2025 Mazda CX-90 vs 2025 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class
Comparison Overview
Choosing between the practical luxury of the 2025 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class and the powerful value of the 2025 Mazda CX-90 presents a classic automotive dilemma. Buyers must weigh upfront cost against prestige and efficiency. The Mazda CX-90 starts impressively low at $38,045, significantly undercutting the Mercedes' $49,250 MSRP by over $11,000. Despite the lower price, the CX-90 boasts higher performance metrics, delivering 280 horsepower and 332 lb-ft of torque compared to the GLC-Class's 255 hp and 295 lb-ft. However, the smaller Mercedes offers slightly better fuel economy at 27 MPG combined, while the CX-90 achieves 25 MPG combined, though both use 24 MPG in the city. The CX-90 is substantially larger at 200.8 inches long, potentially sacrificing some maneuverability for its impressive power output.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class
The Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class is the slightly more efficient choice for daily driving, achieving 32 MPG on the highway versus the CX-90's 28 MPG highway.
2025 Mazda CX-90
The Mazda CX-90 is the superior choice for families needing space, offering a much larger body at 200.8 inches in length and significantly lower starting cost.
2025 Mazda CX-90
The CX-90 is the clear winner for performance seekers, producing 280 horsepower and 332 lb-ft of torque, substantially more than the GLC-Class.
2025 Mazda CX-90
With an MSRP of $38,045 versus $49,250, the CX-90 delivers superior horsepower for a far lower initial investment.
Choose the Mazda CX-90 if...
- You prioritize sheer power, as the 2025 Mazda CX-90 delivers 280 hp compared to 255 hp in the Mercedes.
- Sticking to a budget is paramount; the CX-90 saves you $11,205 in starting MSRP.
- You need maximum real estate, given the CX-90's larger 200.8-inch length and standard AWD setup.
Choose the Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class if...
- You prefer to run on less expensive fuel, as the GLC-Class uses regular unleaded while the Mercedes requires premium.
- You value slightly better overall efficiency, posting a 27 MPG combined rating versus the CX-90's 25 MPG.
- You need more usable cargo space, as the GLC-Class provides 21.9 cubic feet versus the CX-90's 14.9 cubic feet.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Mazda CX-90 | Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 200.8" | 185.7" |
| Width | 78.5" | 74.4" |
| Height | 68.2" | 64.6" |
| Wheelbase | 122.8" | 113.7" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | โ | โ |
| Lane Departure Warning | โ | โ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | โ | โ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | โ | โ |
| Driver Attention Alert | โ | โ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | โ | โ |
| Front Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Rear Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Third Row Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | โ | โ |
| Electronic Stability Control | โ | โ |
| Traction Control System | โ | โ |
| LATCH System | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | โ | โ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Brake Preparation System | โ | โ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | โ | โ |
| Automatic Headlights | โ | โ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | โ | โ |
| LED Headlights | โ | โ |
| Self-Leveling Headlights | โ | โ |
| Daytime Running Lights | โ | โ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | โ | โ |
| Engine Immobilizer | โ | โ |
| Brake Drying | โ | โ |
| Brake Assist | โ | โ |
| Adaptive Headlights | โ | โ |
| Front Power Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | โ | โ |
Engine
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 3.3 L | 2.0 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 6 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | mild hybrid | mild hybrid |
| Horsepower | 280 hp @ 5000 rpm | 255 hp @ 5800 rpm |
| Torque | 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm | 295 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 24 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | โ | โ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 8-speed shiftable automatic | 9-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
| Center Differential Type | Limited Slip | โ |
| Hill Descent Control | โ | โ |
Fuel
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | premium unleaded (required) |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 24/28 MPG | 24/32 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 25 MPG | 27 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 444.0/518.0 mi. | 417.6/556.8 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 17.4 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | โ | โ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Electric Power Steering | โ | โ |
| Rear View Camera | โ | โ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | โ | โ |
| Front Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Rear Cupholders | โ | โ |
| 3rd Row Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Front Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | โ | โ |
| Front Seatback Storage | โ | โ |
| Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry | โ | โ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Three Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | โ | โ |
| Interior Air Filtration | โ | โ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Power Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Front Parking Sensors | โ | โ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | โ | โ |
| Automatic Parking Assist | โ | โ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | โ | โ |
| Cruise Control | โ | โ |
| Universal Remote Transmitter | โ | โ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror | โ | โ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 10.3 in | 11.9 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | โ | โ |
| Speaker System | 8 | 5 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | โ | โ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | โ | โ |
| USB Port | โ | โ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | โ | โ |
| Memory Card Slot | โ | โ |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | โ | โ |
| Subwoofer Count | โ | 1 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | โ | โ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | โ | โ |
| Satellite Radio | โ | โ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | โ | 6 months |
Power Feature
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 4 |
| Keyless Entry | โ | โ |
| Heated Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Moonroof Type | โ | 1st Row Power Glass |
Frontseats
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 39.7 in. | 41.3 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.7 in. | 40.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 59.2 in. | 57.3 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 56.2 in. | โ |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | โ | โ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | โ | โ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | 10-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | โ | โ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | Power |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | โ |
| Driver Seat Thigh Extension | โ | โ |
| Driver Seat Memory Settings | โ | 3 |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | โ | 10-way |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | โ | โ |
| Passenger Seat Lumbar Support | โ | Power |
| Passenger Seat Thigh Extension | โ | โ |
| Passenger Seat Memory Settings | โ | 3 |
| Driver Seat Heating | โ | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | โ | Multi-level |
Rearseats
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.3 in. | 39.7 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 39.4 in. | 37.4 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 58.1 in. | 56.6 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 55.5 in. | โ |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | โ | โ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | โ | โ |
| Folding Center Armrest | โ | โ |
| Manual Folding Third Row Seat | โ | โ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Material | Alloy | Alloy |
| Wheel Size | 19 x 8.5 in | 18 x 8.0 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 265/55R19 | 235/60R18 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
Suspension
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | โ | โ |
| Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
Warranty
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Hybrid Component Warranty | โ | 6 yr./ 62000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda CX-90 and 2025 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class.
Does the price difference between these two crossovers impact fuel costs significantly?
Yes, the initial $11,205 price gap is notable, but buyers should also consider fuel. The CX-90 uses regular unleaded, while the GLC-Class requires premium fuel, which adds to its long-term running costs.
Which vehicle offers better performance for highway merging or passing?
The 2025 Mazda CX-90 is significantly stronger, offering 280 horsepower and 332 lb-ft of torque compared to the GLC-Class's 255 hp and 295 lb-ft.
I often haul gear; how do the cargo capacities compare?
The smaller Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class is surprisingly more utilitarian inside, offering 21.9 cu ft of cargo space, whereas the larger CX-90 only provides 14.9 cu ft.
Are the drivetrains very different between the two cars?
They utilize different base setups; the CX-90 comes standard with All-Wheel Drive (AWD) mated to an 8-speed automatic, while the GLC-Class is listed with Rear Wheel Drive (RWD) and a 9-speed automatic.
Which crossover is better for city driving based on specs?
While both achieve 24 MPG in the city, the shorter 185.7-inch length of the GLC-Class might make it slightly easier to maneuver and park in tight urban areas compared to the 200.8-inch CX-90.
How does the required fuel type affect the ownership experience?
The Mazda CX-90 allows you to use regular unleaded gasoline, which is generally less expensive per gallon than the premium fuel mandated by the 2025 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool