2026 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs 2026 Mazda CX-70

$49,900 · Crossover

$42,250 · Crossover

Comparison Overview

Deciding between the polished prestige of the 2026 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and the sheer practicality of the 2026 Mazda CX-70 is a common dilemma for premium crossover shoppers. The Evoque commands attention with its compact 172.1-inch length and upscale $49,900 MSRP, but it yields power, offering 246 hp and netting only 22 combined MPG. Conversely, the significantly larger Mazda CX-70, which spans a substantial 200.8 inches, undercuts the Evoque by $7,650, starting at $42,250. The Mazda also brings superior performance to the table with 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque, alongside better fuel economy at 25 combined MPG using regular unleaded. Furthermore, the CX-70 offers nearly double the utility, boasting 39.6 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the Evoque's 21.4 cu ft, making it the more robust all-rounder despite the Evoque’s slightly better highway fuel rating (27 vs 28 MPG).

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

🚗 Best for Commuters

2026 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

The Evoque's smaller overall footprint (172.1 inches long) makes it easier to maneuver and park in dense urban environments.

👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Best for Families

2026 Mazda CX-70

The Mazda CX-70 offers substantially more utility with 39.6 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the Evoque's 21.4 cu ft.

🏎️ Best for Enthusiasts

2026 Mazda CX-70

The CX-70 is the clear winner in performance, delivering 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque versus the Evoque's 246 hp and 269 lb-ft of torque.

💰 Best Value

2026 Mazda CX-70

The CX-70 saves buyers $7,650 upfront and uses less expensive regular unleaded fuel while offering better combined MPG (25 vs 22).

Choose the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque if...

You prioritize compact city driving and a shorter overall length of 172.1 inches.
You prefer the prestige and design associated with the Range Rover badge despite the $49,900 price.
You need the slightly better highway fuel economy rating of 27 MPG.

Choose the Mazda CX-70 if...

You need maximum cargo space, as the CX-70 provides 39.6 cu ft versus the Evoque's 21.4 cu ft.
You want significantly more power, boasting 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque.
You want to save $7,650 on the purchase price and opt for less expensive regular unleaded fuel.

Key Dimensions

Dimension	Land Rover Range Rover Evoque	Mazda CX-70
Length	172.1"	200.8"
Width	-	-
Height	64.9"	68.2"
Wheelbase	105.6"	122.8"

Features Comparison

Safety

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Blind Spot Monitor	✓	✓
Lane Keeping Assist System	✓	✓
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	✓	✓
Driver Attention Alert	✓	✓
Pre-Collision Safety System	✓	✓
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags	✓	✓
Front Head Airbags	✓	✓
Rear Head Airbags	✓	✓
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation	✓	✓
Electronic Stability Control	✓	✓
Traction Control System	✓	✓
LATCH System	✓	✓
Rear Door Child Safety Locks	✓	✓
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS)	4-Wheel	4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes	✓	✓
Rear Solid Disc Brakes	✓	—
Brake Preparation System	✓	—
Brake Assist	✓	—
Tire Pressure Monitoring System	✓	✓
Automatic Headlights	✓	✓
Headlight Delay-Off	✓	✓
LED Headlights	✓	✓
Self-Leveling Headlights	✓	✓
Daytime Running Lights	✓	✓
Front Fog Lights	✓	—
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors	✓	✓
Front Headrests	2	2
Front Height Adjustable Headrests	✓	✓
Rear Headrests	3	3
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt	✓	✓
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote)	✓	—
Engine Immobilizer	✓	✓
Lane Departure Warning	—	✓
Post-Collision Safety System	—	✓
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes	—	✓
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests	—	✓

Engine

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Base Engine Displacement	2.0 L	3.3 L
Number of Cylinders	inline 4	inline 6
Base Engine Type	gas	mild hybrid
Horsepower	246 hp @ 5500 rpm	280 hp @ 5000 rpm
Torque	269 lb-ft @ 1300 rpm	332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm
Number of Valves	16	24
Camshaft Type	Double overhead cam (DOHC)	Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing	Variable	Variable
Fuel Injection Type	✓	✓

Drive Train

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Transmission Type	9-speed shiftable automatic	8-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type	all wheel drive	all wheel drive
Hill Descent Control	✓	✓
Center Differential Type	—	Limited Slip

Fuel

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Fuel Type	premium unleaded (recommended)	regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway)	20/27 MPG	24/28 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined)	22 MPG	25 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway)	354.0/477.9 mi.	444.0/518.0 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity	17.7 gal.	18.5 gal.

Comfort & Convenience

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Push Button Start	✓	✓
Power Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel	✓	—
Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Electric Power Steering	✓	✓
Rear View Camera	✓	✓
Front Parking Sensors	✓	✓
Rear Parking Sensors	✓	✓
Wireless Charging Pad	✓	✓
Adaptive Cruise Control	✓	✓
Universal Remote Transmitter	✓	—
Front Cupholders	✓	✓
Rear Cupholders	✓	✓
Front Door Pockets	✓	✓
Rear Door Pockets	✓	✓
Overhead Console with Storage	✓	✓
Front Seatback Storage	✓	✓
Leather Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Heated Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Dual Zone Climate Control	✓	—
Rear Ventilation Ducts	✓	—
Dual Vanity Mirrors	✓	✓
Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror	✓	—
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors	✓	✓
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel	—	✓
Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control	—	✓
Interior Air Filtration	—	✓
Three Zone Climate Control	—	✓

In Car Entertainment

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Infotainment Display	11.4 in	12.3 in
AM/FM Stereo	✓	✓
Meridian Speakers	✓	—
Stereo Power	400W	—
Speaker System	12	8
Subwoofer Count	1	—
Android Auto (Wireless)	✓	✓
Apple CarPlay (Wireless)	✓	✓
USB Port	✓	✓
Satellite Radio	✓	—
Satellite Radio Trial Period	3 months	—
Speed Sensitive Volume Control	✓	✓
USB Port with External Media Control	—	✓

Power Feature

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
One-Touch Power Windows	4	4
Moonroof Type	1st Row Power Glass	1st Row Power Glass
Keyless Entry	✓	✓
Heated Mirrors	✓	✓

Frontseats

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Front Head Room	37.4 in.	39.7 in.
Front Leg Room	40.0 in.	41.7 in.
Front Shoulder Room	56.6 in.	59.2 in.
Seat Material: Leather	✓	✓
Front Seat Type: Bucket	✓	✓
Driver Seat Power Adjustments	8-way	8-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment	✓	✓
Driver Seat Lumbar Support	Power	Power
Driver Seat Memory Settings	3	2
Passenger Seat Power Adjustments	6-way	8-way
Passenger Seat Height Adjustment	✓	✓
Passenger Seat Lumbar Support	Power	—
Driver Seat Heating	Multi-level	Multi-level
Passenger Seat Heating	Multi-level	Multi-level
Front Hip Room	—	56.2 in.
Driver Seat Ventilation	—	✓
Passenger Seat Ventilation	—	✓

Rearseats

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Rear Head Room	38.1 in.	39.3 in.
Rear Leg Room	34.0 in.	39.4 in.
Rear Shoulder Room	55.4 in.	58.1 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback	✓	✓
Folding Center Armrest	✓	✓
Rear Hip Room	—	55.5 in.
Reclining Rear Seats	—	✓
Heated Rear Seats (Multi-Level)	—	✓

Tires and Wheels

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Wheel Material	Alloy	—
Wheel Size	18 x 8.0 in	21 x 9.5 in.
Tire Type	All Season	All Season
Tire Size	R18	275/45R21
Spare Tire Type	Temporary	Temporary
Spare Tire Location	Inside Mounted	Inside Mounted
Wheel Finish	—	Painted Alloy

Suspension

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension	✓	✓
Front Stabilizer Bar	✓	✓
Rear Stabilizer Bar	✓	✓

Warranty

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Basic Warranty	4 yr./ 50000 mi.	3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty	4 yr./ 50000 mi.	5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty	6 yr./ unlimited mi.	5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance	4 yr./ 50000 mi.	3 yr./ 36000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2026 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2026 Mazda CX-70.

Is the 2026 Mazda CX-70 really that much bigger than the Evoque?

Yes, there is a noticeable size difference; the CX-70 has a length of 200.8 inches, making it much longer than the compact Evoque at 172.1 inches. This added length translates directly into the CX-70's massive advantage in cargo space, providing 39.6 cu ft versus the Evoque's 21.4 cu ft.

How significant is the horsepower difference between these two AWD crossovers?

The difference is quite tangible: the CX-70 boasts 280 hp, which is 34 hp more than the Evoque's 246 hp output. Additionally, the Mazda offers substantially more pulling power with 332 lb-ft of torque compared to the Land Rover's 269 lb-ft.

Which vehicle is more economical for fuel costs?

The Mazda CX-70 is generally more economical; it achieves a 25 combined MPG and runs on regular unleaded gasoline. The Evoque manages 22 combined MPG and requires premium unleaded, increasing running costs.

Does the Range Rover Evoque's size impact its fuel efficiency?

While the Evoque is smaller, its 22 combined MPG is lower than the CX-70's 25 MPG, despite the Evoque having slightly better highway numbers (27 MPG vs 28 MPG for the Mazda). The Evoque also recommends premium fuel, which impacts the real-world cost per mile.

What is the price gap for buyers cross-shopping these two?

There is a $7,650 difference in starting MSRP, with the 2026 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque priced at $49,900 and the 2026 Mazda CX-70 significantly lower at $42,250.

If I drive exclusively on freeways, does the Evoque make up any ground?

The Evoque closes the efficiency gap slightly on the highway, rating at 27 MPG compared to the CX-70's 28 MPG. However, for city driving, the Mazda still holds a slight edge (24 MPG vs. 20 MPG).