2025 Mazda CX-90 vs 2026 Volvo XC60
Comparison Overview
Choosing between the 2025 Mazda CX-90 and the 2026 Volvo XC60 often boils down to balancing initial outlay versus perceived luxury. The most immediate hurdle is the staggering $11,655 difference in MSRP, with the Mazda starting at $38,045 versus the Volvo's $49,700. While the CX-90 is longer at 200.8 inches compared to the XC60's 185.4 inches, suggesting potentially more interior room, the Mazda also delivers significantly more immediate muscle, boasting 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque against the Volvo's 247 hp and 266 lb-ft. Fuel economy is nearly identical, with the Mazda achieving a combined 25 MPG running on regular unleaded, slightly edging out the Volvo's 26 MPG which recommends premium fuel. Ultimately, the comparison pits affordability and raw power (Car1) against brand prestige and a smaller footprint (Car2).
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2026 Volvo XC60
The marginally better combined MPG of 26 and smaller overall dimensions make the Volvo XC60 slightly more manageable for daily urban driving.
2025 Mazda CX-90
The significantly longer body (200.8 inches) of the Mazda CX-90 suggests a larger cabin and utility benefit for hauling passengers and cargo.
2025 Mazda CX-90
The Mazda CX-90 offers a substantial advantage in performance with 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque compared to the Volvo's output.
2025 Mazda CX-90
The Mazda provides 33 more horsepower for $11,655 less than the starting price of the Volvo XC60.
Choose the Mazda CX-90 if...
- You prioritize sheer power, as the CX-90 delivers 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque.
- Saving money is key, given the CX-90's $38,045 MSRP is much lower than the Volvo's $49,700.
- You need maximum exterior length, as the CX-90 measures 200.8 inches long.
Choose the Volvo XC60 if...
- You prefer a vehicle that recommends cheaper regular unleaded fuel (though the Volvo only recommends premium, suggesting regular might still be usable).
- You desire a slightly better highway fuel economy rating of 30 MPG.
- You prefer a smaller overall footprint, as the XC60 is significantly shorter and slightly shorter in height than the CX-90.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Mazda CX-90 | Volvo XC60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 200.8" | 185.4" |
| Width | 78.5" | - |
| Height | 68.2" | 65.2" |
| Wheelbase | 122.8" | 112.8" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | โ | โ |
| Lane Departure Warning | โ | โ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | โ | โ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | โ | โ |
| Driver Attention Alert | โ | โ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | โ | โ |
| Front Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Rear Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Third Row Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | โ | โ |
| Electronic Stability Control | โ | โ |
| Traction Control System | โ | โ |
| LATCH System | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | โ | โ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Brake Preparation System | โ | โ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | โ | โ |
| Automatic Headlights | โ | โ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | โ | โ |
| LED Headlights | โ | โ |
| Self-Leveling Headlights | โ | โ |
| Daytime Running Lights | โ | โ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | โ | โ |
| Engine Immobilizer | โ | โ |
| Brake Assist | โ | โ |
| Adaptive Headlights | โ | โ |
| Cornering Lights | โ | โ |
| Front Fog Lights | โ | โ |
| Front Fixed Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Folding Headrests | โ | โ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | โ | โ |
Engine
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 3.3 L | 2.0 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 6 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | mild hybrid | mild hybrid |
| Horsepower | 280 hp @ 5000 rpm | 247 hp |
| Torque | 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm | 266 lb-ft |
| Number of Valves | 24 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | โ | โ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 8-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| Center Differential Type | Limited Slip | โ |
| Hill Descent Control | โ | โ |
Fuel
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | premium unleaded (recommended) |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 24/28 MPG | 23/30 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 25 MPG | 26 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 444.0/518.0 mi. | 432.4/564.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 18.8 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | โ | โ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Electric Power Steering | โ | โ |
| Rear View Camera | โ | โ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | โ | โ |
| Front Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Rear Cupholders | โ | โ |
| 3rd Row Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Front Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | โ | โ |
| Front Seatback Storage | โ | โ |
| Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry | โ | โ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Three Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | โ | โ |
| Interior Air Filtration | โ | โ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Front Parking Sensors | โ | โ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | โ | โ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | โ | โ |
| Simulated Alloy Trim on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror | โ | โ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 10.3 in | 11.2 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | โ | โ |
| Speaker System | 8 | 10 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | โ | โ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | โ | โ |
| USB Port | โ | โ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | โ | โ |
| Memory Card Slot | โ | โ |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | โ | โ |
| Stereo Power | โ | 220W |
| Satellite Radio | โ | โ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | โ | 3 months |
Power Feature
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 4 |
| Keyless Entry | โ | โ |
| Heated Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Moonroof Type | โ | 1st Row Power Glass |
Frontseats
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 39.7 in. | 38.0 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.7 in. | 41.5 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 59.2 in. | 58.2 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 56.2 in. | 56.4 in. |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | โ | โ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | โ | โ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | โ | โ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | Power |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | โ |
| Driver Seat Memory Settings | โ | 2 |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | โ | 8-way |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | โ | โ |
| Passenger Seat Lumbar Support | โ | Power |
| Driver Seat Heating | โ | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | โ | Multi-level |
Rearseats
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.3 in. | 38.0 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 39.4 in. | 38.0 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 58.1 in. | 56.3 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 55.5 in. | 55.4 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | โ | โ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | โ | โ |
| Folding Center Armrest | โ | โ |
| Manual Folding Third Row Seat | โ | โ |
| Folding Rear Seat Feature | โ | โ |
| Pass-Thru Center Armrest | โ | โ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Material | Alloy | โ |
| Wheel Size | 19 x 8.5 in | 18 x 7.5 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 265/55R19 | 235/60R18 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Finish | โ | Painted Alloy |
Suspension
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | โ | โ |
| Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
Warranty
| Feature | Mazda | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 12 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 4 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | โ | 2 yr./ 20000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda CX-90 and 2026 Volvo XC60.
Is the $11,655 price difference between the Mazda CX-90 and Volvo XC60 justified?
That depends entirely on your priorities; the CX-90 starts at $38,045 while the XC60 starts at $49,700. You gain 33 more horsepower with the Mazda but forgo the Volvo's assumed premium cabin experience.
Which crossover is better for hauling passengers and cargo based on size?
The Mazda CX-90 is noticeably larger, measuring 200.8 inches long compared to the XC60โs 185.4 inches. This suggests the CX-90 likely offers superior interior volume for families.
How significant is the horsepower gap between these two AWD models?
The gap is substantial; the Mazda CX-90 outputs 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque, giving it a clear advantage over the Volvo XC60โs 247 hp and 266 lb-ft of torque.
Do these two vehicles use the same type of fuel?
No, the Mazda CX-90 runs happily on regular unleaded gasoline, achieving 25 MPG combined. In contrast, the Volvo XC60 recommends premium unleaded despite achieving a very similar 26 MPG combined.
If I drive mostly in the city, which crossover is the better choice?
The Volvo XC60 has a slight edge in city driving efficiency at 23 MPG compared to the CX-90โs 24 MPG, but the difference is marginal for daily commuting.
Which car is easier to park given their listed dimensions?
The Volvo XC60 is generally easier to maneuver and park due to its significantly shorter length (185.4 inches) compared to the lengthy 200.8-inch Mazda CX-90.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool