2025 Mazda CX-70 vs 2026 Ford Bronco Sport
Comparison Overview
The 2025 Mazda CX-70 leaps onto the scene with a potent 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque, promising an engaging drive thanks to its powerful standard engine and substantial 200.8-inch length, suggesting premium presence. In contrast, the rugged 2026 Ford Bronco Sport captivates with its go-anywhere stance, despite offering a modest 181 hp and 190 lb-ft of torque, appealing to a more adventure-focused subset. The CX-70 demands a higher entry point at $40,445 compared to the Bronco Sport's appealing $31,845—a significant $8,600 gap. While the Mazda sacrifices a bit of fuel economy, netting 25 combined MPG, the Bronco Sport edges it out slightly at 27 combined MPG. This comparison boils down to premium refinement and raw power versus accessible ruggedness and value.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2026 Ford Bronco Sport
The Bronco Sport wins for commuting due to its superior combined MPG rating of 27 versus the CX-70's 25 MPG.
2025 Mazda CX-70
The longer CX-70 provides more passenger and storage room, boasting 39.6 cubic feet of cargo capacity compared to the Bronco Sport's 32.5 cubic feet.
2025 Mazda CX-70
The CX-70 is the clear winner here, delivering a thrilling 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque advantage over the Bronco Sport's 181 hp.
2026 Ford Bronco Sport
The Bronco Sport offers significantly better value with an MSRP of $31,845, undercutting the CX-70 by $8,600.
Choose the Mazda CX-70 if...
- You demand high performance and rapid acceleration, as the 280 hp engine is substantially stronger.
- You require maximum hauling capability, indicated by its 39.6 cu ft of available cargo space.
- You prioritize vehicle length and presence, evidenced by the CX-70's 200.8-inch exterior measurement.
Choose the Ford Bronco Sport if...
- Budget is a primary concern, saving $8,600 with the $31,845 starting price.
- You frequently travel and want slightly better fuel economy with 27 combined MPG.
- You prefer a taller, more rugged stance, reflected in its 70.2-inch height compared to the CX-70's 68.2 inches.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Mazda CX-70 | Ford Bronco Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 200.8" | 172.7" |
| Width | - | 74.3" |
| Height | 68.2" | 70.2" |
| Wheelbase | 122.8" | 105.1" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | — |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | — |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Self-Leveling Headlights | ✓ | — |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | — |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Brake Preparation System | — | ✓ |
| Brake Assist | — | ✓ |
| Rear Folding Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 3.3 L | 1.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 6 | inline 3 |
| Base Engine Type | mild hybrid | gas |
| Horsepower | 280 hp @ 5000 rpm | 181 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm | 190 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 24 | 12 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 8-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| Center Differential Type | Limited Slip | — |
| Hill Descent Control | ✓ | — |
Fuel
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 24/28 MPG | 25/30 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 25 MPG | 27 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 444.0/518.0 mi. | 400.0/480.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 16.0 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Parking Sensors | ✓ | — |
| Rear Parking Sensors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | ✓ | — |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | — |
| Leather Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Three Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Single Zone Climate Control | — | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 12.3 in | 8.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 8 | 6 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | — | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | — | 3 months |
Power Feature
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 1 |
| Moonroof Type | 1st Row Power Glass | — |
| Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 39.7 in. | 41.5 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.7 in. | 42.4 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 59.2 in. | 57.3 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 56.2 in. | 55.2 in. |
| Seat Material: Leather | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | — |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | — |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | 4-way | — |
| Driver Seat Heating | Multi-level | — |
| Passenger Seat Heating | Multi-level | — |
| Seat Material: Premium Cloth | — | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | — | 6-way |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | — | 4-way |
Rearseats
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.3 in. | 41.7 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 39.4 in. | 36.9 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 58.1 in. | 55.6 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 55.5 in. | 53.4 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | ✓ | — |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Material | Alloy | — |
| Wheel Size | 19 x 8.5 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 265/55R19 | 225/65R H |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Finish | — | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Diameter | — | 17 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Mazda | Ford |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda CX-70 and 2026 Ford Bronco Sport.
What is the practical difference in power between the two crossovers?
The Mazda CX-70 boasts a significant 280 horsepower and 332 lb-ft of torque, providing substantially quicker acceleration compared to the Ford Bronco Sport’s 181 hp and 190 lb-ft of torque.
Is the Mazda CX-70 too large for tight city parking compared to the Bronco Sport?
Yes, the CX-70 is noticeably longer at 200.8 inches, while the Bronco Sport is much more compact at 172.7 inches, making the Ford easier to maneuver and park in congested urban areas.
Which vehicle uses cheaper fuel?
Both vehicles use regular unleaded fuel, meaning neither requires premium gasoline for operation, which helps keep running costs predictable for both models.
How much more cargo space does the CX-70 offer than the Bronco Sport?
The Mazda CX-70 has 39.6 cubic feet of cargo capacity, which is 7.1 cubic feet more than the Bronco Sport’s 32.5 cubic feet, making the Mazda better for large hauls.
Considering the MSRP difference, is the performance gain in the CX-70 worth the extra cost?
The $8,600 price premium for the CX-70 grants a massive 99 hp increase; whether this boost in performance justifies the cost depends entirely on the driver's performance expectations versus the Bronco Sport's excellent value proposition.
Do both crossovers come standard with All-Wheel Drive?
Yes, both the 2025 Mazda CX-70 and the 2026 Ford Bronco Sport are equipped with All-Wheel Drive (AWD) as standard equipment for enhanced traction in varied conditions.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool