2026 Ford Escape vs 2026 Mazda CX-70

Ford Escape

$30,350 ยท Crossover

vs
Mazda CX-70

$42,250 ยท Crossover

Comparison Overview

The primary disparity between the 2026 Ford Escape and the 2026 Mazda CX-70 is the $11,900 MSRP gap, starting at $30,350 for the Escape versus $42,250 for the CX-70. This price difference correlates with significant performance variations; the CX-70 delivers 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque, substantially outperforming the Escape's 180 hp and 199 lb-ft. Fuel economy favors the Escape, achieving 30 combined MPG (27/34 City/Highway) compared to the CX-70โ€™s 25 combined MPG (24/28). The Mazda is a larger vehicle, measuring 200.8 inches in length versus the Escape's 180.1 inches, yet the Escape offers slightly less cargo space at 37.5 cu ft compared to the CX-70's 39.6 cu ft. Furthermore, the CX-70 includes standard All-Wheel Drive (AWD) while the Escape utilizes Front Wheel Drive (FWD).

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

๐Ÿš— Best for Commuters

2026 Ford Escape

The Ford Escape wins for commuters due to its superior 30 combined MPG efficiency rating, minimizing long-term fuel expenditure.

๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ‘งโ€๐Ÿ‘ฆ Best for Families

2026 Mazda CX-70

The Mazda CX-70 provides more overall size, with a longer 200.8-inch frame and greater 39.6 cu ft of cargo capacity for family utility.

๐ŸŽ๏ธ Best for Enthusiasts

2026 Mazda CX-70

The Mazda CX-70 is the clear performance leader, boasting a significant 100 hp advantage with 280 hp and standard AWD.

๐Ÿ’ฐ Best Value

2026 Ford Escape

The Ford Escape provides better entry-level value by being $11,900 cheaper while still delivering respectable efficiency and utility figures.

Choose the Ford Escape if...

  • Your primary concern is minimizing running costs, highlighted by the 30 combined MPG rating.
  • You require a lower initial purchase price, starting at the $30,350 MSRP.
  • Standard FWD configuration is sufficient for your typical driving conditions.

Choose the Mazda CX-70 if...

  • Maximum performance is desired, evidenced by the 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque figures.
  • You need the added traction and stability of the standard All-Wheel Drive system.
  • You prioritize maximum cargo utility, offering 39.6 cu ft compared to the Escape's 37.5 cu ft.

Key Dimensions

Dimension Ford Escape Mazda CX-70
Length 180.1" 200.8"
Width 74.1" -
Height 66.0" 68.2"
Wheelbase 106.7" 122.8"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Ford Mazda
Blind Spot Monitor โœ“ โœ“
Lane Departure Warning โœ“ โœ“
Lane Keeping Assist System โœ“ โœ“
Rear Cross Traffic Alert โœ“ โœ“
Driver Attention Alert โœ“ โœ“
Pre-Collision Safety System โœ“ โœ“
Post-Collision Safety System โœ“ โœ“
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Front Head Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Rear Head Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Electronic Stability Control โœ“ โœ“
Traction Control System โœ“ โœ“
LATCH System โœ“ โœ“
Rear Door Child Safety Locks โœ“ โœ“
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes โœ“ โœ“
Rear Solid Disc Brakes โœ“ โ€”
Brake Preparation System โœ“ โ€”
Brake Assist โœ“ โ€”
Tire Pressure Monitoring System โœ“ โœ“
Automatic Headlights โœ“ โœ“
Headlight Delay-Off โœ“ โœ“
LED Headlights โœ“ โœ“
Daytime Running Lights โœ“ โœ“
Front Headrests 2 2
Front Height Adjustable Headrests โœ“ โœ“
Rear Headrests 3 3
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests โœ“ โœ“
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt โœ“ โœ“
Engine Immobilizer โœ“ โœ“
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation โ€” โœ“
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes โ€” โœ“
Self-Leveling Headlights โ€” โœ“
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors โ€” โœ“
Engine
Feature Ford Mazda
Base Engine Displacement 1.5 L 3.3 L
Number of Cylinders inline 3 inline 6
Base Engine Type gas mild hybrid
Horsepower 180 hp @ 6000 rpm 280 hp @ 5000 rpm
Torque 199 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm
Number of Valves 12 24
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type โœ“ โœ“
Cylinder Deactivation โœ“ โ€”
Drive Train
Feature Ford Mazda
Transmission Type 8-speed automatic 8-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type front wheel drive all wheel drive
Center Differential Type โ€” Limited Slip
Hill Descent Control โ€” โœ“
Fuel
Feature Ford Mazda
Fuel Type regular unleaded regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 27/34 MPG 24/28 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 30 MPG 25 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 399.6/503.2 mi. 444.0/518.0 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 14.8 gal. 18.5 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Ford Mazda
Push Button Start โœ“ โœ“
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Electric Power Steering โœ“ โœ“
Rear View Camera โœ“ โœ“
Cruise Control โœ“ โ€”
Front Cupholders โœ“ โœ“
Rear Cupholders โœ“ โœ“
Front Door Pockets โœ“ โœ“
Rear Door Pockets โœ“ โœ“
Overhead Console with Storage โœ“ โœ“
Front Seatback Storage โœ“ โœ“
Steering Wheel Material Alloy โ€”
Dual Zone Climate Control โœ“ โ€”
Interior Air Filtration โœ“ โœ“
Dual Vanity Mirrors โœ“ โœ“
Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel โ€” โœ“
Front Parking Sensors โ€” โœ“
Rear Parking Sensors โ€” โœ“
Wireless Charging Pad โ€” โœ“
Adaptive Cruise Control โ€” โœ“
Leather Steering Wheel โ€” โœ“
Heated Steering Wheel โ€” โœ“
Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control โ€” โœ“
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors โ€” โœ“
Three Zone Climate Control โ€” โœ“
In Car Entertainment
Feature Ford Mazda
Infotainment Display 8.0 in 12.3 in
AM/FM Stereo โœ“ โœ“
Speaker System 6 8
Android Auto (Wireless) โœ“ โœ“
Apple CarPlay (Wireless) โœ“ โœ“
USB Port โœ“ โœ“
USB Port with External Media Control โœ“ โœ“
Satellite Radio โœ“ โ€”
Satellite Radio Trial Period 3 months โ€”
Speed Sensitive Volume Control โœ“ โœ“
Power Feature
Feature Ford Mazda
One-Touch Power Windows 1 4
Keyless Entry โœ“ โœ“
Heated Mirrors โœ“ โœ“
Moonroof Type โ€” 1st Row Power Glass
Frontseats
Feature Ford Mazda
Front Head Room 40.0 in. 39.7 in.
Front Leg Room 42.4 in. 41.7 in.
Front Shoulder Room 57.6 in. 59.2 in.
Front Hip Room 55.2 in. 56.2 in.
Seat Material: Premium Cloth โœ“ โ€”
Front Seat Type: Bucket โœ“ โœ“
Driver Seat Manual Adjustments 6-way โ€”
Driver Seat Height Adjustment โœ“ โœ“
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments 4-way โ€”
Seat Material: Leather โ€” โœ“
Driver Seat Power Adjustments โ€” 8-way
Driver Seat Lumbar Support โ€” Power
Driver Seat Memory Settings โ€” 2
Passenger Seat Power Adjustments โ€” 8-way
Passenger Seat Height Adjustment โ€” โœ“
Driver Seat Heating โ€” Multi-level
Passenger Seat Heating โ€” Multi-level
Driver Seat Ventilation โ€” โœ“
Passenger Seat Ventilation โ€” โœ“
Rearseats
Feature Ford Mazda
Rear Head Room 39.3 in. 39.3 in.
Rear Leg Room 40.7 in. 39.4 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 56.0 in. 58.1 in.
Rear Hip Room 53.3 in. 55.5 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback โœ“ โœ“
Folding Center Armrest โœ“ โœ“
Reclining Rear Seats โ€” โœ“
Heated Rear Seats (Multi-Level) โ€” โœ“
Tires and Wheels
Feature Ford Mazda
Wheel Finish Painted Alloy Painted Alloy
Wheel Diameter 17 in โ€”
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size 225/65R H 275/45R21
Wheel Size โ€” 21 x 9.5 in.
Spare Tire Type โ€” Temporary
Spare Tire Location โ€” Inside Mounted
Suspension
Feature Ford Mazda
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension โœ“ โœ“
Front Stabilizer Bar โœ“ โœ“
Rear Stabilizer Bar โœ“ โœ“
Warranty
Feature Ford Mazda
Basic Warranty 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Hybrid Component Warranty 8 yr./ 100000 mi. โ€”
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 5 yr./ unlimited mi. 5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2026 Ford Escape and 2026 Mazda CX-70.

What is the primary cost difference between the 2026 Ford Escape and the 2026 Mazda CX-70?

The 2026 Mazda CX-70 has an MSRP of $42,250, which is $11,900 more expensive than the 2026 Ford Escape starting at $30,350. This substantial upfront cost difference reflects the significant upgrades in performance and size offered by the CX-70.

How significant is the performance gap between the two crossovers?

The performance gap is very pronounced, with the CX-70 producing 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque compared to the Escape's 180 hp and 199 lb-ft. This 100 hp difference positions the CX-70 as the performance choice, even though both use an 8-speed automatic transmission.

Which vehicle is more fuel-efficient for daily commuting?

The Ford Escape offers demonstrably better fuel economy, achieving a combined rating of 30 MPG versus the CX-70's 25 combined MPG. Commuters will notice the Escape's 34 MPG highway rating versus the CX-70's 28 MPG highway rating.

Does drivetrain type differ between the 2026 models?

Yes, the listed specifications show the Ford Escape comes standard with Front Wheel Drive (FWD). In contrast, the Mazda CX-70 comes equipped with All Wheel Drive (AWD), impacting handling capabilities in varied weather.

Is the larger Mazda CX-70 better for hauling cargo?

The Mazda CX-70 is physically larger overall, measuring 200.8 inches in length compared to the Escape's 180.1 inches. This translates to a marginally better cargo capacity, offering 39.6 cu ft against the Escape's 37.5 cu ft.

Are both vehicles restricted to regular unleaded gasoline?

Yes, based on the provided specifications, both the 2026 Ford Escape and the 2026 Mazda CX-70 are listed as using regular unleaded fuel, avoiding the necessity for premium octane.

More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool