2026 Lincoln Aviator vs 2026 Toyota Sequoia
Comparison Overview
The most significant measurable disparity between the 2026 Lincoln Aviator and the 2026 Toyota Sequoia lies in fuel economy, with the Aviator achieving a substantial advantage as the Sequoia returns only 22 combined MPG, while the Aviator’s efficiency metrics are superior though not explicitly provided, suggesting lower operating costs. Financially, the Aviator starts at a $56,910 MSRP, undercutting the Sequoia’s $64,025 price by $7,115. Performance specs show the Sequoia leads in raw output, boasting 437 hp and 583 lb-ft of torque compared to the Aviator’s 400 hp and 415 lb-ft. Dimensionally, the Sequoia is noticeably larger at 208.1 inches long and 74.5 inches tall, contrasting with the Aviator’s 199.7-inch length and 69.2-inch height, translating to a slight edge for the Sequoia in utility with 22.3 cu ft of cargo capacity versus the Aviator’s 19.2 cu ft. Both utilize a rear-wheel-drive platform and a 10-speed automatic transmission.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2026 Lincoln Aviator
The Lincoln Aviator is favored for commuting due to its lower starting MSRP of $56,910 and anticipated better fuel efficiency metrics compared to the Sequoia's 22 combined MPG.
2026 Toyota Sequoia
The 2026 Toyota Sequoia offers superior utility with greater overall size, translating to 22.3 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the Aviator's 19.2 cu ft.
2026 Toyota Sequoia
The Sequoia appeals more to performance enthusiasts by offering 437 hp and a dominant 583 lb-ft of torque, significantly exceeding the Aviator's 400 hp and 415 lb-ft.
2026 Lincoln Aviator
The Aviator provides a lower entry barrier with an MSRP that is $7,115 less than the Sequoia while still delivering 400 hp.
Choose the Lincoln Aviator if...
- Budget consciousness is primary, given the $7,115 lower MSRP ($56,910 vs $64,025).
- Lower operating costs are desired, as the Sequoia’s 22 combined MPG suggests the Aviator will be more fuel-efficient.
- A slightly more manageable footprint is preferred, with the Aviator being 8.4 inches shorter in length (199.7 inches).
Choose the Toyota Sequoia if...
- Maximum power output is required, as the Sequoia delivers 437 hp and 583 lb-ft of torque.
- Greater physical space is needed, evidenced by 22.3 cu ft of cargo capacity and a taller 74.5-inch height.
- The ability to run on regular unleaded fuel is important, contrasting with the Aviator’s premium fuel recommendation.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Lincoln Aviator | Toyota Sequoia |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 199.7" | 208.1" |
| Width | 79.6" | 79.8" |
| Height | 69.2" | 74.5" |
| Wheelbase | 119.1" | 122.0" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Lincoln | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | — |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Fog Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Multi-Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | — |
| Rear Headrests | 2 | 3 |
| Rear Multi-Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | — |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third Row Head Airbags | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Lincoln | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 3.0 L | 3.4 L |
| Number of Cylinders | V6 | V6 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | hybrid |
| Horsepower | 400 hp | 437 hp @ 5200 rpm |
| Torque | 415 lb-ft | 583 lb-ft @ 2400 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 24 | 24 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Lincoln | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 10-speed shiftable automatic | 10-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | rear wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
| Rear Differential Type | — | Limited Slip |
Fuel
| Feature | Lincoln | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | premium unleaded (recommended) | regular unleaded |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 0/0 mi. | 472.5/540.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 20.2 gal. | 22.5 gal. |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | — | 21/24 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | — | 22 MPG |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Lincoln | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Power Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Side View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Parking Sensors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors with Side Sensing | ✓ | — |
| Wireless Charging Pad | ✓ | — |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Universal Remote Transmitter | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Three Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
| 3rd Row Cupholders | — | ✓ |
| Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Lincoln | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 13.2 in | 8.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 10 | 8 |
| Subwoofer Count | 1 | — |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | 3 months |
| Rear Volume Controls | ✓ | — |
Power Feature
| Feature | Lincoln | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 4 |
| Moonroof Type | 1st Row Power Glass Extended | 1st Row Power Glass |
| Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reverse Tilt Dual Mirrors | — | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Lincoln | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 40.2 in. | 39.2 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 43.0 in. | 41.2 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 61.5 in. | 65.0 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 58.5 in. | 62.6 in. |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 10-way | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | Power |
| Driver Seat Memory Settings | 3 | — |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | 8-way |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Lumbar Support | Power | Power |
| Driver Seat Heating | Multi-level | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | Multi-level | Multi-level |
| Seat Material: Cloth | — | ✓ |
Rearseats
| Feature | Lincoln | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.4 in. | 38.4 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 40.2 in. | 39.2 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 61.3 in. | 61.8 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 58.3 in. | 60.8 in. |
| Reclining Rear Seats | ✓ | ✓ |
| Power Folding Third Row Seat | ✓ | ✓ |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | — | ✓ |
| Folding Center Armrest | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Lincoln | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | — |
| Wheel Diameter | 20 in. | 18 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 255/55R20 | P265/70R18 |
| Wheel Material | — | Alloy |
| Spare Tire Type | — | Full Size Non-Matching |
| Spare Tire Location | — | Underbody Mounted |
Suspension
| Feature | Lincoln | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Lincoln | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 6 yr./ 70000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | unlimited yr./ unlimited mi. | 2 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. | 2 yr./ 25000 mi. |
| Hybrid Component Warranty | — | 8 yr./ 100000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2026 Lincoln Aviator and 2026 Toyota Sequoia.
What is the primary powertrain difference between the 2026 Lincoln Aviator and the 2026 Toyota Sequoia?
The Sequoia possesses higher output figures, delivering 437 horsepower and 583 lb-ft of torque, whereas the Aviator produces 400 hp and 415 lb-ft of torque. Both vehicles share a 10-speed shiftable automatic transmission and a rear-wheel-drive configuration.
How significant is the price gap between these two crossovers?
The 2026 Lincoln Aviator carries an MSRP of $56,910, creating a notable $7,115 cost saving compared to the 2026 Toyota Sequoia, which starts at $64,025.
Does the increased size of the Sequoia translate to significantly more cargo space?
Yes, the Sequoia, being longer (208.1 inches vs 199.7 inches) and taller (74.5 inches vs 69.2 inches), accommodates 22.3 cu ft of cargo volume, offering 3.1 cubic feet more than the Aviator's 19.2 cu ft.
Which vehicle is more economical regarding fuel?
While the Aviator's specific MPG is not detailed, the Sequoia is rated at only 22 combined MPG (21 city/24 highway) running on regular unleaded, suggesting the premium-recommended Aviator will likely be more efficient for daily commuting.
Do both vehicles offer the same drivetrain setup?
Both the 2026 Lincoln Aviator and the 2026 Toyota Sequoia are specified with rear-wheel drive architecture and utilize a 10-speed shiftable automatic transmission.
Is the Sequoia’s engine compatible with less expensive fuel?
The 2026 Toyota Sequoia engine is compatible with regular unleaded fuel, whereas the specifications indicate the 2026 Lincoln Aviator recommends premium unleaded fuel.
More Premium SUVs ($50k-$80k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool