2025 Ford Ranger vs 2025 GMC Canyon
Comparison Overview
Trying to decide between the freshly updated 2025 Ford Ranger and the sophisticated 2025 GMC Canyon can be tricky since both are excellent mid-size trucks. The primary hurdle for many shoppers is the upfront cost versus capability. The Ranger undercuts the Canyon significantly, starting at just $33,350 compared to the Canyon's $38,400, a $5,050 difference. However, the Canyon brings more muscle to the fight, boasting 310 hp and 430 lb-ft of torque, though this power comes at the expense of efficiency, as the Ranger achieves a slightly better combined MPG of 23 versus the Canyon's 20 MPG. If maximizing fuel economy for daily driving is key, the Ranger's 26 MPG highway rating is appealing. While the Canyon is slightly longer at 213.2 inches, the Ranger offers a slightly smaller footprint overall, which might matter in tight parking lots.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Ford Ranger
The 2025 Ford Ranger wins for commuters due to its better combined fuel economy of 23 MPG versus the Canyon's 20 MPG.
2025 Ford Ranger
The lower initial MSRP of $33,350 for the Ranger makes it the more budget-friendly choice for family hauling needs.
2025 GMC Canyon
The 2025 GMC Canyon is the clear pick for enthusiasts, offering substantially more power with 310 hp and 430 lb-ft of torque.
2025 Ford Ranger
The Ranger provides a lower barrier to entry with a $5,050 lower starting price while still maintaining respectable utility.
Choose the Ford Ranger if...
- You prioritize saving money upfront, as the 2025 Ford Ranger starts at $33,350.
- You commute frequently and want better fuel efficiency, thanks to its 23 combined MPG rating.
- You prefer a vehicle that is slightly more compact, measuring 210.6 inches long.
Choose the GMC Canyon if...
- Maximum on-paper performance matters most, given its 310 hp and 430 lb-ft of torque.
- You require a slightly larger stature, as the Canyon is the taller vehicle at 79.8 inches.
- You prefer a different shift logic with the 8-speed automatic transmission compared to the Ranger's 10-speed.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Ranger | GMC Canyon |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 210.6" | 213.2" |
| Width | 75.5" | 72.4" |
| Height | 74.4" | 79.8" |
| Wheelbase | 128.7" | 131.0" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Fog Lights | ✓ | — |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 2 |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Blind Spot Monitor | — | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | — | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | — | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | — | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | — | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | — | ✓ |
| Front Integrated Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.3 L | 2.7 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
| Horsepower | — | 310 hp @ 5600 rpm |
| Torque | — | 430 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm |
| Cylinder Deactivation | — | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 10-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | rear wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
| Rear Differential Type | — | Locking |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 21/26 MPG | 19/23 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 23 MPG | 20 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 378.0/468.0 mi. | 406.6/492.2 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 18.0 gal. | 21.4 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | — |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | — |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Push Button Start | — | ✓ |
| Tilt Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | — | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 10.0 in | 11.3 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 6 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | ✓ | — |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | ✓ | — |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | — | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | — | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | — | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | — | 3 months |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 2 | 4 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | — |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Keyless Entry | — | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 41.0 in. | 40.3 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 43.2 in. | 45.2 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.1 in. | 57.4 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 55.9 in. | 54.7 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Manual | — |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 4-way |
| Driver Seat Heating | Multi-level | — |
| Passenger Seat Heating | Multi-level | — |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.3 in. | 39.2 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 34.6 in. | 34.7 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 56.7 in. | 56.1 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 54.1 in. | 53.1 in. |
| Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | — |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | — |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Diameter | 17 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Terrain | All Terrain |
| Tire Size | 255/70R17 | 265/65R18 |
| Spare Tire Type | Full Size Non-Matching | Full Size Non-Matching |
| Spare Tire Location | Underbody Mounted | Underbody Mounted |
| Wheel Size | — | 18 x 8.5 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | Independent |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 6 yr./ 100000 mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | — | 1 yr./ unlimited mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Ranger and 2025 GMC Canyon.
What is the major performance difference between the 2025 Ranger and Canyon?
The 2025 GMC Canyon has a distinct performance advantage, packing 310 horsepower and 430 lb-ft of torque, while the Ford Ranger specs provided do not list horsepower, suggesting the Canyon is geared more toward power users.
Is the price difference between these two trucks significant for buyers?
Yes, the difference is substantial; the 2025 GMC Canyon commands an MSRP of $38,400, which is $5,050 more expensive than the 2025 Ford Ranger starting at $33,350.
Which truck is better for long-distance highway driving in terms of fuel economy?
The 2025 Ford Ranger offers better highway efficiency, achieving 26 MPG on the highway compared to the Canyon's 23 MPG highway rating.
How do the dimensions compare for parking and maneuvering?
The Ranger is slightly shorter in length at 210.6 inches and narrower at 75.5 inches, although the Canyon is significantly taller at 79.8 inches versus the Ranger's 74.4 inches.
Do these trucks use the same type of fuel and transmission?
Both vehicles use regular unleaded fuel and feature shiftable automatic transmissions; however, the Ranger utilizes a 10-speed automatic while the Canyon is equipped with an 8-speed automatic.
If I need power, is the Canyon worth the extra cost over the Ranger?
For performance seekers, yes; the Canyon's advantage of 310 hp and 430 lb-ft of torque directly contributes to its higher price tag compared to the base Ranger.
More Mid-Range Trucks ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool