2026 Hyundai Kona vs 2026 Mazda CX-50
Comparison Overview
The most significant numerical divergence between the 2026 Hyundai Kona and the 2026 Mazda CX-50 is the $4,550 difference in starting MSRP, with the Kona beginning at $25,350 versus the CX-50’s $29,900. This price gap reflects substantial mechanical differences; the CX-50 delivers 187 hp and 185 lb-ft of torque, significantly outpacing the Kona's 147 hp and 132 lb-ft. Conversely, the Kona excels in efficiency, achieving a combined 31 MPG compared to the CX-50’s 26 MPG, despite the Mazda featuring standard All-Wheel Drive. Dimensionally, the CX-50 offers substantially more utility, boasting 31.4 cu ft of cargo capacity against the Kona’s 25.5 cu ft. These metrics highlight a clear trade-off between efficiency and base power/size in this comparison.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2026 Hyundai Kona
The 2026 Kona wins for commuters due to its superior fuel economy, achieving 31 combined MPG versus the CX-50's 26 MPG.
2026 Mazda CX-50
The CX-50 is better suited for families because it provides 31.4 cu ft of cargo capacity, significantly exceeding the Kona's 25.5 cu ft.
2026 Mazda CX-50
Enthusiasts will favor the CX-50, which produces 187 hp and 185 lb-ft of torque compared to the Kona's 147 hp and 132 lb-ft.
2026 Hyundai Kona
The Kona offers better upfront value, starting $4,550 lower than the CX-50 while still utilizing regular unleaded fuel.
Choose the Hyundai Kona if...
- Your primary concern is minimizing fuel costs, capitalizing on the 31 combined MPG rating.
- You require the lowest possible starting price point at $25,350.
- You prefer a smaller footprint, with a length of 171.3 inches, making it easier to navigate tight spaces.
Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...
- You need greater all-weather capability provided by the standard All-Wheel Drive system.
- You prioritize raw output, leveraging the 187 hp and 185 lb-ft of torque.
- Maximum utility is necessary, as indicated by the 31.4 cu ft of cargo space.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Hyundai Kona | Mazda CX-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 171.3" | 185.8" |
| Width | 71.9" | 75.6" |
| Height | 62.2" | 63.5" |
| Wheelbase | 104.7" | 110.8" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Hyundai | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | — |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | — | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Hyundai | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.0 L | 2.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 147 hp @ 6200 rpm | 187 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 132 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm | 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | — | ✓ |
| Cylinder Deactivation | — | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Hyundai | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | continuously variable-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | front wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| Hill Descent Control | ✓ | — |
Fuel
| Feature | Hyundai | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 29/34 MPG | 24/30 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 31 MPG | 26 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 359.6/421.6 mi. | 381.6/477.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 12.4 gal. | 15.9 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Hyundai | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | ✓ | — |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Extended Cabin Heating/Cooling | ✓ | — |
| Driver Vanity Mirror | ✓ | — |
| Wireless Charging Pad | — | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | — | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | — | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | — | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | — | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Hyundai | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 12.3 in | 10.3 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 8 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | — |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | — |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | — |
| Android Auto (Wired) | — | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Hyundai | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 1 | 4 |
| Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Hyundai | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 39.9 in. | 39.1 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.7 in. | 41.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 56.8 in. | 55.9 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 54.3 in. | 53.6 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | — | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | — | 4-way |
Rearseats
| Feature | Hyundai | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.3 in. | 38.6 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 38.2 in. | 39.8 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 55.2 in. | 53.6 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 52.4 in. | 52.1 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | ✓ | — |
| Folding Center Armrest | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Hyundai | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Material | Alloy | — |
| Wheel Size | 17 x 7.0 in | 17 x 7.0 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 215/60R17 | P225/65R17 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Finish | — | Painted Alloy |
Suspension
| Feature | Hyundai | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | Independent |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Hyundai | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 10 yr./ 100000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 7 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2026 Hyundai Kona and 2026 Mazda CX-50.
What is the total difference in power output between the 2026 Kona and the 2026 CX-50?
The 2026 Mazda CX-50 offers a notable advantage in performance, generating 187 horsepower and 185 lb-ft of torque. This is 40 more horsepower and 53 more lb-ft of torque than the 2026 Hyundai Kona’s 147 hp and 132 lb-ft.
How much more cargo room does the CX-50 offer over the Kona?
The CX-50 provides significantly more space for hauling gear, boasting 31.4 cubic feet of cargo capacity. This is nearly 6 cubic feet more than the Kona’s 25.5 cubic feet.
Is the fuel efficiency sacrifice worth the standard AWD on the Mazda CX-50?
The Kona is considerably more frugal, delivering 31 combined MPG (29 city/34 highway) on FWD, while the AWD CX-50 nets only 26 combined MPG (24 city/30 highway). Buyers must weigh the cost of fuel savings against the benefit of standard AWD.
What specific mechanical transmission difference exists between these two crossovers?
The Kona utilizes a continuously variable-speed automatic transmission (CVT) designed for efficiency. In contrast, the more powerful CX-50 employs a 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission.
Which vehicle has a higher starting price, and by how much?
The 2026 Mazda CX-50 has the higher starting MSRP at $29,900. This makes it $4,550 more expensive than the base 2026 Hyundai Kona, which starts at $25,350.
Are there major differences in external size affecting maneuverability?
Yes, the CX-50 is the larger vehicle, measuring 185.8 inches long and 75.6 inches wide. The Kona is more compact at 171.3 inches long and 71.9 inches wide, potentially offering better maneuverability for city driving.
More Budget SUVs Under $30,000
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool