2026 Mazda CX-90 vs 2026 Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid

Mazda CX-90

$38,800 · Crossover

vs
Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid

$44,710 · Crossover

Comparison Overview

The most significant numerical divergence between the 2026 Mazda CX-90 and the 2026 Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid is fuel economy, with the Toyota achieving a 34 MPG combined versus the Mazda’s 25 MPG combined, a substantial 9 MPG advantage. This efficiency comes at a cost, as the Toyota’s MSRP starts at $44,710, considerably higher than the CX-90’s $38,800 entry point. Performance specs also separate the two: the CX-90 produces 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque, outpacing the Toyota’s 245 hp output. However, cargo capacity strongly favors the Highlander, offering 20.6 cu ft compared to the CX-90's 14.9 cu ft. While both vehicles offer standard All-Wheel Drive, the powertrain philosophy differs, with Mazda utilizing an 8-speed automatic and Toyota opting for a CVT.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

🚗 Best for Commuters

2026 Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid

The Grand Highlander Hybrid offers significantly superior fuel economy at 34 MPG combined, reducing routine operational costs for daily travel.

👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Best for Families

2026 Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid

The Toyota offers substantially more utility with 20.6 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the Mazda's 14.9 cu ft.

🏎️ Best for Enthusiasts

2026 Mazda CX-90

The Mazda CX-90 generates greater output with 280 horsepower and 332 lb-ft of torque, paired with a traditional 8-speed automatic transmission.

💰 Best Value

2026 Mazda CX-90

The Mazda CX-90 commands a lower initial investment, priced $5,910 less than the Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid.

Choose the Mazda CX-90 if...

  • Budget constraints are a primary concern, as the MSRP is $38,800 versus the competitor's higher price.
  • Maximum engine output is prioritized, given its 280 hp rating and 332 lb-ft of torque.
  • A traditional gear shifting experience is preferred over a continuously variable transmission (CVT).

Choose the Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid if...

  • Maximizing hauling capability is necessary, evidenced by its 20.6 cu ft of cargo space.
  • Achieving class-leading fuel efficiency is essential, demonstrated by its 34 MPG combined rating.
  • A taller ride height (72.1 inches) and superior rear passenger volume are required.

Key Dimensions

Dimension Mazda CX-90 Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid
Length 200.8" 201.4"
Width 78.5" 78.3"
Height 68.3" 72.1"
Wheelbase 122.8" 116.1"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Mazda Toyota
Blind Spot Monitor
Lane Departure Warning
Lane Keeping Assist System
Rear Cross Traffic Alert
Driver Attention Alert
Pre-Collision Safety System
Post-Collision Safety System
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags
Front Head Airbags
Rear Head Airbags
Third Row Head Airbags
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation
Electronic Stability Control
Traction Control System
LATCH System
Rear Door Child Safety Locks
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes
Brake Preparation System
Tire Pressure Monitoring System
Automatic Headlights
Headlight Delay-Off
LED Headlights
Self-Leveling Headlights
Daytime Running Lights
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors
Front Headrests 2 2
Front Height Adjustable Headrests
Rear Headrests 3 3
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt
Engine Immobilizer
Brake Assist
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote)
Engine
Feature Mazda Toyota
Base Engine Displacement 3.3 L 2.5 L
Number of Cylinders inline 6 inline 4
Base Engine Type mild hybrid hybrid
Horsepower 280 hp @ 5000 rpm 245 hp @ 6000 rpm
Torque 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm
Number of Valves 24 16
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type
Drive Train
Feature Mazda Toyota
Transmission Type 8-speed shiftable automatic continuously variable-speed automatic
Drivetrain Type all wheel drive all wheel drive
Center Differential Type Limited Slip
Hill Descent Control
Fuel
Feature Mazda Toyota
Fuel Type regular unleaded regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 23/28 MPG 36/32 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 25 MPG 34 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 425.5/518.0 mi. 619.2/550.4 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 18.5 gal. 17.2 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Mazda Toyota
Push Button Start
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel
Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
Electric Power Steering
Rear View Camera
Adaptive Cruise Control
Front Cupholders
Rear Cupholders
3rd Row Cupholders
Front Door Pockets
Rear Door Pockets
Overhead Console with Storage
Front Seatback Storage
Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry
Leather Steering Wheel
Three Zone Climate Control
Rear Ventilation Ducts
Interior Air Filtration
Dual Vanity Mirrors
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors
Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control
In Car Entertainment
Feature Mazda Toyota
Infotainment Display 10.3 in 12.3 in
AM/FM Stereo
Speaker System 8 6
Android Auto (Wired)
Apple CarPlay (Wired)
USB Port
USB Port with External Media Control
Memory Card Slot
Speed Sensitive Volume Control
Android Auto (Wireless)
Apple CarPlay (Wireless)
Satellite Radio
Satellite Radio Trial Period 3 months
Power Feature
Feature Mazda Toyota
One-Touch Power Windows 4 4
Keyless Entry
Heated Mirrors
Frontseats
Feature Mazda Toyota
Front Head Room 39.7 in. 41.5 in.
Front Leg Room 41.7 in. 41.7 in.
Front Shoulder Room 59.2 in. 60.2 in.
Front Hip Room 56.2 in. 56.5 in.
Seat Material: Leatherette
Front Seat Type: Bucket
Driver Seat Power Adjustments 8-way 8-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment
Driver Seat Lumbar Support Power
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments 4-way 4-way
Seat Material: Cloth
Rearseats
Feature Mazda Toyota
Rear Head Room 39.3 in. 40.2 in.
Rear Leg Room 39.4 in. 39.5 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 58.1 in. 58.8 in.
Rear Hip Room 55.5 in. 57.0 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback
Reclining Rear Seats
Folding Center Armrest
Manual Folding Third Row Seat
Tires and Wheels
Feature Mazda Toyota
Wheel Material Alloy Alloy
Wheel Size 19 x 8.5 in 18 x 7.5 in
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size 265/55R19 255/65R18
Spare Tire Type Temporary Temporary
Spare Tire Location Inside Mounted Inside Mounted
Suspension
Feature Mazda Toyota
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension
Stabilizer Bar
Front Stabilizer Bar
Rear Stabilizer Bar
Warranty
Feature Mazda Toyota
Basic Warranty 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 5 yr./ unlimited mi. 5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 2 yr./ unlimited mi.
Hybrid Component Warranty 8 yr./ 100000 mi.
Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance 2 yr./ 25000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2026 Mazda CX-90 and 2026 Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid.

What is the primary mechanical difference affecting daily driving between these two crossovers?

The Mazda CX-90 utilizes a standard 8-speed shiftable automatic transmission while delivering 280 horsepower. Conversely, the Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid employs a continuously variable-speed automatic transmission, but it produces less power at 245 horsepower.

How significantly does the Grand Highlander Hybrid’s superior MPG translate to fuel savings over the CX-90?

The Toyota provides a 9 MPG advantage in combined fuel economy (34 MPG vs. 25 MPG), which will result in notably lower annual fuel expenditures compared to the CX-90, despite both using regular unleaded fuel.

Is the Mazda CX-90 significantly smaller than the Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid?

While both are long crossovers, the Toyota is slightly longer by 0.6 inches (201.4 vs. 200.8 inches), but it is substantially taller at 72.1 inches compared to the Mazda’s 68.3 inches.

Why is the price difference between the two vehicles over $5,900?

The $5,910 MSRP gap ($44,710 vs. $38,800) reflects the hybrid powertrain technology in the Toyota, which boosts fuel efficiency, as well as its greater standard cargo volume (20.6 cu ft).

If towing capability were the deciding factor, which vehicle should I choose based on specs?

Since exact towing capacities are not listed, torque figures suggest better potential for towing heavy loads; the CX-90 offers a higher 332 lb-ft compared to the hybrid's implied lower output, making it the tentative performance choice.

Does the CX-90 offer a superior highway driving experience regarding efficiency?

No, the Grand Highlander Hybrid shows better highway efficiency, achieving 32 MPG on the highway compared to the CX-90's 28 MPG highway rating.

More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool