2025 Nissan Kicks vs 2026 Mazda CX-50

Nissan Kicks

$21,830 ยท Crossover

vs
Mazda CX-50

$29,900 ยท Crossover

Comparison Overview

The $8,070 MSRP gap between the 2025 Nissan Kicks ($21,830) and the 2026 Mazda CX-50 ($29,900) is the most significant initial differentiator. Performance metrics clearly favor the Mazda, offering 187 hp and 185 lb-ft of torque compared to the Kicks' 141 hp and 140 lb-ft of torque. This power advantage is balanced against fuel economy, where the Kicks achieves a superior 31 MPG combined versus the CX-50's 26 MPG combined, a measurable 5 MPG difference. Furthermore, the Kicks utilizes efficient FWD with a CVT, while the CX-50 provides standard AWD paired with a 6-speed automatic transmission. While the CX-50 is slightly larger at 185.8 inches in length, the Kicks offers 30 cu ft of cargo space, slightly less than the CX-50's 31.4 cu ft capacity. The Kicks prioritizes budget and efficiency, whereas the CX-50 focuses on power and all-weather capability.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

๐Ÿš— Best for Commuters

2025 Nissan Kicks

The 2025 Nissan Kicks wins for commuting due to its higher 31 MPG combined rating and significantly lower starting price of $21,830.

๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ‘งโ€๐Ÿ‘ฆ Best for Families

2026 Mazda CX-50

The 2026 Mazda CX-50 is better suited for families due to its larger overall dimensions and standard All-Wheel Drive capability.

๐ŸŽ๏ธ Best for Enthusiasts

2026 Mazda CX-50

The Mazda CX-50 appeals to enthusiasts by producing 187 hp and 185 lb-ft of torque, vastly outperforming the Kicks' 141 hp.

๐Ÿ’ฐ Best Value

2025 Nissan Kicks

The Kicks presents superior immediate value based on its $8,070 lower entry price point while still offering competitive utility.

Choose the Nissan Kicks if...

  • Your primary concern is minimizing operational costs, evidenced by the 35 MPG highway rating.
  • You require the lowest possible acquisition price, starting at $21,830.
  • You primarily drive in dry conditions and prefer the simplicity of Front Wheel Drive and a CVT.

Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...

  • You prioritize dynamic performance, as the 187 hp engine offers substantially more power.
  • You require reliable traction from standard All-Wheel Drive capability.
  • You need slightly more capacity, benefiting from 31.4 cu ft of cargo space versus 30 cu ft.

Key Dimensions

Dimension Nissan Kicks Mazda CX-50
Length 171.9" 185.8"
Width 70.9" 75.6"
Height 64.2" 63.5"
Wheelbase 104.6" 110.8"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Nissan Mazda
Blind Spot Monitor โœ“ โœ“
Lane Departure Warning โœ“ โœ“
Rear Cross Traffic Alert โœ“ โœ“
Driver Attention Alert โœ“ โœ“
Pre-Collision Safety System โœ“ โœ“
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags โœ“ โ€”
Front Head Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Rear Head Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation โœ“ โœ“
Electronic Stability Control โœ“ โœ“
Traction Control System โœ“ โœ“
LATCH System โœ“ โœ“
Rear Door Child Safety Locks โœ“ โœ“
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes โœ“ โœ“
Rear Solid Disc Brakes โœ“ โœ“
Brake Assist โœ“ โœ“
Tire Pressure Monitoring System โœ“ โœ“
Automatic Headlights โœ“ โœ“
Headlight Delay-Off โœ“ โœ“
LED Headlights โœ“ โœ“
Daytime Running Lights โœ“ โœ“
Front Headrests 2 2
Front Height Adjustable Headrests โœ“ โœ“
Rear Headrests 3 3
Rear Fixed Headrests โœ“ โ€”
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt โœ“ โœ“
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) โœ“ โ€”
Engine Immobilizer โœ“ โœ“
Lane Keeping Assist System โ€” โœ“
Post-Collision Safety System โ€” โœ“
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors โ€” โœ“
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests โ€” โœ“
Engine
Feature Nissan Mazda
Base Engine Displacement 2.0 L 2.5 L
Number of Cylinders inline 4 inline 4
Base Engine Type gas gas
Horsepower 141 hp @ 6000 rpm 187 hp @ 6000 rpm
Torque 140 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Number of Valves 16 16
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type โ€” โœ“
Cylinder Deactivation โ€” โœ“
Drive Train
Feature Nissan Mazda
Transmission Type continuously variable-speed automatic 6-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type front wheel drive all wheel drive
Fuel
Feature Nissan Mazda
Fuel Type regular unleaded regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 28/35 MPG 24/30 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 31 MPG 26 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 333.2/416.5 mi. 381.6/477.0 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 11.9 gal. 15.9 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Nissan Mazda
Push Button Start โœ“ โœ“
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Electric Power Steering โœ“ โœ“
Rear View Camera โœ“ โœ“
Rear Parking Sensors โœ“ โ€”
Cruise Control โœ“ โ€”
Front Cupholders โœ“ โœ“
Rear Cupholders โœ“ โœ“
Front Door Pockets โœ“ โœ“
Rear Door Pockets โœ“ โœ“
Front Seatback Storage โœ“ โœ“
Single Zone Climate Control โœ“ โ€”
Interior Air Filtration โœ“ โœ“
Dual Vanity Mirrors โœ“ โœ“
Wireless Charging Pad โ€” โœ“
Adaptive Cruise Control โ€” โœ“
Overhead Console with Storage โ€” โœ“
Leather Steering Wheel โ€” โœ“
Dual Zone Climate Control โ€” โœ“
Rear Ventilation Ducts โ€” โœ“
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors โ€” โœ“
In Car Entertainment
Feature Nissan Mazda
Infotainment Display 7.0 in 10.3 in
AM/FM Stereo โœ“ โœ“
Speaker System 4 8
Android Auto (Wired) โœ“ โœ“
Apple CarPlay (Wired) โœ“ โœ“
USB Port โœ“ โœ“
Auxiliary Audio Input โœ“ โ€”
USB Port with External Media Control โ€” โœ“
Power Feature
Feature Nissan Mazda
One-Touch Power Windows 2 4
Remote Keyless Entry โœ“ โ€”
Heated Mirrors โœ“ โœ“
Keyless Entry โ€” โœ“
Frontseats
Feature Nissan Mazda
Front Head Room 39.7 in. 39.1 in.
Front Leg Room 42.7 in. 41.7 in.
Front Shoulder Room 54.7 in. 55.9 in.
Front Hip Room 52.4 in. 53.6 in.
Seat Material: Cloth โœ“ โ€”
Front Seat Type: Bucket โœ“ โœ“
Driver Seat Manual Adjustments 6-way 6-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment โœ“ โœ“
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments 4-way 4-way
Seat Material: Leatherette โ€” โœ“
Rearseats
Feature Nissan Mazda
Rear Head Room 38.5 in. 38.6 in.
Rear Leg Room 34.5 in. 39.8 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 54.7 in. 53.6 in.
Rear Hip Room 50.1 in. 52.1 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback โœ“ โœ“
Folding Center Armrest โ€” โœ“
Tires and Wheels
Feature Nissan Mazda
Wheel Material Steel โ€”
Wheel Cover Type Full โ€”
Wheel Size 16 x 6.5 in 17 x 7.0 in
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size 215/60R16 P225/65R17
Wheel Finish โ€” Painted Alloy
Spare Tire Type โ€” Temporary
Spare Tire Location โ€” Inside Mounted
Suspension
Feature Nissan Mazda
Front Suspension Type Independent Independent
Front Stabilizer Bar โœ“ โ€”
Rear Stabilizer Bar โœ“ โ€”
Stabilizer Bar โ€” โœ“
Warranty
Feature Nissan Mazda
Basic Warranty 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 5 yr./ unlimited mi. 5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance 2 yr./ 24000 mi. โ€”

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Nissan Kicks and 2026 Mazda CX-50.

What is the true cost difference considering fuel economy?

While the MSRP difference is $8,070 in favor of the Kicks, the Kicks' 5 MPG advantage (31 combined vs. 26 combined) will save money over time. However, factoring in the Kicks' use of regular unleaded vs. potential lower-grade fuel requirements for the Mazda (if applicable, though both list regular) requires further long-term analysis.

How much more interior room does the CX-50 offer?

The 2026 Mazda CX-50 is longer at 185.8 inches compared to the Kicks' 171.9 inches, resulting in marginally more cargo space at 31.4 cu ft versus 30 cu ft. The CX-50 is also significantly wider by 4.7 inches.

Is the Kicks' FWD a significant limitation compared to the CX-50's AWD?

For drivers in regions with heavy snow or frequent severe weather, the standard All-Wheel Drive on the CX-50 provides a measurable traction advantage. The Kicks is limited to Front Wheel Drive, relying on its lighter weight and 28 MPG city rating for urban performance.

Which vehicle offers better acceleration based on specifications?

The Mazda CX-50 is expected to accelerate significantly faster due to its 46 hp advantage (187 hp vs. 141 hp) and higher torque output (185 lb-ft vs. 140 lb-ft). The Kicks uses a CVT optimized for efficiency, whereas the CX-50 uses a more traditional 6-speed automatic.

Are both vehicles compatible with standard fuel?

Yes, both the 2025 Nissan Kicks and the 2026 Mazda CX-50 specify usage of regular unleaded fuel, simplifying long-term fueling costs.

How does the size difference impact maneuverability?

The Nissan Kicks is notably smaller and shorter (171.9 inches long), which generally translates to easier maneuvering and parking in tight urban environments compared to the larger CX-50 (185.8 inches long).

More Budget SUVs Under $30,000

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool