2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV vs 2026 Ford Bronco
Comparison Overview
The most significant numerical divergence between the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV (Car 1) and the 2026 Ford Bronco (Car 2) lies in fuel economy, with the Outlander achieving 26 MPG combined versus the Bronco's 19 MPG combined—a 7 MPG advantage. Power figures also strongly favor the Bronco, which produces 300 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque compared to the Outlander's 248 hp. Priced nearly identically, at $40,445 versus $40,495, the vehicles target drastically different utility needs. Car 1 offers a usable 38 miles of electric range, a feature absent in Car 2, while Car 2 provides 20.6 cu ft of cargo capacity, significantly more than Car 1's 12.8 cu ft. The Outlander PHEV uses a simpler 1-speed direct drive transmission, contrasting with the Bronco's 7-speed manual.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV
The Outlander PHEV's 38 miles of electric range and 26 combined MPG offer superior daily efficiency for routine commuting.
2026 Ford Bronco
The 2026 Ford Bronco offers superior hauling capability with 20.6 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the Outlander's 12.8 cu ft.
2026 Ford Bronco
The Bronco provides 300 hp, 325 lb-ft of torque, and a engaging 7-speed manual transmission, aligning with performance driving preferences.
2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV
For nearly the same MSRP ($40,445), the Outlander PHEV provides electric-only driving capability and better base fuel economy.
Choose the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV if...
- Your primary focus is minimizing fuel consumption, leveraging the 38 miles of electric range and 26 combined MPG.
- You prefer the simplicity and reliability of an all-wheel-drive system paired with a 1-speed direct drive transmission.
- You need a lower overall vehicle height (68.5 inches) for garage clearance or easier passenger access.
Choose the Ford Bronco if...
- Maximizing raw power and driver engagement via the 300 hp engine and 7-speed manual transmission is critical.
- You require substantial utility space, benefiting from the 20.6 cu ft of cargo capacity versus Car 1's 12.8 cu ft.
- Off-road capability and a commanding stance (71.9 inches high) are priorities over hybrid efficiency.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV | Ford Bronco |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 185.4" | 173.7" |
| Width | 84.4" | 75.9" |
| Height | 68.5" | 71.9" |
| Wheelbase | 106.5" | 100.4" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | — |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | — |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | — |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | — |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | — |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | — |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | — |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Washers | ✓ | — |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | — |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 2 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | — |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | — |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | — |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Brake Preparation System | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.4 L | 2.3 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | plug-in hybrid | gas |
| Horsepower | 248 hp | 300 hp @ 5700 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
| Torque | — | 325 lb-ft @ 3400 rpm |
Drive Train
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 1-speed direct drive | 7-speed manual |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | four wheel drive |
| 4WD System Type | — | Part Time |
| Transfer Case Gearing | — | Electronic Hi-Lo |
| Locking Hubs | — | Automatic |
| [object Object] | — | ✓ |
| [object Object] | — | ✓ |
| Hill Descent Control | — | ✓ |
Fuel
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | premium unleaded (recommended) |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 25/27 MPG | 18/21 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 26 MPG | 19 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 370.0/399.6 mi. | 304.2/354.9 mi. |
| EPA Efficiency (City/Highway MPGe) | 67/61 MPGe | — |
| EPA Efficiency (Combined MPGe) | 64 MPGe | — |
| EPA Electric Driving Range | 38 mi. | — |
| EPA Energy Consumption (kWh/100 mi) | 52 | — |
| Charging Time (240V) | 6.5 hr. | — |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 14.8 gal. | 16.9 gal. |
| DC Fast Charging Port Type | CHAdeMO | — |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | ✓ | — |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| 3rd Row Cupholders | ✓ | — |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | — |
| Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry | ✓ | — |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | ✓ | — |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Extended Cabin Heating/Cooling | ✓ | — |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Single Zone Climate Control | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 8.0 in | 12.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 7 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | ✓ | — |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | ✓ | — |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | 3 months |
| Subwoofer Count | — | 1 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | — | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 1 | 2 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 40.6 in. | 41.0 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.7 in. | 43.1 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.9 in. | 57.1 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 54.0 in. | 56.3 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | — |
| Driver Seat Heating | Multi-level | — |
| Passenger Seat Heating | Multi-level | — |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | — | 6-way |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | — | 6-way |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | — | ✓ |
Rearseats
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.1 in. | 39.8 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 38.1 in. | 35.7 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 55.9 in. | 51.8 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 53.3 in. | 43.3 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | ✓ | — |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | — |
| One-Piece Folding Third Row Seat | ✓ | — |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Material | Alloy | — |
| Wheel Size | 18 x 7.0 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | P235/60R18 | 255/70R16 |
| Wheel Finish | — | Painted Steel |
| Wheel Diameter | — | 16 in |
| Spare Tire Type | — | Full Size Matching |
| Spare Tire Location | — | Outside Rear Mounted |
Suspension
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | — |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Front Suspension Type | — | Independent |
| Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Mitsubishi | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 10 yr./ 100000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Hybrid Component Warranty | 10 yr./ 100000 mi. | — |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 7 yr./ 100000 mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | 2 yr./ 30000 mi. | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and 2026 Ford Bronco.
What is the primary operational difference between the 2025 Outlander PHEV and the 2026 Bronco?
The primary difference is power source utilization; the Outlander PHEV offers 38 miles of pure electric driving and achieves 26 combined MPG on gasoline. Conversely, the Bronco operates purely on gasoline, recommending premium fuel, and delivers 300 hp through a conventional 7-speed manual transmission.
How significant is the cargo capacity difference between these two crossovers/SUVs?
The 2026 Ford Bronco offers considerably more storage space, boasting 20.6 cubic feet of cargo capacity. The 2025 Outlander PHEV provides only 12.8 cubic feet, representing an 8.8 cubic foot deficit for hauling capacity.
Since both vehicles cost almost the same, which offers better performance metrics?
The 2026 Ford Bronco is significantly more powerful, delivering 300 horsepower and 325 lb-ft of torque, whereas the Outlander PHEV produces 248 hp. Furthermore, the Bronco offers a driver-focused 7-speed manual transmission against the Outlander's 1-speed direct drive.
Is the Outlander PHEV's lower MSRP truly indicative of better overall value?
While the Outlander PHEV has a marginally lower MSRP at $40,445, its value proposition stems from its hybrid technology, including the 38-mile electric range. The Bronco justifies its higher operational costs (19 combined MPG) with higher output and greater utility.
Do the different drive types affect on-road stability or capability?
Both vehicles feature enhanced traction systems, but the Outlander uses All-Wheel Drive (AWD) with a direct drive setup, optimizing efficiency. The Bronco uses Four-Wheel Drive (4WD) paired with a manual transmission, typically suggesting more robust off-road readiness.
Which vehicle is physically larger based on exterior dimensions?
The 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is longer at 185.4 inches, but the 2026 Ford Bronco is significantly taller, measuring 71.9 inches high compared to the Outlander's 68.5 inches.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool