2025 Mazda CX-70 vs 2026 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Comparison Overview
The 2025 Mazda CX-70 roars onto the scene with an athletic punch, boasting a robust 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque, promising engaging performance straight out of its 200.8-inch frame. Contrast this with the sleek, urban sophistication of the 2026 Range Rover Evoque, which, despite having 246 hp, captivates with its premium badge and tauter 172.1-inch dimensions. The Mazda appeals instantly with its superior power and better fuel economy, achieving 25 combined MPG on regular unleaded. However, the Evoque commands a premium asking price of $49,900 versus the CX-70's $40,445 entry, a staggering $9,455 delta. Furthermore, the CX-70 offers nearly double the utility with 39.6 cu ft of cargo space compared to the Evoque's tight 21.4 cu ft, cementing the Mazda as the more practical powerhouse.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Mazda CX-70
The Mazda CX-70 wins for commuters due to its superior 25 combined MPG efficiency compared to the Evoque's 22 MPG.
2025 Mazda CX-70
With 39.6 cu ft of cargo capacity versus only 21.4 cu ft, the CX-70 offers substantially more room for family gear.
2025 Mazda CX-70
The CX-70 offers significantly more muscle, delivering 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque, beating the Evoque's output.
2025 Mazda CX-70
The CX-70 provides considerably more power and cargo volume for a price tag that is $9,455 less than the Evoque.
Choose the Mazda CX-70 if...
- You prioritize raw performance, benefiting from the 280 hp turbocharged engine.
- You need maximum utility, as its 39.6 cu ft cargo capacity dwarfs the competitor.
- You want to save money on fuel, leveraging the 25 combined MPG using regular unleaded.
Choose the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque if...
- Brand prestige and compact luxury styling are your main focus, despite the $49,900 MSRP.
- You prefer a slightly quicker shifting experience with the 9-speed automatic transmission.
- Your needs align with the smaller footprint (172.1 inches long) for navigating tight city streets.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Mazda CX-70 | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 200.8" | 172.1" |
| Width | - | - |
| Height | 68.2" | 64.9" |
| Wheelbase | 122.8" | 105.6" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Mazda | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | — |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | — |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Self-Leveling Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | — |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Brake Preparation System | — | ✓ |
| Brake Assist | — | ✓ |
| Front Fog Lights | — | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Mazda | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 3.3 L | 2.0 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 6 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | mild hybrid | gas |
| Horsepower | 280 hp @ 5000 rpm | 246 hp @ 5500 rpm |
| Torque | 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm | 269 lb-ft @ 1300 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 24 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Mazda | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 8-speed shiftable automatic | 9-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| Center Differential Type | Limited Slip | — |
| Hill Descent Control | ✓ | ✓ |
Fuel
| Feature | Mazda | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | premium unleaded (recommended) |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 24/28 MPG | 20/27 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 25 MPG | 22 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 444.0/518.0 mi. | 354.0/477.9 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 17.7 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Mazda | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Parking Sensors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Three Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Power Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Universal Remote Transmitter | — | ✓ |
| Heated Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | — | ✓ |
| Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Mazda | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 12.3 in | 11.4 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 8 | 12 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | — |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Meridian Speakers | — | ✓ |
| Stereo Power | — | 400W |
| Subwoofer Count | — | 1 |
| Satellite Radio | — | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | — | 3 months |
Power Feature
| Feature | Mazda | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 4 |
| Moonroof Type | 1st Row Power Glass | 1st Row Power Glass |
| Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Mazda | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 39.7 in. | 37.4 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.7 in. | 40.0 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 59.2 in. | 56.6 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 56.2 in. | — |
| Seat Material: Leather | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | Power |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | 4-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Heating | Multi-level | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | Multi-level | Multi-level |
| Driver Seat Memory Settings | — | 3 |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | — | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Lumbar Support | — | Power |
Rearseats
| Feature | Mazda | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.3 in. | 38.1 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 39.4 in. | 34.0 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 58.1 in. | 55.4 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 55.5 in. | — |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | ✓ | — |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Mazda | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Material | Alloy | Alloy |
| Wheel Size | 19 x 8.5 in | 18 x 8.0 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 265/55R19 | R18 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
Suspension
| Feature | Mazda | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Mazda | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 6 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda CX-70 and 2026 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
What is the main performance gap between the 2025 Mazda CX-70 and the 2026 Range Rover Evoque?
The Mazda CX-70 holds a distinct performance advantage with 280 horsepower and 332 lb-ft of torque, whereas the Evoque is rated at 246 hp and 269 lb-ft of torque. This 34 hp difference means the CX-70 offers a much more spirited acceleration feel.
How much more expensive is the Range Rover Evoque compared to the Mazda CX-70?
The 2026 Range Rover Evoque carries a higher MSRP of $49,900, creating a significant price gap of $9,455 when compared to the CX-70's starting price of $40,445. This difference often dictates which vehicle offers better overall value.
Which crossover is better for hauling gear: the CX-70 or the Evoque?
The 2025 Mazda CX-70 is vastly superior for cargo hauling, offering 39.6 cubic feet of space. The 2026 Range Rover Evoque is significantly more constrained, providing only 21.4 cubic feet.
Do these crossovers use the same type of gasoline?
No, the Mazda CX-70 can run happily on less expensive regular unleaded fuel while achieving 25 combined MPG. The Range Rover Evoque specifically recommends premium unleaded fuel for its engine operation.
How does the driving experience differ regarding transmission type?
While both utilize shiftable automatics, the Evoque employs a 9-speed unit, suggesting potentially smoother, more gradual gear changes, compared to the CX-70’s 8-speed automatic.
If I mostly drive in the city, which car provides better fuel economy?
For city driving, the Mazda CX-70 is slightly more economical, reporting 24 MPG in the city versus the Evoque’s 20 MPG in the city.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool