2026 Ford Maverick vs 2026 Mazda CX-30
Comparison Overview
The primary divergence between the 2026 Ford Maverick and the 2026 Mazda CX-30 lies in fuel economy, where the Maverick achieves a 38 combined MPG compared to the CX-30's 27 combined MPG, an 11 MPG advantage. Priced at $28,145, the Maverick carries a higher MSRP than the CX-30's $25,975. However, the Maverick offers significantly more exterior bulk at 199.8 inches long and 72.6 inches wide, contrasting with the CX-30's compact 173.0 inches length. Performance metrics show the Maverick producing 191 hp and 155 lb-ft of torque from its FWD configuration, while the AWD CX-30 trades overall efficiency for superior torque delivery at 186 lb-ft, despite producing slightly less horsepower at 186 hp. The drivetrain differences—Maverick's CVT versus CX-30's 6-speed automatic—also dictate their driving feel and intended utility.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2026 Ford Maverick
The 2026 Ford Maverick wins for commuters due to its superior combined fuel economy of 38 MPG.
2026 Mazda CX-30
The Mazda CX-30 offers standard All-Wheel Drive and a more manageable exterior footprint for urban parking compared to the larger Maverick.
2026 Mazda CX-30
The CX-30's higher torque output of 186 lb-ft paired with a traditional 6-speed automatic transmission favors spirited driving dynamics over the Maverick's efficiency-focused setup.
2026 Mazda CX-30
Despite the Maverick's efficiency, the Mazda CX-30 presents better immediate value with a $2,170 lower starting MSRP.
Choose the Ford Maverick if...
- Fuel efficiency is the absolute priority, as indicated by the 38 combined MPG rating.
- A significantly longer vehicle (199.8 inches) is required for specific hauling or space needs.
- The driver prefers a front-wheel-drive platform utilizing an electrically variable-speed automatic transmission.
Choose the Mazda CX-30 if...
- Standard All-Wheel Drive capability is necessary for varied driving conditions.
- A lower initial investment, starting at $25,975, is preferred over the Maverick's $28,145 MSRP.
- The driver prioritizes higher low-end pulling power with 186 lb-ft of torque and a conventional 6-speed automatic.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Maverick | Mazda CX-30 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 199.8" | 173.0" |
| Width | 72.6" | 70.7" |
| Height | 68.8" | 61.4" |
| Wheelbase | 121.1" | 104.4" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | — |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Blind Spot Monitor | — | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | — | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | — | ✓ |
| Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags | — | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | — | ✓ |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.5 L | 2.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | hybrid | gas |
| Horsepower | 191 hp @ 5600 rpm | 186 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 155 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 186 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | — | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | electrically variable-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | front wheel drive | all wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 42/35 MPG | 24/31 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 38 MPG | 27 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 579.6/483.0 mi. | 304.8/393.7 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 13.8 gal. | 12.7 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | — |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | — |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | — |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Push Button Start | — | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 13.2 in | 8.8 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 8 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 1 | 4 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 40.2 in. | 38.1 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 42.8 in. | 41.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.3 in. | 55.6 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 55.4 in. | 54.6 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.6 in. | 38.3 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 35.9 in. | 36.3 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 55.6 in. | 53.6 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 54.1 in. | 53.2 in. |
| Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | — |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | — | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Steel | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Diameter | 17 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | P225/65R17 | 215/65R16 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Underbody Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Size | — | 16 x 6.5 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | Independent |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2026 Ford Maverick and 2026 Mazda CX-30.
How does the cargo capacity compare between the 2026 Maverick and the CX-30?
The provided specifications only list cargo capacity for the 2026 Mazda CX-30 at 20.2 cubic feet. The specific cargo volume for the 2026 Ford Maverick crossover body type was not provided for a direct comparison.
Which vehicle provides better highway mileage for long commutes?
The 2026 Ford Maverick leads in highway efficiency, achieving 35 MPG on the highway versus the 2026 Mazda CX-30's 31 MPG highway rating.
Is the higher horsepower in the Maverick enough to overcome the CX-30's torque advantage?
The Maverick has 191 hp compared to the CX-30's 186 hp, but the CX-30 produces 186 lb-ft of torque, significantly higher than the Maverick's 155 lb-ft, suggesting better acceleration potential off the line for the Mazda.
What are the fundamental drivetrain differences influencing traction?
The Maverick is configured with standard front-wheel drive (FWD), while the Mazda CX-30 features an All-Wheel Drive (AWD) system, which typically offers superior traction in low-grip scenarios.
How does the physical size difference impact maneuverability?
The CX-30 is notably shorter at 173.0 inches and narrower at 70.7 inches than the Maverick (199.8 inches long and 72.6 inches wide), generally resulting in easier maneuvering and tighter turning radii for the smaller Mazda.
What type of fuel do both vehicles use?
Both the 2026 Ford Maverick and the 2026 Mazda CX-30 are designed to run on regular unleaded fuel, requiring no premium grade gasoline.
More Budget SUVs Under $30,000
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool