2025 Mazda CX-90 vs 2026 Ford Bronco

Mazda CX-90

$38,045 ยท Crossover

vs
Ford Bronco

$40,495 ยท SUV

Comparison Overview

Choosing between the polished, road-focused 2025 Mazda CX-90 and the rugged, adventurous 2026 Ford Bronco presents a classic dilemma: daily refinement versus weekend capability. The CX-90 starts at a slightly lower MSRP of $38,045 and delivers superior daily running costs with a combined 25 MPG, significantly better than the Bronco's 19 MPG. While the Bronco boasts more power with 300 horsepower versus the Mazda's 280 hp, the CX-90 counters with better torque at 332 lb-ft compared to the Bronco's 325 lb-ft, both running on regular unleaded. Measuring 200.8 inches long, the CX-90 offers more interior length than the 173.7-inch Bronco, though the Bronco provides more ultimate vertical cargo space at 20.6 cu ft versus the Mazda's 14.9 cu ft, showcasing their distinctly different priorities for suburban tasks versus trail exploration.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

๐Ÿš— Best for Commuters

2025 Mazda CX-90

The Mazda CX-90 wins for commuting due to its superior 25 MPG combined fuel economy versus the Bronco's 19 MPG.

๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ‘งโ€๐Ÿ‘ฆ Best for Families

2025 Mazda CX-90

The CX-90 is likely better for daily family duties because it uses regular unleaded fuel, unlike the Bronco's premium recommendation, and offers a smoother AWD ride.

๐ŸŽ๏ธ Best for Enthusiasts

2026 Ford Bronco

The Ford Bronco appeals more to enthusiasts with its higher 300 horsepower output and the engaging experience of a 7-speed manual transmission.

๐Ÿ’ฐ Best Value

2025 Mazda CX-90

The CX-90 offers better overall value by starting $2,450 cheaper and providing significantly better fuel efficiency, leading to lower running costs.

Choose the Mazda CX-90 if...

  • You prioritize fuel efficiency, as the CX-90 achieves 25 MPG combined, beating the Bronco by 6 MPG.
  • You want a lower barrier to entry with an MSRP of $38,045.
  • You prefer the refined driving dynamics and standard All-Wheel Drive of a crossover.

Choose the Ford Bronco if...

  • You want maximum cargo space, as the Bronco offers 20.6 cubic feet compared to the CX-90's 14.9 cubic feet.
  • You seek the thrill of a 7-speed manual transmission.
  • You need the taller stance provided by the Bronco's 71.9-inch height for off-road clearance.

Key Dimensions

Dimension Mazda CX-90 Ford Bronco
Length 200.8" 173.7"
Width 78.5" 75.9"
Height 68.2" 71.9"
Wheelbase 122.8" 100.4"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Mazda Ford
Blind Spot Monitor โœ“ โ€”
Lane Departure Warning โœ“ โ€”
Lane Keeping Assist System โœ“ โ€”
Rear Cross Traffic Alert โœ“ โ€”
Driver Attention Alert โœ“ โ€”
Pre-Collision Safety System โœ“ โœ“
Post-Collision Safety System โœ“ โœ“
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Front Head Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Rear Head Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Third Row Head Airbags โœ“ โ€”
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation โœ“ โ€”
Electronic Stability Control โœ“ โœ“
Traction Control System โœ“ โœ“
LATCH System โœ“ โœ“
Rear Door Child Safety Locks โœ“ โ€”
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes โœ“ โœ“
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes โœ“ โ€”
Brake Preparation System โœ“ โœ“
Tire Pressure Monitoring System โœ“ โœ“
Automatic Headlights โœ“ โœ“
Headlight Delay-Off โœ“ โœ“
LED Headlights โœ“ โœ“
Self-Leveling Headlights โœ“ โ€”
Daytime Running Lights โœ“ โœ“
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors โœ“ โ€”
Front Headrests 2 2
Front Height Adjustable Headrests โœ“ โ€”
Rear Headrests 3 2
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests โœ“ โ€”
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt โœ“ โ€”
Engine Immobilizer โœ“ โ€”
Rear Solid Disc Brakes โ€” โœ“
Brake Assist โ€” โœ“
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) โ€” โœ“
Engine
Feature Mazda Ford
Base Engine Displacement 3.3 L 2.3 L
Number of Cylinders inline 6 inline 4
Base Engine Type mild hybrid gas
Horsepower 280 hp @ 5000 rpm 300 hp @ 5700 rpm
Torque 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm 325 lb-ft @ 3400 rpm
Number of Valves 24 16
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type โœ“ โœ“
Drive Train
Feature Mazda Ford
Transmission Type 8-speed shiftable automatic 7-speed manual
Drivetrain Type all wheel drive four wheel drive
Center Differential Type Limited Slip โ€”
Hill Descent Control โœ“ โœ“
4WD System Type โ€” Part Time
Transfer Case Gearing โ€” Electronic Hi-Lo
Locking Hubs โ€” Automatic
[object Object] โ€” โœ“
[object Object] โ€” โœ“
Fuel
Feature Mazda Ford
Fuel Type regular unleaded premium unleaded (recommended)
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 24/28 MPG 18/21 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 25 MPG 19 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 444.0/518.0 mi. 304.2/354.9 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 18.5 gal. 16.9 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Mazda Ford
Push Button Start โœ“ โœ“
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel โœ“ โ€”
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Electric Power Steering โœ“ โœ“
Rear View Camera โœ“ โœ“
Adaptive Cruise Control โœ“ โ€”
Front Cupholders โœ“ โœ“
Rear Cupholders โœ“ โœ“
3rd Row Cupholders โœ“ โ€”
Front Door Pockets โœ“ โœ“
Rear Door Pockets โœ“ โ€”
Overhead Console with Storage โœ“ โœ“
Front Seatback Storage โœ“ โ€”
Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry โœ“ โ€”
Leather Steering Wheel โœ“ โ€”
Three Zone Climate Control โœ“ โ€”
Rear Ventilation Ducts โœ“ โ€”
Interior Air Filtration โœ“ โœ“
Dual Vanity Mirrors โœ“ โœ“
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors โœ“ โ€”
Cruise Control โ€” โœ“
Single Zone Climate Control โ€” โœ“
In Car Entertainment
Feature Mazda Ford
Infotainment Display 10.3 in 12.0 in
AM/FM Stereo โœ“ โœ“
Speaker System 8 7
Android Auto (Wired) โœ“ โ€”
Apple CarPlay (Wired) โœ“ โ€”
USB Port โœ“ โœ“
USB Port with External Media Control โœ“ โœ“
Memory Card Slot โœ“ โ€”
Speed Sensitive Volume Control โœ“ โ€”
Subwoofer Count โ€” 1
Android Auto (Wireless) โ€” โœ“
Apple CarPlay (Wireless) โ€” โœ“
Satellite Radio โ€” โœ“
Satellite Radio Trial Period โ€” 3 months
Power Feature
Feature Mazda Ford
One-Touch Power Windows 4 2
Keyless Entry โœ“ โ€”
Heated Mirrors โœ“ โœ“
Remote Keyless Entry โ€” โœ“
Frontseats
Feature Mazda Ford
Front Head Room 39.7 in. 41.0 in.
Front Leg Room 41.7 in. 43.1 in.
Front Shoulder Room 59.2 in. 57.1 in.
Front Hip Room 56.2 in. 56.3 in.
Seat Material: Leatherette โœ“ โ€”
Front Seat Type: Bucket โœ“ โœ“
Driver Seat Power Adjustments 8-way โ€”
Driver Seat Height Adjustment โœ“ โœ“
Driver Seat Lumbar Support Power โ€”
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments 4-way 6-way
Seat Material: Cloth โ€” โœ“
Driver Seat Manual Adjustments โ€” 6-way
Passenger Seat Height Adjustment โ€” โœ“
Rearseats
Feature Mazda Ford
Rear Head Room 39.3 in. 39.8 in.
Rear Leg Room 39.4 in. 35.7 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 58.1 in. 51.8 in.
Rear Hip Room 55.5 in. 43.3 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback โœ“ โœ“
Reclining Rear Seats โœ“ โ€”
Folding Center Armrest โœ“ โ€”
Manual Folding Third Row Seat โœ“ โ€”
Tires and Wheels
Feature Mazda Ford
Wheel Material Alloy โ€”
Wheel Size 19 x 8.5 in โ€”
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size 265/55R19 255/70R16
Spare Tire Type Temporary Full Size Matching
Spare Tire Location Inside Mounted Outside Rear Mounted
Wheel Finish โ€” Painted Steel
Wheel Diameter โ€” 16 in
Suspension
Feature Mazda Ford
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension โœ“ โ€”
Stabilizer Bar โœ“ โœ“
Front Suspension Type โ€” Independent
Warranty
Feature Mazda Ford
Basic Warranty 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 5 yr./ unlimited mi. 5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda CX-90 and 2026 Ford Bronco.

How much more fuel efficient is the Mazda CX-90 than the Ford Bronco?

The 2025 Mazda CX-90 is noticeably more economical, delivering 25 MPG combined while the 2026 Ford Bronco manages only 19 MPG combined. This 6 MPG difference will translate to fewer trips to the pump over a year of driving.

Does the Bronco require expensive gasoline?

Yes, the 2026 Ford Bronco recommends premium unleaded fuel, whereas the Mazda CX-90 is designed to run efficiently on less expensive regular unleaded. This impacts the long-term cost of ownership significantly.

Which vehicle is physically larger?

The Mazda CX-90 is longer at 200.8 inches compared to the Bronco's 173.7 inches, suggesting more passenger room overall. However, the Bronco is significantly taller at 71.9 inches, offering better headroom or ground clearance.

What is the horsepower and torque comparison?

The Bronco has a slight edge in peak power with 300 horsepower, but the CX-90 actually leads in torque, putting down 332 lb-ft versus the Bronco's 325 lb-ft. The Mazda's torque delivery is optimized for its 8-speed automatic transmission.

Which vehicle is better for true off-roading?

The 2026 Ford Bronco, with its 4WD system and higher stance, is clearly designed for more rugged terrain than the AWD-focused Mazda CX-90.

Are the transmissions comparable?

No, they are quite different; the CX-90 uses a standard 8-speed automatic optimized for smoothness, while the Bronco offers a unique 7-speed manual transmission for drivers who prefer full control.

More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool