2025 Ford Ranger vs 2025 Toyota Tundra
Comparison Overview
Choosing between a midsize pickup like the 2025 Ford Ranger and a full-size option like the 2025 Toyota Tundra often comes down to parking tolerance versus brute capability. The Ranger starts appealingly at $33,350, significantly undercutting the Tundra's $40,090 starting MSRP, a substantial $6,740 upfront saving. While the Tundra offers a heftier powertrain boasting 348 horsepower, the Ranger counters with better fuel economy, achieving a combined 23 MPG compared to the Tundra's 20 MPG combined. Practicality also differs in size: the Ranger is easier to manage at 210.6 inches long, whereas the Tundra spans a massive 233.6 inches. Both trucks utilize a 10-speed automatic transmission and run on regular unleaded, but the Ranger presents a more economical entry point for light-duty truck needs.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Ford Ranger
The 2025 Ford Ranger wins for commuting due to its superior combined MPG of 23 versus the Tundra's 20 MPG.
2025 Ford Ranger
The Ranger's smaller footprint (210.6 inches long versus 233.6 inches) makes it far easier to maneuver and park when running family errands.
2025 Toyota Tundra
The 2025 Toyota Tundra is the clear choice for performance enthusiasts, packing 348 horsepower compared to the Ranger's unknown, but implied lower output.
2025 Ford Ranger
With a $6,740 lower starting MSRP, the Ford Ranger offers substantially better immediate financial value.
Choose the Ford Ranger if...
- You prioritize fuel efficiency, as the Ranger delivers 23 MPG combined versus the Tundra's 20 MPG.
- Your budget is firm, evidenced by the Ranger’s $33,350 MSRP compared to the Tundra's $40,090.
- You frequently navigate tight city streets or small garages, given the Ranger's 75.5-inch width versus the Tundra's 80.2 inches.
Choose the Toyota Tundra if...
- You require higher maximum towing or payload capacity, indicated by the Tundra’s significantly larger dimensions and power.
- Maximum horsepower is critical for your driving style, as the Tundra offers 348 hp.
- You need the added stability and presence provided by the Tundra’s larger overall size (e.g., 78.0 inches high).
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Ranger | Toyota Tundra |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 210.6" | 233.6" |
| Width | 75.5" | 80.2" |
| Height | 74.4" | 78.0" |
| Wheelbase | 128.7" | 145.7" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Fog Lights | ✓ | — |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | — |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | — | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | — | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.3 L | 3.4 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | V6 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 24 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
| Horsepower | — | 348 hp @ 5200 rpm |
| Torque | — | 405 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 10-speed shiftable automatic | 10-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | rear wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 21/26 MPG | 18/23 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 23 MPG | 20 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 378.0/468.0 mi. | 405.0/517.5 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 18.0 gal. | 22.5 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Push Button Start | — | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | — | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 10.0 in | 8.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 6 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | ✓ | — |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | ✓ | — |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | — | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | — | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | — | With Real Time Traffic |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | — | 3 months |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 2 | 4 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | — |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Keyless Entry | — | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 41.0 in. | 41.0 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 43.2 in. | 41.2 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.1 in. | 65.0 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 55.9 in. | 62.6 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 4-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | — |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Manual | — |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 4-way |
| Driver Seat Heating | Multi-level | — |
| Passenger Seat Heating | Multi-level | — |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.3 in. | 38.5 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 34.6 in. | 33.3 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 56.7 in. | 63.4 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 54.1 in. | 60.5 in. |
| Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | — |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | — |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | — |
| Wheel Diameter | 17 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Terrain | All Season |
| Tire Size | 255/70R17 | P245/75R18 |
| Spare Tire Type | Full Size Non-Matching | Full Size Non-Matching |
| Spare Tire Location | Underbody Mounted | Underbody Mounted |
| Wheel Material | — | Steel |
| Wheel Size | — | 18 x 8.0 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | Independent |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 2 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | — | 2 yr./ 25000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Ranger and 2025 Toyota Tundra.
What is the main difference in starting price between the 2025 Ranger and Tundra?
The 2025 Ford Ranger has a notable price advantage, starting at $33,350. This is $6,740 less expensive than the starting MSRP for the 2025 Toyota Tundra, which begins at $40,090.
How much more powerful is the 2025 Toyota Tundra compared to the base Ranger?
Based on the provided data, the 2025 Tundra delivers 348 horsepower, making it the clear performance leader in this comparison, while the Ranger's horsepower rating is not specified but is generally lower for a midsize truck.
Is the Tundra significantly larger than the Ranger for parking purposes?
Yes, the Tundra is considerably larger; it measures 233.6 inches long, making it over 23 inches longer than the 210.6-inch Ranger, and it is also significantly wider and taller.
Which truck offers better fuel economy for daily driving?
The 2025 Ford Ranger is the more fuel-efficient option, boasting a combined rating of 23 MPG. The larger 2025 Tundra is rated lower at 20 MPG combined.
Do both trucks require the same type of fuel?
Both the 2025 Ford Ranger and the 2025 Toyota Tundra are specified to run on regular unleaded gasoline, which is a convenience shared between these two models.
Are the transmissions significantly different between the two base models?
No, both the Ranger and the Tundra come equipped with a 10-speed shiftable automatic transmission, offering similar control and gearing structure for either vehicle.
More Mid-Range Trucks ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool