2026 Chevrolet Trax vs 2026 Mazda CX-50
Comparison Overview
The most significant numerical divergence between the 2026 Chevrolet Trax and the 2026 Mazda CX-50 is the $8,300 MSRP gap, starting the Trax at $21,600 versus the CX-50’s $29,900. This price difference underpins most trade-offs, particularly in performance and utility. The CX-50 delivers substantially more power, boasting 187 hp and 185 lb-ft of torque compared to the Trax's 137 hp and 162 lb-ft. Conversely, the Trax is notably more economical, achieving a 30 MPG combined rating versus the CX-50’s 26 MPG combined, translating to a 4 MPG advantage for the Chevrolet. In terms of physical footprint, the CX-50 is larger, offering 31.4 cu ft of cargo capacity, which is 5.8 cubic feet more than the Trax’s 25.6 cu ft. Furthermore, the CX-50 includes standard All-Wheel Drive, while the Trax is Front Wheel Drive only.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2026 Chevrolet Trax
The Trax wins for commuters due to its superior fuel economy, achieving 30 MPG combined against the CX-50's 26 MPG combined.
2026 Mazda CX-50
The CX-50 is the better choice for families by providing 31.4 cu ft of cargo capacity, significantly more than the Trax's 25.6 cu ft.
2026 Mazda CX-50
Enthusiasts will prefer the CX-50 due to its higher output of 187 hp and standard All-Wheel Drive capability.
2026 Chevrolet Trax
The Trax presents superior value by offering basic crossover utility for $8,300 less than the starting price of the CX-50.
Choose the Chevrolet Trax if...
- Budget consciousness is paramount, given the $21,600 MSRP.
- Maximizing fuel economy is a priority, as the Trax achieves 32 MPG highway.
- Front-Wheel Drive operation is sufficient for your driving needs.
Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...
- All-Wheel Drive is a necessary feature for handling varied road conditions.
- Maximum hauling capacity is needed, with 31.4 cu ft available.
- Performance metrics, specifically 187 hp, are desired over efficiency.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Chevrolet Trax | Mazda CX-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 178.6" | 185.8" |
| Width | 71.8" | 75.6" |
| Height | 61.4" | 63.5" |
| Wheelbase | 106.0" | 110.8" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | — |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 2 | 3 |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | — |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Blind Spot Monitor | — | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | — | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | — | ✓ |
| Brake Assist | — | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | — | ✓ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 1.2 L | 2.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 3 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | flex-fuel (FFV) | gas |
| Horsepower | 137 hp @ 5000 rpm | 187 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 162 lb-ft @ 2500 rpm | 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 12 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cylinder Deactivation | — | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | front wheel drive | all wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 28/32 MPG | 24/30 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 30 MPG | 26 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 369.6/422.4 mi. | 381.6/477.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 13.2 gal. | 15.9 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Push Button Start | — | ✓ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | — | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | — | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | — | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | — | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 8.0 in | 10.3 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 4 | 8 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | — |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | — |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auxiliary Audio Input | ✓ | — |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | — |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | — |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | ✓ | — |
| Android Auto (Wired) | — | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 4 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | — |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Keyless Entry | — | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 39.6 in. | 39.1 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.9 in. | 41.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 55.7 in. | 55.9 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 52.1 in. | 53.6 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | — | ✓ |
Rearseats
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.1 in. | 38.6 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 38.7 in. | 39.8 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 54.3 in. | 53.6 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 45.8 in. | 52.1 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Folding Center Armrest | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Steel | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Cover Type | Full | — |
| Wheel Diameter | 17 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 225/60R17 | P225/65R17 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Size | — | 17 x 7.0 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | Independent |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 6 yr./ 100000 mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | 1 yr./ unlimited mi. | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2026 Chevrolet Trax and 2026 Mazda CX-50.
What is the primary trade-off when choosing the less expensive 2026 Chevrolet Trax?
The primary trade-off is performance and drive type. The Trax produces 50 fewer horsepower (137 hp vs. 187 hp) and is limited to Front Wheel Drive, unlike the CX-50 which features standard AWD.
How much more cargo space does the 2026 Mazda CX-50 offer?
The CX-50 offers significantly more utility with 31.4 cubic feet of cargo space compared to the Trax’s 25.6 cubic feet. This 5.8 cu ft difference is crucial for larger families or equipment hauling.
Is the higher price of the CX-50 justified by fuel savings?
No, the CX-50 costs $8,300 more upfront and is less efficient, achieving 26 MPG combined compared to the Trax's 30 MPG combined. Buyers will spend more overall by choosing the CX-50.
Do both crossovers use the same type of automatic transmission?
Yes, based on specifications, both the 2026 Chevrolet Trax and the 2026 Mazda CX-50 utilize a 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission.
Which vehicle is physically larger?
The Mazda CX-50 is the larger vehicle across all dimensions; it is 7.2 inches longer (185.8 in vs 178.6 in) and wider (75.6 in vs 71.8 in) than the Trax.
More Budget SUVs Under $30,000
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool