving 30 combined MPG compared to the Mustang's 26 combined MPG. In dimensions, the Mustang is slightly longer at 189.4 inches versus 188.1 inches, and it offers marginally more cargo space at 13.5 cu ft compared to the S60's 11.6 cu ft. While both require premium fuel, the S60 prioritizes efficiency and space efficiency, whereas the Mustang emphasizes power and a lower entry cost.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

๐Ÿš— Best for Commuters

2025 Volvo S60

The Volvo S60 wins for commuting due to its 30 combined MPG, offering 4 MPG more than the Mustang.

๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ‘งโ€๐Ÿ‘ฆ Best for Families

2026 Ford Mustang

Despite being a coupe, the Mustang offers a slightly larger cargo capacity at 13.5 cu ft compared to the S60's 11.6 cu ft.

๐ŸŽ๏ธ Best for Enthusiasts

2026 Ford Mustang

The 2026 Ford Mustang appeals more to enthusiasts by delivering a substantial advantage of 315 hp and 350 lb-ft of torque.

๐Ÿ’ฐ Best Value

2026 Ford Mustang

The Mustang offers substantially more horsepower (315 hp vs 247 hp) for a price premium that is $10,280 lower than the S60.

Choose the Volvo S60 if...

  • Fuel economy is paramount, as the S60 achieves 30 combined MPG versus 26 combined MPG for the Mustang.
  • A more traditionally sized sedan platform is preferred, offering 27/36 MPG for city/highway driving.
  • The buyer values standard front-wheel drive stability over the performance-oriented rear-wheel drive setup.

Choose the Ford Mustang if...

  • Maximum accessible power is the goal, as the Mustang boasts 315 hp and 350 lb-ft of torque.
  • The initial purchase price needs to be minimized, given the Mustang's $32,320 MSRP compared to $42,600 for the S60.
  • A driver prefers the dynamics of a coupe body style with a slightly greater cargo volume of 13.5 cu ft.

Key Dimensions

Dimension Volvo S60 Ford Mustang
Length 188.1" 189.4"
Width 72.8" 75.4"
Height 56.6" 55.0"
Wheelbase 113.1" 107.0"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Volvo Ford
Blind Spot Monitor โœ“ โœ“
Lane Departure Warning โœ“ โœ“
Lane Keeping Assist System โœ“ โœ“
Rear Cross Traffic Alert โœ“ โœ“
Driver Attention Alert โœ“ โœ“
Pre-Collision Safety System โœ“ โœ“
Post-Collision Safety System โœ“ โœ“
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Front Head Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Rear Head Airbags โœ“ โ€”
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation โœ“ โ€”
Electronic Stability Control โœ“ โœ“
Traction Control System โœ“ โœ“
LATCH System โœ“ โœ“
Rear Door Child Safety Locks โœ“ โ€”
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes โœ“ โœ“
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes โœ“ โœ“
Brake Preparation System โœ“ โ€”
Brake Assist โœ“ โ€”
Tire Pressure Monitoring System โœ“ โœ“
Automatic Headlights โœ“ โœ“
Headlight Delay-Off โœ“ โœ“
LED Headlights โœ“ โœ“
Adaptive Headlights โœ“ โ€”
Daytime Running Lights โœ“ โœ“
Cornering Lights โœ“ โ€”
Front Fog Lights โœ“ โ€”
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors โœ“ โ€”
Front Headrests 2 2
Front Fixed Headrests โœ“ โ€”
Rear Headrests 3 โ€”
Rear Folding Headrests โœ“ โ€”
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt โœ“ โ€”
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) โœ“ โ€”
Engine Immobilizer โœ“ โœ“
Front Multi-Adjustable Headrests โ€” โœ“
Engine
Feature Volvo Ford
Base Engine Displacement 2.0 L 2.3 L
Number of Cylinders inline 4 inline 4
Base Engine Type mild hybrid gas
Horsepower 247 hp @ 5400 rpm 315 hp @ 5500 rpm
Torque 258 lb-ft @ 1800 rpm 350 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm
Number of Valves 16 16
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type โœ“ โœ“
Drive Train
Feature Volvo Ford
Transmission Type 8-speed shiftable automatic 10-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type front wheel drive rear wheel drive
Rear Differential Type โ€” Limited Slip
Fuel
Feature Volvo Ford
Fuel Type premium unleaded (recommended) premium unleaded (recommended)
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 27/36 MPG 22/33 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 30 MPG 26 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 429.3/572.4 mi. 352.0/528.0 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 15.9 gal. 16.0 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Volvo Ford
Push Button Start โœ“ โœ“
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Electric Power Steering โœ“ โœ“
Rear View Camera โœ“ โœ“
Rear Parking Sensors โœ“ โœ“
Cruise Control โœ“ โœ“
Universal Remote Transmitter โœ“ โ€”
Front Cupholders โœ“ โœ“
Rear Cupholders โœ“ โ€”
Front Door Pockets โœ“ โœ“
Rear Door Pockets โœ“ โ€”
Front Seatback Storage โœ“ โ€”
Leatherette Steering Wheel โœ“ โ€”
Dual Zone Climate Control โœ“ โœ“
Rear Ventilation Ducts โœ“ โ€”
Dual Vanity Mirrors โœ“ โœ“
Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror โœ“ โœ“
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors โœ“ โ€”
Leather Steering Wheel โ€” โœ“
Interior Air Filtration โ€” โœ“
In Car Entertainment
Feature Volvo Ford
Infotainment Display 9.0 in โ€”
AM/FM Stereo โœ“ โœ“
Stereo Power 220W โ€”
Speaker System 10 6
Android Auto (Wired) โœ“ โœ“
Apple CarPlay (Wired) โœ“ โœ“
USB Port โœ“ โœ“
USB Port with External Media Control โœ“ โœ“
Satellite Radio โœ“ โ€”
Satellite Radio Trial Period 3 months โ€”
Auxiliary Audio Input โ€” โœ“
Power Feature
Feature Volvo Ford
One-Touch Power Windows 4 2
Moonroof Type 1st Row Power Glass โ€”
Keyless Entry โœ“ โœ“
Heated Mirrors โœ“ โœ“
Frontseats
Feature Volvo Ford
Front Head Room 37.4 in. 37.6 in.
Front Leg Room 42.3 in. 44.5 in.
Front Shoulder Room 56.1 in. 56.3 in.
Front Hip Room 55.3 in. 54.9 in.
Seat Material: Leatherette โœ“ โ€”
Front Seat Type: Bucket โœ“ โœ“
Driver Seat Power Adjustments 8-way โ€”
Driver Seat Height Adjustment โœ“ โœ“
Driver Seat Lumbar Support Power โ€”
Driver Seat Memory Settings 2 โ€”
Passenger Seat Power Adjustments 8-way โ€”
Passenger Seat Height Adjustment โœ“ โ€”
Passenger Seat Lumbar Support Power โ€”
Seat Material: Cloth โ€” โœ“
Driver Seat Manual Adjustments โ€” 6-way
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments โ€” 4-way
Rearseats
Feature Volvo Ford
Rear Head Room 37.2 in. 34.8 in.
Rear Leg Room 35.2 in. 29.0 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 54.5 in. 52.2 in.
Rear Hip Room 53.4 in. 47.4 in.
Folding Rear Seat Feature โœ“ โ€”
Pass-Thru Center Armrest โœ“ โ€”
Split-Folding Rear Seatback โ€” โœ“
Tires and Wheels
Feature Volvo Ford
Wheel Finish Painted Alloy Painted Alloy
Wheel Size 18 x 8.0 in 18 x 8.0 in
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size 235/45R18 235/50R18
Spare Tire Type Temporary โ€”
Spare Tire Location Inside Mounted โ€”
Suspension
Feature Volvo Ford
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension โœ“ โœ“
Front Stabilizer Bar โœ“ โœ“
Rear Stabilizer Bar โœ“ โœ“
Warranty
Feature Volvo Ford
Basic Warranty 4 yr./ 50000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 4 yr./ 50000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 12 yr./ unlimited mi. 5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 4 yr./ unlimited mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance 3 yr./ 30000 mi. โ€”

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Volvo S60 and 2026 Ford Mustang.

How significant is the performance gap between these two models?

The performance disparity is substantial; the 2026 Mustang generates 315 horsepower and 350 lb-ft of torque, whereas the 2025 S60 produces 247 hp and 258 lb-ft of torque. This 68 hp difference means the Mustang will offer considerably quicker acceleration metrics.

Which vehicle is the better choice for minimizing annual fuel costs?

The Volvo S60 is the more economical choice for fuel consumption, returning 30 combined MPG. The Ford Mustang, due to its performance focus, is rated for only 26 combined MPG, resulting in an approximate 13% difference in fuel efficiency.

Can the S60's sedan format accommodate more cargo than the Mustang coupe?

No, surprisingly the Mustang coupe offers better utility in this comparison. The Mustang provides 13.5 cu ft of cargo capacity, slightly exceeding the S60's 11.6 cu ft, despite the S60 being a four-door sedan.

Are the required fuel types different for these vehicles?

Both the 2025 Volvo S60 and the 2026 Ford Mustang specify that premium unleaded fuel is recommended. This is an operational cost similarity despite their performance and efficiency differences.

What is the MSRP difference that influences the value proposition?

The base MSRP places the Volvo S60 at $42,600, while the Ford Mustang starts at $32,320. This results in a significant $10,280 initial cost savings when choosing the Mustang.

How do the drivetrain setups differ between the two vehicles?

The S60 utilizes a traditional front-wheel drive (FWD) system paired with an 8-speed automatic transmission. In contrast, the Mustang employs a rear-wheel drive (RWD) setup managed by a 10-speed shiftable automatic transmission.

More Mid-Range Sedans ($30k-$50k)

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool