2025 Ford F-250 Super Duty vs 2026 Nissan Frontier
Comparison Overview
The $13,150 MSRP gap between the 2025 Ford F-250 Super Duty ($45,300) and the 2026 Nissan Frontier ($32,150) highlights their vastly different market positions. The F-250 generates 405 horsepower and 445 lb-ft of torque, significantly outperforming the Frontier’s 310 hp and 281 lb-ft, suggesting substantial capability advantages for the heavy-duty truck. Conversely, the smaller Frontier offers superior fuel economy, achieving a combined 21 MPG, whereas the F-250 is inherently less efficient given its class. Dimensional differences are also pronounced: the F-250 stands 7.4 inches taller and is 7.8 inches wider than the Frontier. While both utilize RWD and automatic transmissions (10-speed for the F-250, 9-speed for the Frontier), the Super Duty prioritizes sheer power and size, while the Frontier focuses on affordability and maneuverability for lighter duty tasks.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2026 Nissan Frontier
The 2026 Nissan Frontier wins for commuters due to its superior 21 combined MPG rating and smaller 210.2-inch length, aiding city driving and fuel costs.
2025 Ford F-250 Super Duty
The 2025 Ford F-250 offers substantially greater width (80.0 inches vs. 73.0 inches), likely translating to more cabin space for families, despite its higher price.
2025 Ford F-250 Super Duty
The F-250's torque advantage of 445 lb-ft compared to the Frontier's 281 lb-ft makes it the clear choice for performance-oriented truck buyers.
2026 Nissan Frontier
The Nissan Frontier presents superior entry value with an MSRP that is $13,150 lower than the Ford F-250.
Choose the Ford F-250 Super Duty if...
- Maximum power is required, evidenced by its 405 hp output versus the Frontier's 310 hp.
- Superior utility demands a larger footprint, as shown by its 231.8-inch length and 78.9-inch height.
- Towing or heavy payload capacity is the primary objective, inferred from the Super Duty classification and high torque rating of 445 lb-ft.
Choose the Nissan Frontier if...
- Lower operational costs are prioritized, highlighted by its 21 combined MPG rating.
- Budget constraints are strict, given the significantly lower entry MSRP of $32,150.
- Maneuverability is key, utilizing its 73.0-inch width and shorter overall dimensions compared to the massive F-250.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford F-250 Super Duty | Nissan Frontier |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 231.8" | 210.2" |
| Width | 80.0" | 73.0" |
| Height | 78.9" | 71.5" |
| Wheelbase | 141.4" | 126.0" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Deactivation Switch | ✓ | — |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | — |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Front Headrests | 3 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | — |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Blind Spot Monitor | — | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | — | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | — | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | — | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | — | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | — | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | — | ✓ |
| Brake Assist | — | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | — | 2 |
| Rear Fixed Headrests | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 6.8 L | 3.8 L |
| Number of Cylinders | V8 | V6 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 405 hp @ 5000 rpm | 310 hp @ 6400 rpm |
| Torque | 445 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 281 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 24 |
| Camshaft Type | Overhead valves (OHV) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | — | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 10-speed shiftable automatic | 9-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | rear wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
| Rear Differential Type | — | Limited Slip |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 0/0 mi. | 399.0/504.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34.0 gal. | 21.0 gal. |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | — | 19/24 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | — | 21 MPG |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Power Steering | ✓ | — |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | — |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Vanity Mirror | ✓ | — |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Push Button Start | — | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | — | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | — | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | — | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | — | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 8.0 in | 8.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 4 | 4 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | — |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | — |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Android Auto (Wired) | — | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | — | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 2 | 1 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 40.8 in. | 39.7 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 43.9 in. | 42.3 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 66.7 in. | 58.2 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 62.5 in. | 54.3 in. |
| Seat Material: Vinyl | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: 40-20-40 Split Bench | ✓ | — |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Manual | — |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
| Seat Material: Cloth | — | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | — | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | — | ✓ |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | — | 36.6 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | — | 26.2 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | — | 52.4 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | — | 52.2 in. |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Steel | Painted Steel |
| Wheel Cover Type | ✓ | — |
| Wheel Diameter | 17 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | LT245/75R | P265/70R16 |
| Spare Tire Type | Full Size Matching | Full Size Non-Matching |
| Spare Tire Location | Underbody Mounted | Underbody Mounted |
| Wheel Size | — | 16 x 7.0 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | Independent |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 100000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford F-250 Super Duty and 2026 Nissan Frontier.
How does the horsepower difference affect daily driving between the 2025 F-250 and 2026 Frontier?
The F-250 produces 405 hp, a substantial 95 hp more than the Frontier's 310 hp. This indicates the F-250 is engineered for much heavier work or towing capabilities, whereas the Frontier's power is sufficient for lighter-duty tasks and daily commuting.
What is the real-world implication of the F-250's MSRP being $13,150 higher than the Frontier?
The $45,300 MSRP for the F-250 places it firmly in the heavy-duty segment, justifying its cost through superior capability metrics like higher torque (445 lb-ft). The Frontier's $32,150 price reflects its mid-size positioning and focus on economy.
Which truck offers better fuel efficiency, and what are the exact figures?
The 2026 Nissan Frontier is significantly more fuel-efficient, achieving a combined 21 MPG (19 city/24 highway). The 2025 Ford F-250, being a heavy-duty vehicle, does not list a specific MPG rating here but will inherently consume more fuel.
Are the transmission systems comparable in these two very different trucks?
Both trucks feature shiftable automatic transmissions, but the F-250 utilizes a 10-speed unit to manage its higher power output, while the Frontier is equipped with a 9-speed automatic.
Comparing dimensions, which truck is more practical for standard parking garages?
The 2026 Nissan Frontier is vastly more practical, measuring 210.2 inches long and 71.5 inches high. The Ford F-250 is over two feet longer (231.8 inches) and significantly taller at 78.9 inches, posing clearance issues.
Both vehicles are listed as Rear Wheel Drive; how does the torque delivery differ?
The F-250's torque rating of 445 lb-ft is 164 lb-ft greater than the Frontier's 281 lb-ft. This metric is crucial for maximizing traction and pulling power when the RWD system is engaged under load.
More Mid-Range Trucks ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool