2026 Mazda CX-90 vs 2026 Volvo XC60
Comparison Overview
The 2026 Mazda CX-90 rockets onto the scene with an exhilarating 280 horsepower, appealing directly to the driver who craves immediate throttle response and genuine engagement from their three-row crossover. Conversely, the 2026 Volvo XC60 offers a sanctuary of Scandinavian restraint, prioritizing quiet efficiency with a commendable 26 combined MPG. The CX-90 boasts substantially more muscle (332 lb-ft of torque versus the XC60's 266 lb-ft) and commands a significant $10,900 lower MSRP, starting at just $38,800 compared to the Volvo's $49,700. Furthermore, the Mazda, at 200.8 inches long, offers greater exterior presence than the shorter XC60 (185.4 inches). While the Volvo nudges ahead in fuel economy with 30 highway MPG, the CX-90โs accessible power and lower entry price create a compelling dynamic for performance-minded buyers seeking utility.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2026 Volvo XC60
The Volvo XC60 wins for daily commuting due to its slightly better 26 combined MPG and generally more refined, serene cabin expected in this segment.
2026 Mazda CX-90
The Mazda CX-90 is the better family hauler due to its significantly larger 200.8-inch frame, suggesting more usable three-row or cargo space, despite the provided cargo capacity number seeming low.
2026 Mazda CX-90
The CX-90 delivers superior raw performance metrics, offering 280 horsepower and 332 lb-ft of torque, creating a more engaging drive.
2026 Mazda CX-90
The CX-90 provides substantially more power and size for an entry price that is $10,900 less than the XC60.
Choose the Mazda CX-90 if...
- You prioritize raw performance, benefiting from 280 horsepower and 332 lb-ft of torque.
- Budget is a major constraint, as the $38,800 MSRP undercuts the Volvo by $10,900.
- You need a longer vehicle, as the CX-90 measures 200.8 inches in length compared to the XC60โs 185.4 inches.
Choose the Volvo XC60 if...
- You prefer a slightly more fuel-efficient crossover, netting 30 highway MPG versus the CX-90's 28.
- You desire a more compact footprint, as the XC60 is substantially shorter and perhaps easier to maneuver in tight city centers.
- Your preference leans toward premium fuel efficiency and an assumed quieter ride quality associated with the Volvo brand.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Mazda CX-90 | Volvo XC60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 200.8" | 185.4" |
| Width | 78.5" | - |
| Height | 68.3" | 65.2" |
| Wheelbase | 122.8" | 112.8" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | โ | โ |
| Lane Departure Warning | โ | โ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | โ | โ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | โ | โ |
| Driver Attention Alert | โ | โ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | โ | โ |
| Front Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Rear Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Third Row Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | โ | โ |
| Electronic Stability Control | โ | โ |
| Traction Control System | โ | โ |
| LATCH System | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | โ | โ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Brake Preparation System | โ | โ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | โ | โ |
| Automatic Headlights | โ | โ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | โ | โ |
| LED Headlights | โ | โ |
| Self-Leveling Headlights | โ | โ |
| Daytime Running Lights | โ | โ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | โ | โ |
| Engine Immobilizer | โ | โ |
| Brake Assist | โ | โ |
| Adaptive Headlights | โ | โ |
| Cornering Lights | โ | โ |
| Front Fog Lights | โ | โ |
| Front Fixed Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Folding Headrests | โ | โ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | โ | โ |
Engine
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 3.3 L | 2.0 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 6 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | mild hybrid | mild hybrid |
| Horsepower | 280 hp @ 5000 rpm | 247 hp |
| Torque | 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm | 266 lb-ft |
| Number of Valves | 24 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | โ | โ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 8-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| Center Differential Type | Limited Slip | โ |
| Hill Descent Control | โ | โ |
Fuel
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | premium unleaded (recommended) |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 23/28 MPG | 23/30 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 25 MPG | 26 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 425.5/518.0 mi. | 432.4/564.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 18.8 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | โ | โ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Electric Power Steering | โ | โ |
| Rear View Camera | โ | โ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | โ | โ |
| Front Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Rear Cupholders | โ | โ |
| 3rd Row Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Front Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | โ | โ |
| Front Seatback Storage | โ | โ |
| Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry | โ | โ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Three Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | โ | โ |
| Interior Air Filtration | โ | โ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Front Parking Sensors | โ | โ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | โ | โ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | โ | โ |
| Simulated Alloy Trim on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror | โ | โ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 10.3 in | 11.2 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | โ | โ |
| Speaker System | 8 | 10 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | โ | โ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | โ | โ |
| USB Port | โ | โ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | โ | โ |
| Memory Card Slot | โ | โ |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | โ | โ |
| Stereo Power | โ | 220W |
| Satellite Radio | โ | โ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | โ | 3 months |
Power Feature
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 4 |
| Keyless Entry | โ | โ |
| Heated Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Moonroof Type | โ | 1st Row Power Glass |
Frontseats
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 39.7 in. | 38.0 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.7 in. | 41.5 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 59.2 in. | 58.2 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 56.2 in. | 56.4 in. |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | โ | โ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | โ | โ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | โ | โ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | Power |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | โ |
| Driver Seat Memory Settings | โ | 2 |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | โ | 8-way |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | โ | โ |
| Passenger Seat Lumbar Support | โ | Power |
| Driver Seat Heating | โ | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | โ | Multi-level |
Rearseats
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.3 in. | 38.0 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 39.4 in. | 38.0 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 58.1 in. | 56.3 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 55.5 in. | 55.4 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | โ | โ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | โ | โ |
| Folding Center Armrest | โ | โ |
| Manual Folding Third Row Seat | โ | โ |
| Folding Rear Seat Feature | โ | โ |
| Pass-Thru Center Armrest | โ | โ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Material | Alloy | โ |
| Wheel Size | 19 x 8.5 in | 18 x 7.5 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 265/55R19 | 235/60R18 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Finish | โ | Painted Alloy |
Suspension
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | โ | โ |
| Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
Warranty
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 12 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 4 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | โ | 2 yr./ 20000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2026 Mazda CX-90 and 2026 Volvo XC60.
How much more power does the Mazda CX-90 have over the Volvo XC60?
The 2026 Mazda CX-90 produces 280 horsepower, giving it a noticeable 33 hp advantage over the 2026 Volvo XC60โs 247 horsepower rating. This extra power translates directly into higher torque figures, with the Mazda putting down 332 lb-ft versus the Volvoโs 266 lb-ft.
Is the price difference between the two crossovers significant?
Yes, the difference is substantial; the Volvo XC60 commands an MSRP of $49,700, making it $10,900 more expensive than the Mazda CX-90 starting at $38,800. This large gap makes the Mazda the clear value contender.
Which car is physically larger for carrying passengers or cargo?
The Mazda CX-90 is the physically larger vehicle, measuring 200.8 inches long compared to the XC60โs 185.4 inches in length. While the provided cargo figures are surprisingly close (14.9 cu ft for the CX-90), the longer wheelbase usually benefits third-row comfort.
Do these vehicles require different fuel types?
The Mazda CX-90 is designed to run efficiently on regular unleaded gasoline, optimizing its overall running costs. The Volvo XC60 recommends premium unleaded, which typically results in higher costs at the pump.
How close are the fuel economy ratings for these AWD crossovers?
The fuel economy ratings are competitive, with the Volvo XC60 achieving a slight edge at 26 combined MPG (23 city/30 highway). The CX-90 trails just slightly at 25 combined MPG (23 city/28 highway).
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool