2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV vs 2026 Ford Escape
Comparison Overview
The most significant numerical divergence between the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV (car1) and the 2026 Ford Escape (car2) is the $10,095 difference in starting MSRP, with the Escape priced at $30,350 versus the Outlander PHEV's $40,445. Performance metrics further separate the two crossovers: car1 delivers a substantial 248 hp, eclipsing car2's 180 hp, which is a 68 hp advantage. However, car2 maintains superior conventional fuel economy at 30 combined MPG compared to car1's 26 combined MPG. The primary differentiator for car1 is its 38 miles of all-electric range, a feature entirely absent in car2. Physically, the Outlander PHEV is longer at 185.4 inches and wider at 84.4 inches, while the Escape offers substantially more cargo utility, boasting 37.5 cu ft versus the Mitsubishi's 12.8 cu ft.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV
The Outlander PHEV wins for commuters due to its 38 miles of electric range, which significantly reduces reliance on gasoline during daily driving.
2026 Ford Escape
The Ford Escape is the superior family choice because it offers more than double the usable space with 37.5 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the Outlander's 12.8 cu ft.
2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV
Car1 appeals more to driving enthusiasts by providing 248 hp and standard all-wheel drive, significantly outperforming car2's 180 hp and FWD configuration.
2026 Ford Escape
The Ford Escape presents better entry-level value by saving the buyer $10,095 in initial purchase price while offering a 30 combined MPG rating.
Choose the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV if...
- You prioritize high power output, evidenced by its 248 hp rating.
- Your driving patterns require significant zero-emission travel using the 38-mile electric range.
- All-wheel drive capability is a necessity for your driving conditions.
Choose the Ford Escape if...
- Maximizing cargo volume is critical, as it provides 37.5 cu ft versus car1's 12.8 cu ft.
- Achieving the best non-PHEV fuel economy is key, as it achieves 30 combined MPG.
- The starting MSRP of $30,350 is a major factor in the purchasing decision.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV | Ford Escape |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 185.4" | 180.1" |
| Width | 84.4" | 74.1" |
| Height | 68.5" | 66.0" |
| Wheelbase | 106.5" | 106.7" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | — |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | — |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Washers | ✓ | — |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | — |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | — | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Brake Preparation System | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.4 L | 1.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 3 |
| Base Engine Type | plug-in hybrid | gas |
| Horsepower | 248 hp | 180 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 12 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
| Torque | — | 199 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm |
| Cylinder Deactivation | — | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 1-speed direct drive | 8-speed automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | front wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 25/27 MPG | 27/34 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 26 MPG | 30 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 370.0/399.6 mi. | 399.6/503.2 mi. |
| EPA Efficiency (City/Highway MPGe) | 67/61 MPGe | — |
| EPA Efficiency (Combined MPGe) | 64 MPGe | — |
| EPA Electric Driving Range | 38 mi. | — |
| EPA Energy Consumption (kWh/100 mi) | 52 | — |
| Charging Time (240V) | 6.5 hr. | — |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 14.8 gal. | 14.8 gal. |
| DC Fast Charging Port Type | CHAdeMO | — |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | ✓ | — |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| 3rd Row Cupholders | ✓ | — |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry | ✓ | — |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | ✓ | — |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Extended Cabin Heating/Cooling | ✓ | — |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Rear Door Pockets | — | ✓ |
| Steering Wheel Material | — | Alloy |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 8.0 in | 8.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 6 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | ✓ | — |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | ✓ | — |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | 3 months |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | — | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | — | ✓ |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 1 | 1 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | — |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Keyless Entry | — | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 40.6 in. | 40.0 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.7 in. | 42.4 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.9 in. | 57.6 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 54.0 in. | 55.2 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | — |
| Driver Seat Heating | Multi-level | — |
| Passenger Seat Heating | Multi-level | — |
| Seat Material: Premium Cloth | — | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | — | 6-way |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | — | 4-way |
Rearseats
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.1 in. | 39.3 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 38.1 in. | 40.7 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 55.9 in. | 56.0 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 53.3 in. | 53.3 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | ✓ | — |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | ✓ |
| One-Piece Folding Third Row Seat | ✓ | — |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Material | Alloy | — |
| Wheel Size | 18 x 7.0 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | P235/60R18 | 225/65R H |
| Wheel Finish | — | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Diameter | — | 17 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 10 yr./ 100000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Hybrid Component Warranty | 10 yr./ 100000 mi. | 8 yr./ 100000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 7 yr./ 100000 mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | 2 yr./ 30000 mi. | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and 2026 Ford Escape.
What is the primary operational difference between the 2025 Outlander PHEV and the 2026 Escape?
The Outlander PHEV operates as a plug-in hybrid, offering 38 miles of all-electric driving before switching to hybrid mode, achieving 26 combined MPG. The Ford Escape operates solely as a traditional hybrid or gasoline vehicle, focusing on a consistent 30 combined MPG, as it lacks an electric-only range.
How significantly does the power output affect real-world driving compared between these two models?
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV holds a considerable power advantage with 248 hp compared to the Ford Escape’s 180 hp. This 68 hp difference, combined with the Outlander’s standard AWD, suggests superior acceleration and capability for passing maneuvers.
Is the lower MSRP of the Ford Escape balanced by the Outlander's hybrid features?
The Escape is significantly cheaper upfront, costing $30,350 versus $40,445 for the Outlander PHEV, a $10,095 difference. While the Outlander saves on gas through its electric range, the Escape's better base MPG (30 vs 26 combined) lessens the long-term fuel cost gap.
Which crossover is more practical for hauling cargo and passengers?
The 2026 Ford Escape is substantially more practical for hauling, offering 37.5 cu ft of cargo space behind the rear seats. In contrast, the 2025 Outlander PHEV provides only 12.8 cu ft in the same configuration, making the Escape the clear winner for volume.
How do the transmissions and drive systems compare?
The Outlander PHEV utilizes a 1-speed direct drive system paired with standard all-wheel drive. The Escape employs a conventional 8-speed automatic transmission paired with standard front-wheel drive, which is a notable technical distinction in how power is delivered.
What are the differences in physical footprint between the two vehicles?
The Outlander PHEV is larger overall, measuring 185.4 inches in length and 84.4 inches in width. The Escape is slightly smaller and less imposing, with a length of 180.1 inches and a width of 74.1 inches, which might aid in urban maneuvering.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool