2026 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs 2026 Mazda CX-90
Comparison Overview
The most significant numerical divergence between the 2026 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and the 2026 Mazda CX-90 is the MSRP, with the Evoque priced $11,100 higher at $49,900 compared to the CX-90's $38,800. Despite the lower entry cost, the CX-90 delivers superior raw output, boasting 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque versus the Evoque's 246 hp and 269 lb-ft. Fuel economy slightly favors the Mazda at 25 combined MPG compared to the Evoque's 22 combined MPG, although both use AWD. The Evoque compensates for its lower power figures with greater maneuverability, measuring only 172.1 inches in length, whereas the CX-90 is substantially larger at 200.8 inches. However, the Evoque offers more contained cargo volume at 21.4 cu ft versus the CX-90's 14.9 cu ft.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2026 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Evoque's significantly shorter length of 172.1 inches aids maneuverability and parking in urban commuting environments.
2026 Mazda CX-90
The CX-90's larger overall exterior dimensions and potentially three rows (implied by size comparison) better suit family transport needs.
2026 Mazda CX-90
The Mazda CX-90 offers a substantial performance advantage with 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque compared to the Evoque's 246 hp.
2026 Mazda CX-90
The CX-90 provides 34 more horsepower and better fuel economy (25 combined MPG) for an $11,100 lower starting MSRP.
Choose the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque if...
- You prioritize a lower overall vehicle height (64.9 inches) for garage fit or aesthetic preference.
- You require the slightly larger provided cargo capacity of 21.4 cubic feet.
- You prefer or require premium unleaded fuel usage, characteristic of the Evoque's powertrain.
Choose the Mazda CX-90 if...
- You are seeking the highest power figures, boasting 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque.
- You prioritize maximizing value, saving $11,100 on the MSRP while gaining efficiency and power.
- You need the marginally better fuel economy, achieving 25 combined MPG versus 22 combined MPG.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Mazda CX-90 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 172.1" | 200.8" |
| Width | - | 78.5" |
| Height | 64.9" | 68.3" |
| Wheelbase | 105.6" | 122.8" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Land Rover | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | โ | โ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | โ | โ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | โ | โ |
| Driver Attention Alert | โ | โ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | โ | โ |
| Front Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Rear Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | โ | โ |
| Electronic Stability Control | โ | โ |
| Traction Control System | โ | โ |
| LATCH System | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | โ | โ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Brake Preparation System | โ | โ |
| Brake Assist | โ | โ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | โ | โ |
| Automatic Headlights | โ | โ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | โ | โ |
| LED Headlights | โ | โ |
| Self-Leveling Headlights | โ | โ |
| Daytime Running Lights | โ | โ |
| Front Fog Lights | โ | โ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | โ | โ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | โ | โ |
| Engine Immobilizer | โ | โ |
| Lane Departure Warning | โ | โ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Third Row Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
Engine
| Feature | Land Rover | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.0 L | 3.3 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 6 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | mild hybrid |
| Horsepower | 246 hp @ 5500 rpm | 280 hp @ 5000 rpm |
| Torque | 269 lb-ft @ 1300 rpm | 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 24 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | โ | โ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Land Rover | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 9-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| Hill Descent Control | โ | โ |
| Center Differential Type | โ | Limited Slip |
Fuel
| Feature | Land Rover | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | premium unleaded (recommended) | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 20/27 MPG | 23/28 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 22 MPG | 25 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 354.0/477.9 mi. | 425.5/518.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 17.7 gal. | 18.5 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Land Rover | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | โ | โ |
| Power Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Electric Power Steering | โ | โ |
| Rear View Camera | โ | โ |
| Front Parking Sensors | โ | โ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | โ | โ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | โ | โ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | โ | โ |
| Universal Remote Transmitter | โ | โ |
| Front Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Rear Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Front Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | โ | โ |
| Front Seatback Storage | โ | โ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Heated Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | โ | โ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror | โ | โ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| 3rd Row Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry | โ | โ |
| Three Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Interior Air Filtration | โ | โ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Land Rover | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 11.4 in | 10.3 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | โ | โ |
| Meridian Speakers | โ | โ |
| Stereo Power | 400W | โ |
| Speaker System | 12 | 8 |
| Subwoofer Count | 1 | โ |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | โ | โ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | โ | โ |
| USB Port | โ | โ |
| Satellite Radio | โ | โ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | โ |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | โ | โ |
| Android Auto (Wired) | โ | โ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | โ | โ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | โ | โ |
| Memory Card Slot | โ | โ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Land Rover | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 4 |
| Moonroof Type | 1st Row Power Glass | โ |
| Keyless Entry | โ | โ |
| Heated Mirrors | โ | โ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Land Rover | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 37.4 in. | 39.7 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 40.0 in. | 41.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 56.6 in. | 59.2 in. |
| Seat Material: Leather | โ | โ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | โ | โ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | โ | โ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | Power |
| Driver Seat Memory Settings | 3 | โ |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | 6-way | โ |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | โ | โ |
| Passenger Seat Lumbar Support | Power | โ |
| Driver Seat Heating | Multi-level | โ |
| Passenger Seat Heating | Multi-level | โ |
| Front Hip Room | โ | 56.2 in. |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | โ | โ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | โ | 4-way |
Rearseats
| Feature | Land Rover | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.1 in. | 39.3 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 34.0 in. | 39.4 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 55.4 in. | 58.1 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | โ | โ |
| Folding Center Armrest | โ | โ |
| Rear Hip Room | โ | 55.5 in. |
| Reclining Rear Seats | โ | โ |
| Manual Folding Third Row Seat | โ | โ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Land Rover | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Material | Alloy | Alloy |
| Wheel Size | 18 x 8.0 in | 19 x 8.5 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | R18 | 265/55R19 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
Suspension
| Feature | Land Rover | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | โ | โ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
Warranty
| Feature | Land Rover | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 6 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2026 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2026 Mazda CX-90.
How significant is the power difference between the two crossovers?
The Mazda CX-90 holds a substantial performance edge, producing 280 horsepower and 332 lb-ft of torque. In contrast, the Range Rover Evoque offers 246 horsepower and 269 lb-ft of torque, a deficit of 34 hp.
Which vehicle is better suited for daily urban driving based on size?
The 2026 Range Rover Evoque is significantly smaller, measuring only 172.1 inches in length. The CX-90 is a much larger vehicle at 200.8 inches long, making the Evoque theoretically easier to navigate and park in dense city settings.
Does the higher price of the Evoque translate to better fuel efficiency?
No, the significantly cheaper Mazda CX-90 provides better fuel economy, achieving 25 combined MPG compared to the Evoque's 22 combined MPG. Additionally, the CX-90 uses regular unleaded fuel, whereas the Evoque recommends premium.
How does the cargo capacity compare given the size difference?
Despite being considerably smaller overall (172.1 inches long), the Evoque actually offers more reported cargo space at 21.4 cubic feet compared to the larger CX-90's 14.9 cubic feet.
What is the MSRP gap between the two AWD crossovers?
The 2026 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque commands a starting price of $49,900. This is $11,100 more expensive than the 2026 Mazda CX-90, which begins at $38,800.
Are both vehicles equipped with similar transmissions?
Both vehicles utilize automatic transmissions with manual shift capability, but the Evoque features a 9-speed unit while the CX-90 uses an 8-speed unit.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool