2025 Subaru Outback vs 2026 Mazda CX-30

Subaru Outback

$29,995 Β· Crossover

vs
Mazda CX-30

$25,975 Β· Crossover

Comparison Overview

Stuck between the sensible spaciousness of the 2025 Subaru Outback and the slightly sharper value of the 2026 Mazda CX-30? That $4,020 price gap is significant, but it dictates the entire trade-off. The Outback commands a $29,995 MSRP compared to the CX-30's $25,975 entry point, making the Subaru pricier upfront. However, the Outback delivers much more utility, boasting a substantial 32.6 cu ft of cargo capacity versus the CX-30's 20.2 cu ft. While the Outback has 182 hp and hits 28 MPG combined, the CX-30 offers slightly more power at 186 hp, though its combined efficiency is marginally lower at 27 MPG. The Outback's 191.1-inch length grants significant interior space, something the smaller 173.0-inch CX-30 can’t match, pushing the Outback ahead for overall practicality and family hauling.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

πŸš— Best for Commuters

2025 Subaru Outback

The Subaru Outback offers better fuel economy for daily drives, achieving 32 MPG on the highway compared to the CX-30's 31 MPG.

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§β€πŸ‘¦ Best for Families

2025 Subaru Outback

The Outback is the definitive family choice due to its vastly superior 32.6 cu ft of cargo capacity versus the CX-30's 20.2 cu ft.

🏎️ Best for Enthusiasts

2026 Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 edges out the Outback slightly with 186 lb-ft of torque compared to the Outback's 176 lb-ft.

πŸ’° Best Value

2026 Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 wins on initial outlay, saving buyers $4,020 with an MSRP of $25,975.

Choose the Subaru Outback if...

  • You need maximum hauling ability, as the 2025 Outback provides 32.6 cu ft of cargo space.
  • You prefer the assurance of the Outback's slightly better highway fuel economy rating of 32 MPG.
  • You value overall vehicle size, indicated by the Outback's 191.1-inch length for passenger comfort.

Choose the Mazda CX-30 if...

  • Keeping the initial purchase price low is crucial, thanks to the CX-30's $25,975 MSRP.
  • You prefer a transmission with defined gear steps, as the CX-30 uses a 6-speed automatic over the Outback's CVT.
  • You want marginally higher peak torque figures, with the CX-30 offering 186 lb-ft versus the Outback's 176 lb-ft.

Key Dimensions

Dimension Subaru Outback Mazda CX-30
Length 191.1" 173.0"
Width 73.0" 70.7"
Height 66.1" 61.4"
Wheelbase 108.1" 104.4"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Subaru Mazda
Lane Departure Warning βœ“ βœ“
Lane Keeping Assist System βœ“ βœ“
Pre-Collision Safety System βœ“ βœ“
Post-Collision Safety System βœ“ βœ“
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags βœ“ βœ“
Front Head Airbags βœ“ βœ“
Rear Head Airbags βœ“ βœ“
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation βœ“ βœ“
Electronic Stability Control βœ“ βœ“
Traction Control System βœ“ βœ“
LATCH System βœ“ βœ“
Rear Door Child Safety Locks βœ“ βœ“
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes βœ“ βœ“
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes βœ“ β€”
Brake Assist βœ“ βœ“
Tire Pressure Monitoring System βœ“ βœ“
Automatic Headlights βœ“ βœ“
Headlight Delay-Off βœ“ βœ“
LED Headlights βœ“ βœ“
Adaptive Headlights βœ“ β€”
Self-Leveling Headlights βœ“ β€”
Daytime Running Lights βœ“ βœ“
Front Fog Lights βœ“ β€”
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors βœ“ βœ“
Front Headrests 2 2
Front Multi-Adjustable Headrests βœ“ β€”
Rear Headrests 3 3
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests βœ“ βœ“
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt βœ“ βœ“
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) βœ“ β€”
Engine Immobilizer βœ“ βœ“
Blind Spot Monitor β€” βœ“
Rear Cross Traffic Alert β€” βœ“
Driver Attention Alert β€” βœ“
Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags β€” βœ“
Rear Solid Disc Brakes β€” βœ“
Front Height Adjustable Headrests β€” βœ“
Engine
Feature Subaru Mazda
Base Engine Displacement 2.5 L 2.5 L
Number of Cylinders flat 4 inline 4
Base Engine Type gas gas
Horsepower 182 hp @ 5800 rpm 186 hp @ 6000 rpm
Torque 176 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm 186 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Number of Valves 16 16
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type βœ“ βœ“
Drive Train
Feature Subaru Mazda
Transmission Type continuously variable-speed automatic 6-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type all wheel drive all wheel drive
Center Differential Type Limited Slip β€”
Hill Descent Control βœ“ β€”
Fuel
Feature Subaru Mazda
Fuel Type regular unleaded regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 26/32 MPG 24/31 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 28 MPG 27 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 481.0/592.0 mi. 304.8/393.7 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 18.5 gal. 12.7 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Subaru Mazda
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel βœ“ βœ“
Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel βœ“ β€”
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel βœ“ βœ“
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel βœ“ βœ“
Electric Power Steering βœ“ βœ“
Rear View Camera βœ“ βœ“
Adaptive Cruise Control βœ“ βœ“
Front Cupholders βœ“ βœ“
Rear Cupholders βœ“ βœ“
Front Door Pockets βœ“ βœ“
Rear Door Pockets βœ“ βœ“
Overhead Console with Storage βœ“ β€”
Front Seatback Storage βœ“ β€”
Leather Steering Wheel βœ“ β€”
Dual Zone Climate Control βœ“ β€”
Rear Ventilation Ducts βœ“ β€”
Interior Air Filtration βœ“ β€”
Dual Vanity Mirrors βœ“ βœ“
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors βœ“ βœ“
Cargo Floor Mats βœ“ β€”
Push Button Start β€” βœ“
Single Zone Climate Control β€” βœ“
In Car Entertainment
Feature Subaru Mazda
Infotainment Display 7.0 in 8.8 in
AM/FM Stereo βœ“ βœ“
Speaker System 4 8
Android Auto (Wired) βœ“ βœ“
Apple CarPlay (Wired) βœ“ βœ“
USB Port βœ“ βœ“
Auxiliary Audio Input βœ“ β€”
USB Port with External Media Control βœ“ βœ“
Satellite Radio βœ“ β€”
Satellite Radio Trial Length 4 months β€”
Power Feature
Feature Subaru Mazda
One-Touch Power Windows 2 4
Remote Keyless Entry βœ“ βœ“
Heated Mirrors βœ“ βœ“
Frontseats
Feature Subaru Mazda
Front Head Room 40.1 in. 38.1 in.
Front Leg Room 42.8 in. 41.7 in.
Front Shoulder Room 58.1 in. 55.6 in.
Front Hip Room 55.5 in. 54.6 in.
Seat Material: Cloth βœ“ βœ“
Front Seat Type: Bucket βœ“ βœ“
Driver Seat Manual Adjustments 6-way 6-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment βœ“ βœ“
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments 4-way 4-way
Driver Seat Heating Multi-level β€”
Passenger Seat Heating Multi-level β€”
Rearseats
Feature Subaru Mazda
Rear Head Room 39.1 in. 38.3 in.
Rear Leg Room 39.5 in. 36.3 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 57.4 in. 53.6 in.
Rear Hip Room 54.8 in. 53.2 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback βœ“ βœ“
Reclining Rear Seats βœ“ βœ“
Folding Center Armrest βœ“ β€”
Tires and Wheels
Feature Subaru Mazda
Wheel Finish Painted Alloy Painted Alloy
Wheel Size 17 x 7.0 in 16 x 6.5 in
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size 225/65R H 215/65R16
Spare Tire Type Temporary Temporary
Spare Tire Location Inside Mounted Inside Mounted
Suspension
Feature Subaru Mazda
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension βœ“ β€”
Front Stabilizer Bar βœ“ β€”
Rear Stabilizer Bar βœ“ β€”
Front Suspension Type β€” Independent
Stabilizer Bar β€” βœ“
Warranty
Feature Subaru Mazda
Basic Warranty 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 5 yr./ unlimited mi. 5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Subaru Outback and 2026 Mazda CX-30.

Is the difference in power between these two crossovers noticeable for city driving?

It is very subtle; the 2026 Mazda CX-30 has 186 horsepower while the 2025 Subaru Outback offers 182 horsepower. For daily stop-and-go traffic, both feel adequate, but the CX-30 has a slight edge in torque output (186 lb-ft vs. 176 lb-ft).

How much more practical is the Outback regarding luggage space?

The Subaru Outback is substantially more practical, offering 32.6 cubic feet of cargo capacity behind the rear seats. This is over 12 cubic feet more than the Mazda CX-30’s 20.2 cubic feet, making the Outback better for big shopping trips or travel gear.

Since both have All-Wheel Drive, is one better for snowy climates?

Both vehicles feature All-Wheel Drive, which is excellent for traction. However, the Subaru Outback is generally taller at 66.1 inches compared to the CX-30's 61.4 inches, which might offer slightly better ground clearance for deep snow.

How do their fuel costs compare since they both use regular unleaded?

The Outback will likely save you a little money over time, achieving 28 MPG combined, whereas the CX-30 gets 27 MPG combined. The Outback also nets slightly better highway mileage at 32 MPG versus the CX-30's 31 MPG.

What is the real-world impact of the size difference on parking?

The Mazda CX-30 is significantly shorter at 173.0 inches long compared to the Outback's 191.1 inches. This smaller footprint makes the CX-30 much easier to maneuver and squeeze into tight parking spaces.

If I buy the cheaper CX-30, am I missing out on crucial technology features?

Based purely on the provided specifications, we cannot compare infotainment or standard tech packages, as those details weren't supplied. We can only confirm the CX-30 saves you $4,020 MSRP initially.

More Budget SUVs Under $30,000

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool