2025 Mazda CX-90 vs 2026 Ford Bronco Sport
Comparison Overview
The most significant numerical divergence between the 2025 Mazda CX-90 and the 2026 Ford Bronco Sport is their power output, with the CX-90 producing 280 hp compared to the Bronco Sport's 181 hp, a difference of 99 horsepower. This substantial power gap is reflected in the $6,200 MSRP difference, with the CX-90 starting at $38,045 versus the Bronco Sport's $31,845. Conversely, the smaller Bronco Sport, at 172.7 inches long, achieves better fuel economy with 27 combined MPG compared to the CX-90's 25 combined MPG. The CX-90 offers superior torque at 332 lb-ft versus 190 lb-ft. However, the smaller crossover delivers significantly more utility, boasting 32.5 cu ft of cargo capacity against the CX-90's restrictive 14.9 cu ft.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2026 Ford Bronco Sport
The 2026 Ford Bronco Sport wins for commuters due to its superior efficiency, achieving 27 combined MPG versus the CX-90's 25 MPG.
2026 Ford Bronco Sport
The Bronco Sport is the better family choice because it offers more than double the utility with 32.5 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the CX-90's 14.9 cu ft.
2025 Mazda CX-90
The Mazda CX-90 is the clear choice for performance enthusiasts, delivering 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque.
2026 Ford Bronco Sport
The Bronco Sport offers superior utility and efficiency for $6,200 less than the CX-90, establishing a better value proposition.
Choose the Mazda CX-90 if...
- You prioritize raw performance, requiring 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque.
- You prefer the greater interior volume provided by the CX-90's longer 200.8-inch frame.
- You require the high torque figure of 332 lb-ft for towing or towing capability.
Choose the Ford Bronco Sport if...
- Your primary concern is cargo space, as the Bronco Sport offers 32.5 cu ft versus the CX-90's 14.9 cu ft.
- You are looking to minimize ownership costs with a $31,845 MSRP.
- You prioritize slight fuel economy gains, achieving 27 combined MPG instead of 25 MPG.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Mazda CX-90 | Ford Bronco Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 200.8" | 172.7" |
| Width | 78.5" | 74.3" |
| Height | 68.2" | 70.2" |
| Wheelbase | 122.8" | 105.1" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third Row Head Airbags | ✓ | — |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | — |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | — |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Self-Leveling Headlights | ✓ | — |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | — |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Brake Assist | — | ✓ |
| Rear Folding Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 3.3 L | 1.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 6 | inline 3 |
| Base Engine Type | mild hybrid | gas |
| Horsepower | 280 hp @ 5000 rpm | 181 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm | 190 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 24 | 12 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 8-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| Center Differential Type | Limited Slip | — |
| Hill Descent Control | ✓ | — |
Fuel
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 24/28 MPG | 25/30 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 25 MPG | 27 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 444.0/518.0 mi. | 400.0/480.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 16.0 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| 3rd Row Cupholders | ✓ | — |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | — |
| Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry | ✓ | — |
| Leather Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Three Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Rear Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 10.3 in | 8.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 8 | 6 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | ✓ | — |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | ✓ | — |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Memory Card Slot | ✓ | — |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | — | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | — | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | — | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | — | 3 months |
Power Feature
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 1 |
| Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 39.7 in. | 41.5 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.7 in. | 42.4 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 59.2 in. | 57.3 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 56.2 in. | 55.2 in. |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | — |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | — |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
| Seat Material: Premium Cloth | — | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | — | 6-way |
Rearseats
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.3 in. | 41.7 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 39.4 in. | 36.9 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 58.1 in. | 55.6 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 55.5 in. | 53.4 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | ✓ | — |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | ✓ |
| Manual Folding Third Row Seat | ✓ | — |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Material | Alloy | — |
| Wheel Size | 19 x 8.5 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 265/55R19 | 225/65R H |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Finish | — | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Diameter | — | 17 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda CX-90 and 2026 Ford Bronco Sport.
What is the primary performance gap between the two crossovers?
The primary performance disparity lies in horsepower; the 2025 Mazda CX-90 generates 280 hp, significantly outpacing the 2026 Ford Bronco Sport's 181 hp output. This results in a 99 hp advantage for the Mazda.
How does the cargo capacity compare for hauling gear?
The 2026 Ford Bronco Sport is far more practical for cargo, offering 32.5 cubic feet of space. In contrast, the larger exterior footprint of the Mazda CX-90 (200.8 inches long) results in only 14.9 cu ft of cargo room.
Is there a significant fuel economy trade-off for the power difference?
There is a minor trade-off; the less powerful Bronco Sport yields 27 combined MPG, while the more potent CX-90 achieves 25 combined MPG. Both vehicles utilize regular unleaded fuel.
How much more expensive is the 2025 Mazda CX-90 initially?
The Mazda CX-90 has a starting MSRP of $38,045, which is $6,200 higher than the Ford Bronco Sport's $31,845 base price. This reflects the difference in power and size between the two models.
Are there transmission differences affecting the driving experience?
No, both the 2025 Mazda CX-90 and the 2026 Ford Bronco Sport are equipped with an 8-speed shiftable automatic transmission and utilize All-Wheel Drive.
Which vehicle provides a better daily commute based on size metrics?
While both are crossovers, the smaller Bronco Sport (74.3 inches wide) may be easier to navigate in dense urban areas, although the CX-90's slightly lower height of 68.2 inches might suit low-clearance garages.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool