2026 Ford Bronco vs 2026 Honda CR-V
Comparison Overview
The comparison between the 2026 Ford Bronco and the 2026 Honda CR-V reveals divergent priorities, starting with the substantial $9,575 MSRP difference ($40,495 vs $30,920). Power output shows a 110 hp gap, with the Bronco delivering 300 hp against the CR-V's 190 hp, backed by 325 lb-ft of torque versus 179 lb-ft. Conversely, the CR-V excels in efficiency, offering a 30 combined MPG compared to the Bronco's 19 combined MPG. Furthermore, cargo volume strongly favors the crossover, yielding 39.3 cu ft compared to the Bronco's 20.6 cu ft. While the Bronco utilizes a robust 7-speed manual transmission and 4WD, the CR-V employs a CVT with standard FWD, emphasizing capability over economy.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2026 Honda CR-V
The Honda CR-V wins for commuters due to its superior 30 combined MPG and lower running costs from using regular unleaded fuel.
2026 Honda CR-V
The CR-V provides significantly more utility with 39.3 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the Bronco's 20.6 cu ft.
2026 Ford Bronco
The Bronco appeals more to enthusiasts by offering 300 hp, 325 lb-ft of torque, and a 7-speed manual transmission.
2026 Honda CR-V
The CR-V offers substantial cost savings with an $9,575 lower starting MSRP and 11 MPG better fuel economy.
Choose the Ford Bronco if...
- You require maximum off-road capability via four-wheel drive.
- A 7-speed manual transmission is essential for driving engagement.
- High torque figures (325 lb-ft) and 300 horsepower are mandatory for performance needs.
Choose the Honda CR-V if...
- Fuel economy is critical, given the 11 MPG advantage (30 combined MPG).
- Maximizing interior storage is necessary, as it offers 39.3 cu ft of cargo space.
- A lower initial investment is preferred, with an MSRP starting at $30,920.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Bronco | Honda CR-V |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 173.7" | 184.8" |
| Width | 75.9" | 73.5" |
| Height | 71.9" | 66.2" |
| Wheelbase | 100.4" | 106.3" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Rear Headrests | 2 | 3 |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | — | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | — | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | — | ✓ |
| Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags | — | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | — | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | — | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | — | ✓ |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | — | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.3 L | 1.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 300 hp @ 5700 rpm | 190 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 325 lb-ft @ 3400 rpm | 179 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 7-speed manual | continuously variable-speed automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | four wheel drive | front wheel drive |
| 4WD System Type | Part Time | — |
| Transfer Case Gearing | Electronic Hi-Lo | — |
| Locking Hubs | Automatic | — |
| [object Object] | ✓ | — |
| [object Object] | ✓ | — |
| Hill Descent Control | ✓ | ✓ |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | premium unleaded (recommended) | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 18/21 MPG | 28/33 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 19 MPG | 30 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 304.2/354.9 mi. | 392.0/462.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 16.9 gal. | 14.0 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | — | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | — | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 12.0 in | 9.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 7 | 4 |
| Subwoofer Count | 1 | — |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | — |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | — |
| Stereo Power | — | 160W |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 2 | 1 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 41.0 in. | 40.0 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 43.1 in. | 41.3 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.1 in. | 57.9 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 56.3 in. | 55.6 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | — |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | — |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | — |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.8 in. | 38.2 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 35.7 in. | 41.0 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 51.8 in. | 55.9 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 43.3 in. | 52.6 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | — | ✓ |
| Folding Center Armrest | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Steel | — |
| Wheel Diameter | 16 in | 17 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 255/70R16 | 235/65R |
| Spare Tire Type | Full Size Matching | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Outside Rear Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Material | — | Steel |
| Wheel Cover Type | — | ✓ |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | — |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | — | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | — | 1 yr./ 12000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2026 Ford Bronco and 2026 Honda CR-V.
What is the primary difference in powertrain between the 2026 Bronco and CR-V?
The 2026 Ford Bronco is geared toward rugged performance, featuring 300 horsepower and a specialized 7-speed manual transmission with four-wheel drive. In contrast, the 2026 Honda CR-V focuses on efficiency, utilizing a 190 horsepower engine paired with a continuously variable-speed automatic transmission and standard front-wheel drive.
How much greater is the fuel cost difference between these two vehicles?
The CR-V achieves 30 combined MPG while the Bronco is rated at 19 combined MPG, creating an 11 MPG efficiency gap. Additionally, the Bronco recommends premium unleaded fuel, whereas the CR-V uses regular unleaded, further impacting long-term operating expenses.
Which vehicle offers better utility for carrying cargo?
The Honda CR-V is the definitive winner for cargo hauling, offering 39.3 cubic feet of space. The 2026 Ford Bronco provides substantially less utility, measuring only 20.6 cubic feet of available cargo capacity.
Is the Bronco considerably larger than the CR-V?
Yes, the Bronco has a distinct footprint, measuring 173.7 inches long compared to the CR-V's 184.8 inches in length. However, the Bronco is taller at 71.9 inches versus the CR-V's 66.2 inches, indicative of its off-road stance.
What accounts for the $9,575 MSRP gap between the two models?
The price difference reflects the Bronco's higher performance metrics (300 hp, 325 lb-ft torque), standard 4WD, and rugged build appealing to a niche audience. The CR-V's lower $30,920 MSRP reflects its positioning as an efficient, FWD-based compact crossover focused on economy.
Can the CR-V handle adverse road conditions as well as the Bronco?
No, the Bronco comes standard with a four-wheel drive system designed for challenging terrain. The standard CR-V comes with front-wheel drive, prioritizing on-road manners over extreme off-road capability.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool