2025 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2026 Mazda CX-50

Mitsubishi Outlander

$29,995 · Crossover

vs
Mazda CX-50

$29,900 · Crossover

Comparison Overview

Choosing between the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander and the 2026 Mazda CX-50 when starting near the $30,000 mark is tricky because they prioritize different things. If your main concern is maximizing fuel stops, the Outlander has a slight edge, delivering a combined 27 MPG compared to the CX-50's 26 MPG, though both use regular unleaded. However, the biggest difference is practicality versus capability. The Outlander is taller at 68.7 inches, but the CX-50 offers substantially more usable space, boasting 31.4 cubic feet of cargo capacity versus the Outlander’s tight 10.9 cu ft (Note: This small Outlander figure may refer to a specific configuration, highlighting a key difference). Power is neck-and-neck, with the CX-50 offering a minor advantage in output (187 hp vs. 181 hp). The CX-50’s standard All-Wheel Drive (AWD) capability is a major selling point against the Outlander’s standard Front-Wheel Drive (FWD) setup, especially considering their MSRPs are nearly identical at $29,995 (Outlander) and $29,900 (CX-50).

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

🚗 Best for Commuters

2025 Mitsubishi Outlander

The Outlander is slightly more fuel-efficient on the highway, achieving 31 MPG highway versus the CX-50's 30 MPG.

👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Best for Families

2026 Mazda CX-50

The CX-50 provides significantly more storage with 31.4 cu ft of cargo space compared to the Outlander's 10.9 cu ft.

🏎️ Best for Enthusiasts

2026 Mazda CX-50

The CX-50 offers marginally more power with 187 horsepower and comes standard with All-Wheel Drive.

💰 Best Value

2026 Mazda CX-50

For $95 less, the CX-50 includes standard All-Wheel Drive and a superior cargo capacity figure.

Choose the Mitsubishi Outlander if...

  • You prioritize a slightly higher highway fuel economy rating of 31 MPG.
  • You prefer a taller vehicle stance, as the Outlander is 68.7 inches high versus the CX-50's 63.5 inches.
  • You are comfortable with a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) setup over a traditional geared automatic.

Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...

  • You need maximum cargo versatility, as the CX-50 offers 31.4 cu ft.
  • You want standard All-Wheel Drive for better traction in adverse weather conditions.
  • You appreciate a slightly more engaging drivetrain with 187 horsepower and a 6-speed shiftable automatic.

Key Dimensions

Dimension Mitsubishi Outlander Mazda CX-50
Length 185.8" 185.8"
Width 74.7" 75.6"
Height 68.7" 63.5"
Wheelbase 106.5" 110.8"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Mitsubishi Mazda
Blind Spot Monitor
Lane Departure Warning
Rear Cross Traffic Alert
Driver Attention Alert
Pre-Collision Safety System
Post-Collision Safety System
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags
Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags
Front Head Airbags
Rear Head Airbags
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation
Electronic Stability Control
Traction Control System
LATCH System
Rear Door Child Safety Locks
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes
Brake Assist
Tire Pressure Monitoring System
Automatic Headlights
LED Headlights
Daytime Running Lights
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors
Front Headrests 2 2
Front Height Adjustable Headrests
Rear Headrests 3 3
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote)
Engine Immobilizer
Lane Keeping Assist System
Rear Solid Disc Brakes
Headlight Delay-Off
Engine
Feature Mitsubishi Mazda
Base Engine Displacement 2.5 L 2.5 L
Number of Cylinders inline 4 inline 4
Base Engine Type gas gas
Horsepower 181 hp @ 6000 rpm 187 hp @ 6000 rpm
Torque 181 lb-ft @ 3600 rpm 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Number of Valves 16 16
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type
Cylinder Deactivation
Drive Train
Feature Mitsubishi Mazda
Transmission Type continuously variable-speed automatic 6-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type front wheel drive all wheel drive
Fuel
Feature Mitsubishi Mazda
Fuel Type regular unleaded regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 24/31 MPG 24/30 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 27 MPG 26 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 348.0/449.5 mi. 381.6/477.0 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 14.5 gal. 15.9 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Mitsubishi Mazda
Push Button Start
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel
Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
Electric Power Steering
Rear View Camera
Rear Parking Sensors
Cruise Control
Front Cupholders
Rear Cupholders
Front Door Pockets
Overhead Console with Storage
Front Seatback Storage
Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry
Dual Zone Climate Control
Rear Ventilation Ducts
Interior Air Filtration
Extended Cabin Heating/Cooling
Dual Vanity Mirrors
Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors
Wireless Charging Pad
Adaptive Cruise Control
Rear Door Pockets
Leather Steering Wheel
In Car Entertainment
Feature Mitsubishi Mazda
Infotainment Display 12.3 in 10.3 in
AM/FM Stereo
Speaker System 8 8
Android Auto (Wireless)
Apple CarPlay (Wireless)
USB Port
USB Port with External Media Control
Satellite Radio
Satellite Radio Trial Period 3 months
Android Auto (Wired)
Apple CarPlay (Wired)
Power Feature
Feature Mitsubishi Mazda
One-Touch Power Windows 1 4
Remote Keyless Entry
Heated Mirrors
Keyless Entry
Frontseats
Feature Mitsubishi Mazda
Front Head Room 40.6 in. 39.1 in.
Front Leg Room 41.7 in. 41.7 in.
Front Shoulder Room 57.9 in. 55.9 in.
Front Hip Room 54.0 in. 53.6 in.
Seat Material: Cloth
Front Seat Type: Bucket
Driver Seat Manual Adjustments 6-way 6-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment
Driver Seat Lumbar Support Power
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments 4-way 4-way
Seat Material: Leatherette
Rearseats
Feature Mitsubishi Mazda
Rear Head Room 39.1 in. 38.6 in.
Rear Leg Room 39.9 in. 39.8 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 55.9 in. 53.6 in.
Rear Hip Room 53.3 in. 52.1 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback
Folding Center Armrest
Manual Folding Third Row Seat
Tires and Wheels
Feature Mitsubishi Mazda
Wheel Material Alloy
Wheel Size 18 x 7.5 in 17 x 7.0 in
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size P235/60R18 P225/65R17
Wheel Finish Painted Alloy
Spare Tire Type Temporary
Spare Tire Location Inside Mounted
Suspension
Feature Mitsubishi Mazda
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension
Front Stabilizer Bar
Rear Stabilizer Bar
Front Suspension Type Independent
Stabilizer Bar
Warranty
Feature Mitsubishi Mazda
Basic Warranty 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 10 yr./ 100000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 7 yr./ 100000 mi. 5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 5 yr./ unlimited mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance 2 yr./ 30000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2026 Mazda CX-50.

Which crossover handles snowy roads better?

The 2026 Mazda CX-50 is likely the better choice because it comes standard with All-Wheel Drive (AWD). The 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander’s base configuration is Front-Wheel Drive (FWD), which generally offers less capability in slick conditions.

How do the standard engine specs compare?

They are very close; the CX-50 technically wins on power output, generating 187 hp and 185 lb-ft of torque compared to the Outlander’s 181 hp and 181 lb-ft of torque. Both use regular unleaded fuel.

Is the size difference between these crossovers significant?

Exterior dimensions are nearly identical in length (185.8 inches for both) and width, but the Outlander is considerably taller at 68.7 inches versus the CX-50’s 63.5 inches. This height difference likely impacts interior headroom and cargo configuration.

Which vehicle is better for long-distance freeway driving?

The 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander has a marginal advantage in highway fuel efficiency, rated at 31 MPG Highway compared to the CX-50’s 30 MPG Highway. This might translate to slightly fewer stops on long road trips.

How different is the cargo space, despite similar exterior footprints?

The difference is massive; the CX-50 advertises 31.4 cu ft of cargo capacity, while the Outlander lists only 10.9 cu ft in the spec sheet provided. If carrying bulky items is a priority, the CX-50 is the clear winner here.

Are there significant price differences between the two base models?

No, the pricing is extremely similar. The 2026 Mazda CX-50 is listed at $29,900, making it $95 cheaper than the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander's MSRP of $29,995.

More Budget SUVs Under $30,000

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool