2026 Mazda CX-50 vs 2026 Subaru Forester
Comparison Overview
The 2026 Mazda CX-50 ignites the senses with its sporty stance, boasting 187 hp and 185 lb-ft of torque, suggesting a more engaging drive than its rival. In contrast, the 2026 Subaru Forester emphasizes rugged utility, towering at 68.1 inches in height and offering superior fuel economy at 29 MPG combined. The CX-50 holds a slight performance edge with its 187 hp output versus the Forester's 180 hp, but the Forester claws back efficiency points, netting 3 MPG better overall. Size-wise, the CX-50 is wider at 75.6 inches, while the Forester provides marginally more vertical space. Priced almost identically at $29,900 (CX-50) and $29,995 (Forester), the choice boils down to whether one prioritizes Mazda's slick 6-speed automatic transmission and sharper design or Subaru's exceptional city mileage of 26 MPG and imposing height.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2026 Subaru Forester
The 2026 Subaru Forester wins for commuters due to its superior combined fuel economy rating of 29 MPG.
2026 Mazda CX-50
The Mazda CX-50 offers more available cargo space at 31.4 cubic feet compared to the Forester's 29.6 cubic feet.
2026 Mazda CX-50
The Mazda CX-50 delivers superior output with 187 horsepower and 185 lb-ft of torque, promising a more spirited performance feel.
2026 Mazda CX-50
The Mazda CX-50 is $95 cheaper while offering higher peak horsepower figures.
Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...
- You prefer the tactile connection of a traditional 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission over a CVT.
- You desire the slight performance advantage provided by 187 hp and 185 lb-ft of torque.
- You need the slightly larger cargo area, maximizing utility with 31.4 cubic feet of space.
Choose the Subaru Forester if...
- Maximizing fuel efficiency is paramount, as the Forester achieves 33 MPG on the highway.
- You value a taller stance for better visibility and easier entry/exit (68.1 inches high).
- You prefer the inherent efficiency tuning of a continuously variable transmission (CVT) in stop-and-go driving.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Mazda CX-50 | Subaru Forester |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 185.8" | 183.3" |
| Width | 75.6" | 72.0" |
| Height | 63.5" | 68.1" |
| Wheelbase | 110.8" | 105.1" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Mazda | Subaru |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | โ | โ |
| Lane Departure Warning | โ | โ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | โ | โ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | โ | โ |
| Driver Attention Alert | โ | โ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | โ | โ |
| Front Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Rear Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | โ | โ |
| Electronic Stability Control | โ | โ |
| Traction Control System | โ | โ |
| LATCH System | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | โ | โ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Brake Assist | โ | โ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | โ | โ |
| Automatic Headlights | โ | โ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | โ | โ |
| LED Headlights | โ | โ |
| Daytime Running Lights | โ | โ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | โ | โ |
| Engine Immobilizer | โ | โ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Adaptive Headlights | โ | โ |
| Front Multi-Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | โ | โ |
Engine
| Feature | Mazda | Subaru |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.5 L | 2.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | flat 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 187 hp @ 6000 rpm | 180 hp @ 5800 rpm |
| Torque | 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 178 lb-ft @ 3700 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | โ | โ |
| Cylinder Deactivation | โ | โ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Mazda | Subaru |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | continuously variable-speed automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| Center Differential Type | โ | Limited Slip |
Fuel
| Feature | Mazda | Subaru |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 24/30 MPG | 26/33 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 26 MPG | 29 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 381.6/477.0 mi. | 431.6/547.8 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 15.9 gal. | 16.6 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Mazda | Subaru |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | โ | โ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Electric Power Steering | โ | โ |
| Rear View Camera | โ | โ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | โ | โ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | โ | โ |
| Front Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Rear Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Front Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | โ | โ |
| Front Seatback Storage | โ | โ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | โ | โ |
| Interior Air Filtration | โ | โ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | โ | โ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Mazda | Subaru |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 10.3 in | 7.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | โ | โ |
| Speaker System | 8 | 4 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | โ | โ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | โ | โ |
| USB Port | โ | โ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | โ | โ |
| Auxiliary Audio Input | โ | โ |
| Satellite Radio | โ | โ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Length | โ | 4 months |
Power Feature
| Feature | Mazda | Subaru |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 1 |
| Keyless Entry | โ | โ |
| Heated Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Remote Keyless Entry | โ | โ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Mazda | Subaru |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 39.1 in. | 41.2 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.7 in. | 43.3 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 55.9 in. | 57.7 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 53.6 in. | 54.7 in. |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | โ | โ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | โ | โ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | โ | โ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
| Seat Material: Cloth | โ | โ |
Rearseats
| Feature | Mazda | Subaru |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.6 in. | 39.6 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 39.8 in. | 39.4 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 53.6 in. | 56.7 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 52.1 in. | 53.7 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | โ | โ |
| Folding Center Armrest | โ | โ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Mazda | Subaru |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Size | 17 x 7.0 in | 17 x 7.0 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | P225/65R17 | 225/60R H |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
Suspension
| Feature | Mazda | Subaru |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | โ |
| Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | โ | โ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
Warranty
| Feature | Mazda | Subaru |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2026 Mazda CX-50 and 2026 Subaru Forester.
Which crossover is better for pure highway efficiency?
The 2026 Subaru Forester takes the efficiency crown, achieving 33 MPG on the highway compared to the CX-50's 30 MPG highway rating. This difference of 3 MPG over the long haul will add up significantly for frequent road trippers.
How do the transmissions compare between these two AWD models?
The CX-50 uses a conventional 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission, which many drivers prefer for predictable shifting feel. Conversely, the Forester employs a continuously variable-speed automatic (CVT), which is optimized for smooth transitions and fuel economy maximization.
Does the CX-50 offer significantly more utility than the Forester?
The Mazda CX-50 offers marginally more utility with 31.4 cubic feet of cargo capacity compared to the Forester's 29.6 cubic feet. While both are practical, the CX-50 carries about 1.8 cubic feet more gear behind the second row.
Which vehicle has the more potent engine?
The 2026 Mazda CX-50 is the more powerful option, putting out 187 horsepower and 185 lb-ft of torque. The 2026 Subaru Forester trails slightly with 180 hp and 178 lb-ft of torque, suggesting the Mazda will feel quicker off the line.
Are these vehicles similarly sized for city parking?
The Subaru Forester is noticeably narrower (72.0 inches vs. 75.6 inches for the CX-50) and shorter in length (183.3 inches vs. 185.8 inches). However, the Forester is significantly taller at 68.1 inches, which might affect clearance in tight garages.
Is there a significant price difference between the two base trims?
No, the pricing is extremely close for these base models; the 2026 Mazda CX-50 starts at $29,900, while the 2026 Subaru Forester is listed at $29,995, resulting in a negligible $95 difference.
More Budget SUVs Under $30,000
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool