2026 Ford Bronco vs 2026 Mazda CX-70

$40,495 · SUV

$42,250 · Crossover

Comparison Overview

The most significant numerical disparity between the 2026 Ford Bronco and the 2026 Mazda CX-70 is fuel economy, with the CX-70 achieving 25 combined MPG compared to the Bronco's 19 combined MPG, a difference of 6 MPG. The Mazda also boasts superior rear space, offering 39.6 cu ft of cargo capacity versus the Bronco's 20.6 cu ft. However, the Bronco delivers higher output with 300 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque, slightly surpassing the CX-70's 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque, although the Mazda's peak torque advantage is numerically present. Priced at $40,495, the Bronco undercuts the CX-70's MSRP of $42,250. Furthermore, the Bronco utilizes a less efficient premium unleaded fuel alongside its 7-speed manual transmission, whereas the CX-70 runs on regular unleaded and utilizes an 8-speed automatic.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

🚗 Best for Commuters

2026 Mazda CX-70

The Mazda CX-70 is the superior commuter vehicle due to its substantial 25 combined MPG rating versus the Bronco's 19 MPG.

👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Best for Families

2026 Mazda CX-70

The CX-70 offers nearly double the utility with 39.6 cu ft of cargo space compared to the Bronco's 20.6 cu ft.

🏎️ Best for Enthusiasts

2026 Ford Bronco

The Ford Bronco is geared toward enthusiasts with its dedicated four-wheel drive system and a 7-speed manual transmission.

💰 Best Value

2026 Ford Bronco

The Bronco presents a lower entry cost at $40,495, directly undercutting the CX-70's $42,250 MSRP.

Choose the Ford Bronco if...

Your driving style prioritizes engagement through the use of a 7-speed manual transmission.
You require a robust four-wheel drive system for off-pavement use.
You need the lowest initial purchase price, starting at $40,495.

Choose the Mazda CX-70 if...

Fuel cost savings are paramount, evidenced by its 25 combined MPG rating.
You frequently haul cargo, utilizing its significant 39.6 cu ft capacity.
You prefer the lower operational cost associated with regular unleaded fuel.

Key Dimensions

Dimension	Ford Bronco	Mazda CX-70
Length	173.7"	200.8"
Width	75.9"	-
Height	71.9"	68.2"
Wheelbase	100.4"	122.8"

Features Comparison

Safety

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Pre-Collision Safety System	✓	✓
Post-Collision Safety System	✓	✓
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags	✓	✓
Front Head Airbags	✓	✓
Rear Head Airbags	✓	✓
Electronic Stability Control	✓	✓
Traction Control System	✓	✓
LATCH System	✓	✓
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS)	4-Wheel	4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes	✓	✓
Rear Solid Disc Brakes	✓	—
Brake Preparation System	✓	—
Brake Assist	✓	—
Tire Pressure Monitoring System	✓	✓
Automatic Headlights	✓	✓
Headlight Delay-Off	✓	✓
LED Headlights	✓	✓
Daytime Running Lights	✓	✓
Front Headrests	2	2
Rear Headrests	2	3
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote)	✓	—
Blind Spot Monitor	—	✓
Lane Departure Warning	—	✓
Lane Keeping Assist System	—	✓
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	—	✓
Driver Attention Alert	—	✓
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation	—	✓
Rear Door Child Safety Locks	—	✓
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes	—	✓
Self-Leveling Headlights	—	✓
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors	—	✓
Front Height Adjustable Headrests	—	✓
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests	—	✓
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt	—	✓
Engine Immobilizer	—	✓

Engine

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Base Engine Displacement	2.3 L	3.3 L
Number of Cylinders	inline 4	inline 6
Base Engine Type	gas	mild hybrid
Horsepower	300 hp @ 5700 rpm	280 hp @ 5000 rpm
Torque	325 lb-ft @ 3400 rpm	332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm
Number of Valves	16	24
Camshaft Type	Double overhead cam (DOHC)	Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing	Variable	Variable
Fuel Injection Type	✓	✓

Drive Train

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Transmission Type	7-speed manual	8-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type	four wheel drive	all wheel drive
4WD System Type	Part Time	—
Transfer Case Gearing	Electronic Hi-Lo	—
Locking Hubs	Automatic	—
[object Object]	✓	—
[object Object]	✓	—
Hill Descent Control	✓	✓
Center Differential Type	—	Limited Slip

Fuel

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Fuel Type	premium unleaded (recommended)	regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway)	18/21 MPG	24/28 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined)	19 MPG	25 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway)	304.2/354.9 mi.	444.0/518.0 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity	16.9 gal.	18.5 gal.

Comfort & Convenience

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Push Button Start	✓	✓
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Electric Power Steering	✓	✓
Rear View Camera	✓	✓
Cruise Control	✓	—
Front Cupholders	✓	✓
Rear Cupholders	✓	✓
Front Door Pockets	✓	✓
Overhead Console with Storage	✓	✓
Single Zone Climate Control	✓	—
Interior Air Filtration	✓	✓
Dual Vanity Mirrors	✓	✓
Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel	—	✓
Front Parking Sensors	—	✓
Rear Parking Sensors	—	✓
Wireless Charging Pad	—	✓
Adaptive Cruise Control	—	✓
Rear Door Pockets	—	✓
Front Seatback Storage	—	✓
Leather Steering Wheel	—	✓
Heated Steering Wheel	—	✓
Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control	—	✓
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors	—	✓
Three Zone Climate Control	—	✓

In Car Entertainment

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Infotainment Display	12.0 in	12.3 in
AM/FM Stereo	✓	✓
Speaker System	7	8
Subwoofer Count	1	—
Android Auto (Wireless)	✓	✓
Apple CarPlay (Wireless)	✓	✓
USB Port	✓	✓
USB Port with External Media Control	✓	✓
Satellite Radio	✓	—
Satellite Radio Trial Period	3 months	—
Speed Sensitive Volume Control	—	✓

Power Feature

Feature	Ford	Mazda
One-Touch Power Windows	2	4
Remote Keyless Entry	✓	—
Heated Mirrors	✓	✓
Moonroof Type	—	1st Row Power Glass
Keyless Entry	—	✓

Frontseats

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Front Head Room	41.0 in.	39.7 in.
Front Leg Room	43.1 in.	41.7 in.
Front Shoulder Room	57.1 in.	59.2 in.
Front Hip Room	56.3 in.	56.2 in.
Seat Material: Cloth	✓	—
Front Seat Type: Bucket	✓	✓
Driver Seat Manual Adjustments	6-way	—
Driver Seat Height Adjustment	✓	✓
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments	6-way	—
Passenger Seat Height Adjustment	✓	✓
Seat Material: Leather	—	✓
Driver Seat Power Adjustments	—	8-way
Driver Seat Lumbar Support	—	Power
Driver Seat Memory Settings	—	2
Passenger Seat Power Adjustments	—	8-way
Driver Seat Heating	—	Multi-level
Passenger Seat Heating	—	Multi-level
Driver Seat Ventilation	—	✓
Passenger Seat Ventilation	—	✓

Rearseats

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Rear Head Room	39.8 in.	39.3 in.
Rear Leg Room	35.7 in.	39.4 in.
Rear Shoulder Room	51.8 in.	58.1 in.
Rear Hip Room	43.3 in.	55.5 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback	✓	✓
Reclining Rear Seats	—	✓
Folding Center Armrest	—	✓
Heated Rear Seats (Multi-Level)	—	✓

Tires and Wheels

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Wheel Finish	Painted Steel	Painted Alloy
Wheel Diameter	16 in	—
Tire Type	All Season	All Season
Tire Size	255/70R16	275/45R21
Spare Tire Type	Full Size Matching	Temporary
Spare Tire Location	Outside Rear Mounted	Inside Mounted
Wheel Size	—	21 x 9.5 in.

Suspension

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Front Suspension Type	Independent	—
Stabilizer Bar	✓	—
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension	—	✓
Front Stabilizer Bar	—	✓
Rear Stabilizer Bar	—	✓

Warranty

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Basic Warranty	3 yr./ 36000 mi.	3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty	5 yr./ 60000 mi.	5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty	5 yr./ unlimited mi.	5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance	5 yr./ 60000 mi.	3 yr./ 36000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2026 Ford Bronco and 2026 Mazda CX-70.

What is the key performance difference based on horsepower and torque?

The 2026 Ford Bronco offers slightly more peak power with 300 hp, while the 2026 Mazda CX-70 generates marginally more torque at 332 lb-ft versus the Bronco's 325 lb-ft.

How much longer is the CX-70 compared to the Bronco?

The Mazda CX-70 has a considerable overall length of 200.8 inches, making it 27.1 inches longer than the Bronco's 173.7-inch length.

Which vehicle requires a more expensive fuel type?

The Ford Bronco recommends premium unleaded fuel, which typically carries a higher per-gallon cost than the regular unleaded required by the Mazda CX-70.

Is the difference in height significant for garage storage?

Yes, the Bronco stands taller at 71.9 inches, whereas the CX-70 is lower at 68.2 inches, which might be a deciding factor for low-clearance garages.

Which vehicle is better suited for long highway commutes?

The CX-70 is better for extended highway travel, achieving 28 MPG highway with its automatic transmission compared to the Bronco's 21 MPG highway using a manual transmission.