2025 Mazda CX-90 vs 2025 Toyota 4Runner

Mazda CX-90

$38,045 · Crossover

vs
Toyota 4Runner

$41,270 · SUV

Comparison Overview

Deciding between a stylish, road-focused crossover like the 2025 Mazda CX-90 and the rugged, traditional SUV utility of the 2025 Toyota 4Runner presents a classic dilemma: refinement versus pure capability. The CX-90 starts at a compelling $38,045, significantly undercutting the 4Runner's $41,270 MSRP by $3,225, making the Mazda immediately attractive on budget. However, the CX-90 trades utility for efficiency, achieving a combined 25 MPG compared to the 4Runner's 22 MPG, and boasts higher standard horsepower at 280 hp versus the Toyota's 278 hp. While the 4Runner offers a massive 48.4 cu ft of cargo space, the CX-90 is more efficient in daily driving. The differences in height—68.2 inches for the Mazda versus 72.6 inches for the Toyota—also highlight their opposing design philosophies for the modern family hauler.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

🚗 Best for Commuters

2025 Mazda CX-90

The CX-90 wins for commuters due to its superior combined fuel economy of 25 MPG.

👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Best for Families

2025 Toyota 4Runner

The 4Runner provides substantially more utility for families, offering 48.4 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the CX-90's 14.9 cu ft.

🏎️ Best for Enthusiasts

2025 Mazda CX-90

The Mazda appeals more to driving enthusiasts with its slightly higher 280 hp output and 332 lb-ft of torque.

💰 Best Value

2025 Mazda CX-90

The CX-90 offers a better immediate value proposition by being $3,225 cheaper while providing higher fuel economy.

Choose the Mazda CX-90 if...

  • You prioritize running costs and efficiency, as the CX-90 achieves 25 combined MPG.
  • Your budget is tight, as the Mazda undercuts the Toyota's MSRP by $3,225.
  • You prefer smoother on-road manners derived from its crossover platform and 280 hp engine.

Choose the Toyota 4Runner if...

  • Maximum hauling capability is essential, given the 4Runner's dominant 48.4 cu ft cargo volume.
  • You need greater ground clearance implied by its 72.6-inch height.
  • You value traditional SUV ruggedness over the CX-90's crossover refinement.

Key Dimensions

Dimension Mazda CX-90 Toyota 4Runner
Length 200.8" 194.9"
Width 78.5" 78.0"
Height 68.2" 72.6"
Wheelbase 122.8" 112.2"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Mazda Toyota
Blind Spot Monitor
Lane Departure Warning
Lane Keeping Assist System
Rear Cross Traffic Alert
Driver Attention Alert
Pre-Collision Safety System
Post-Collision Safety System
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags
Front Head Airbags
Rear Head Airbags
Third Row Head Airbags
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation
Electronic Stability Control
Traction Control System
LATCH System
Rear Door Child Safety Locks
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes
Brake Preparation System
Tire Pressure Monitoring System
Automatic Headlights
Headlight Delay-Off
LED Headlights
Self-Leveling Headlights
Daytime Running Lights
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors
Front Headrests 2 2
Front Height Adjustable Headrests
Rear Headrests 3 3
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt
Engine Immobilizer
Front Cross Traffic Alert
Brake Assist
Front Fog Lights
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote)
Engine
Feature Mazda Toyota
Base Engine Displacement 3.3 L 2.4 L
Number of Cylinders inline 6 inline 4
Base Engine Type mild hybrid gas
Horsepower 280 hp @ 5000 rpm 278 hp @ 6000 rpm
Torque 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm 317 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm
Number of Valves 24 16
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type
Drive Train
Feature Mazda Toyota
Transmission Type 8-speed shiftable automatic 8-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type all wheel drive rear wheel drive
Center Differential Type Limited Slip
Hill Descent Control
Fuel
Feature Mazda Toyota
Fuel Type regular unleaded regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 24/28 MPG 20/26 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 25 MPG 22 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 444.0/518.0 mi. 380.0/494.0 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 18.5 gal. 19.0 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Mazda Toyota
Push Button Start
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel
Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
Electric Power Steering
Rear View Camera
Adaptive Cruise Control
Front Cupholders
Rear Cupholders
3rd Row Cupholders
Front Door Pockets
Rear Door Pockets
Overhead Console with Storage
Front Seatback Storage
Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry
Leather Steering Wheel
Three Zone Climate Control
Rear Ventilation Ducts
Interior Air Filtration
Dual Vanity Mirrors
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors
Simulated Alloy Trim on Steering Wheel
Single Zone Climate Control
In Car Entertainment
Feature Mazda Toyota
Infotainment Display 10.3 in 8.0 in
AM/FM Stereo
Speaker System 8 8
Android Auto (Wired)
Apple CarPlay (Wired)
USB Port
USB Port with External Media Control
Memory Card Slot
Speed Sensitive Volume Control
Android Auto (Wireless)
Apple CarPlay (Wireless)
Satellite Radio
Satellite Radio Trial Period 3 months
Power Feature
Feature Mazda Toyota
One-Touch Power Windows 4 4
Keyless Entry
Heated Mirrors
Frontseats
Feature Mazda Toyota
Front Head Room 39.7 in. 39.7 in.
Front Leg Room 41.7 in. 41.8 in.
Front Shoulder Room 59.2 in. 58.0 in.
Front Hip Room 56.2 in. 55.2 in.
Seat Material: Leatherette
Front Seat Type: Bucket
Driver Seat Power Adjustments 8-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment
Driver Seat Lumbar Support Power Power
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments 4-way 6-way
Seat Material: Cloth
Driver Seat Manual Adjustments 6-way
Passenger Seat Height Adjustment
Rearseats
Feature Mazda Toyota
Rear Head Room 39.3 in. 37.8 in.
Rear Leg Room 39.4 in. 34.8 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 58.1 in. 57.8 in.
Rear Hip Room 55.5 in. 56.1 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback
Reclining Rear Seats
Folding Center Armrest
Manual Folding Third Row Seat
Tires and Wheels
Feature Mazda Toyota
Wheel Material Alloy
Wheel Size 19 x 8.5 in
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size 265/55R19 P245/70R17
Spare Tire Type Temporary
Spare Tire Location Inside Mounted
Wheel Finish Painted Alloy
Wheel Diameter 17 in
Suspension
Feature Mazda Toyota
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension
Stabilizer Bar
Front Stabilizer Bar
Rear Stabilizer Bar
Warranty
Feature Mazda Toyota
Basic Warranty 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 5 yr./ unlimited mi. 5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 2 yr./ unlimited mi.
Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance 2 yr./ 25000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda CX-90 and 2025 Toyota 4Runner.

How significant is the difference in size between the CX-90 and the 4Runner?

The CX-90 is slightly longer at 200.8 inches versus the 4Runner’s 194.9 inches, but the 4Runner is noticeably taller at 72.6 inches compared to the Mazda's 68.2 inches. This height difference reflects the 4Runner's traditional body-on-frame design.

If I do a lot of highway driving, which vehicle makes more financial sense?

The 2025 Mazda CX-90 is the clear winner for highway efficiency, boasting a 28 MPG highway rating. The Toyota 4Runner achieves only 26 MPG highway, meaning the Mazda requires fewer fuel stops over long distances.

Does the horsepower difference affect everyday driving between these two vehicles?

The CX-90 has a slight edge in power, producing 280 hp to the 4Runner's 278 hp, and slightly more torque at 332 lb-ft versus 317 lb-ft. While both are capable, the CX-90 should feel marginally quicker in merging scenarios.

Is the $3,225 price difference worth sacrificing the 4Runner's cargo space?

That depends entirely on your needs; the 4Runner offers over three times the cargo capacity (48.4 cu ft vs. 14.9 cu ft). If you frequently carry large gear, the price difference is a small premium for that massive utility gain.

Do both vehicles use the same type of fuel?

Yes, fortunately, both the 2025 Mazda CX-90 and the 2025 Toyota 4Runner are specified to run on regular unleaded gasoline, which helps keep the running costs manageable for both models.

Which vehicle is fundamentally more performance-oriented?

While the Mazda has superior horsepower figures, the 4Runner's base Rear-Wheel Drive (RWD) configuration paired with its taller stance hints at a more dedicated off-road or towing orientation, despite the Mazda's AWD standard feature.

More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool