2025 Mazda CX-70 vs 2025 Toyota Highlander

Mazda CX-70

$40,445 ยท Crossover

vs
Toyota Highlander

$40,320 ยท Crossover

Comparison Overview

Trying to choose between the newly minted 2025 Mazda CX-70 and the established 2025 Toyota Highlander often comes down to size versus maneuverability. While the Highlander starts slightly cheaper at $40,320 versus the CX-70's $40,445, the Mazda counters with superior power, boasting 280 horsepower and 332 lb-ft of torque compared to the Toyota's 265 hp and 310 lb-ft. Both vehicles share an identical 25 MPG combined rating, though the Highlander pulls ahead slightly on the highway (29 MPG vs. 28 MPG). However, the CX-70 is significantly longer, measuring 200.8 inches to the Highlander's 194.9 inches, suggesting a much larger interior footprint, which is reflected in its substantial 39.6 cu ft of cargo space versus the Highlander's 16 cu ft in the base configuration. For those prioritizing power and space in an AWD package, the CX-70 presents a compelling argument against the proven efficiency and smaller footprint of the Highlander.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

๐Ÿš— Best for Commuters

2025 Toyota Highlander

The Highlander wins for commuters due to its slightly better highway fuel economy of 29 MPG and smaller exterior dimensions.

๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ‘งโ€๐Ÿ‘ฆ Best for Families

2025 Mazda CX-70

The CX-70 offers significantly more usable family space with a massive 39.6 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the Highlander's 16 cu ft.

๐ŸŽ๏ธ Best for Enthusiasts

2025 Mazda CX-70

The CX-70 delivers better performance credentials with 280 horsepower and standard All-Wheel Drive.

๐Ÿ’ฐ Best Value

2025 Toyota Highlander

The Highlander provides nearly identical combined MPG and slightly better highway MPG while costing $125 less upfront.

Choose the Mazda CX-70 if...

  • You prioritize raw engine power, needing the 280 horsepower and 332 lb-ft of torque available.
  • You need maximum hauling capability, utilizing the impressive 39.6 cu ft of standard cargo space.
  • You require standard All-Wheel Drive capability right out of the box.

Choose the Toyota Highlander if...

  • You want the absolute lowest starting price, ticking the box at $40,320.
  • You need better pure highway efficiency, achieving 29 MPG compared to the CX-70's 28 MPG.
  • You prefer a slightly smaller vehicle footprint, as the Highlander is 5.9 inches shorter in length.

Key Dimensions

Dimension Mazda CX-70 Toyota Highlander
Length 200.8" 194.9"
Width - 76.0"
Height 68.2" 68.1"
Wheelbase 122.8" 112.2"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Mazda Toyota
Blind Spot Monitor โœ“ โœ“
Lane Departure Warning โœ“ โœ“
Lane Keeping Assist System โœ“ โœ“
Rear Cross Traffic Alert โœ“ โœ“
Driver Attention Alert โœ“ โ€”
Pre-Collision Safety System โœ“ โœ“
Post-Collision Safety System โœ“ โœ“
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Front Head Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Rear Head Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation โœ“ โœ“
Electronic Stability Control โœ“ โœ“
Traction Control System โœ“ โœ“
LATCH System โœ“ โœ“
Rear Door Child Safety Locks โœ“ โœ“
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes โœ“ โœ“
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes โœ“ โ€”
Tire Pressure Monitoring System โœ“ โœ“
Automatic Headlights โœ“ โœ“
Headlight Delay-Off โœ“ โœ“
LED Headlights โœ“ โœ“
Self-Leveling Headlights โœ“ โ€”
Daytime Running Lights โœ“ โœ“
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors โœ“ โœ“
Front Headrests 2 2
Front Height Adjustable Headrests โœ“ โœ“
Rear Headrests 3 3
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests โœ“ โœ“
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt โœ“ โœ“
Engine Immobilizer โœ“ โœ“
Third Row Head Airbags โ€” โœ“
Rear Solid Disc Brakes โ€” โœ“
Brake Assist โ€” โœ“
Front Fog Lights โ€” โœ“
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) โ€” โœ“
Engine
Feature Mazda Toyota
Base Engine Displacement 3.3 L 2.4 L
Number of Cylinders inline 6 inline 4
Base Engine Type mild hybrid gas
Horsepower 280 hp @ 5000 rpm 265 hp @ 6000 rpm
Torque 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm 310 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm
Number of Valves 24 16
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type โœ“ โœ“
Drive Train
Feature Mazda Toyota
Transmission Type 8-speed shiftable automatic 8-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type all wheel drive front wheel drive
Center Differential Type Limited Slip โ€”
Hill Descent Control โœ“ โ€”
Fuel
Feature Mazda Toyota
Fuel Type regular unleaded regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 24/28 MPG 22/29 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 25 MPG 25 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 444.0/518.0 mi. 393.8/519.1 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 18.5 gal. 17.9 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Mazda Toyota
Push Button Start โœ“ โœ“
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel โœ“ โ€”
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Electric Power Steering โœ“ โœ“
Rear View Camera โœ“ โœ“
Front Parking Sensors โœ“ โ€”
Rear Parking Sensors โœ“ โ€”
Wireless Charging Pad โœ“ โ€”
Adaptive Cruise Control โœ“ โœ“
Front Cupholders โœ“ โœ“
Rear Cupholders โœ“ โœ“
Front Door Pockets โœ“ โœ“
Rear Door Pockets โœ“ โœ“
Overhead Console with Storage โœ“ โœ“
Front Seatback Storage โœ“ โœ“
Leather Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Three Zone Climate Control โœ“ โœ“
Rear Ventilation Ducts โœ“ โ€”
Dual Vanity Mirrors โœ“ โœ“
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors โœ“ โœ“
3rd Row Cupholders โ€” โœ“
Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control โ€” โœ“
Interior Air Filtration โ€” โœ“
In Car Entertainment
Feature Mazda Toyota
Infotainment Display 12.3 in 8.0 in
AM/FM Stereo โœ“ โœ“
Speaker System 8 6
Android Auto (Wireless) โœ“ โœ“
Apple CarPlay (Wireless) โœ“ โœ“
USB Port โœ“ โœ“
USB Port with External Media Control โœ“ โœ“
Speed Sensitive Volume Control โœ“ โ€”
Satellite Radio โ€” โœ“
Satellite Radio Trial Period โ€” 3 months
Power Feature
Feature Mazda Toyota
One-Touch Power Windows 4 4
Moonroof Type 1st Row Power Glass โ€”
Keyless Entry โœ“ โœ“
Heated Mirrors โœ“ โœ“
Frontseats
Feature Mazda Toyota
Front Head Room 39.7 in. 41.2 in.
Front Leg Room 41.7 in. 42.0 in.
Front Shoulder Room 59.2 in. 59.0 in.
Front Hip Room 56.2 in. 57.2 in.
Seat Material: Leather โœ“ โ€”
Front Seat Type: Bucket โœ“ โœ“
Driver Seat Power Adjustments 8-way 8-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment โœ“ โœ“
Driver Seat Lumbar Support Power โ€”
Passenger Seat Power Adjustments 4-way โ€”
Driver Seat Heating Multi-level โ€”
Passenger Seat Heating Multi-level โ€”
Seat Material: Cloth โ€” โœ“
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments โ€” 4-way
Rearseats
Feature Mazda Toyota
Rear Head Room 39.3 in. 39.4 in.
Rear Leg Room 39.4 in. 38.7 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 58.1 in. 58.7 in.
Rear Hip Room 55.5 in. 57.0 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback โœ“ โœ“
Reclining Rear Seats โœ“ โœ“
Folding Center Armrest โœ“ โœ“
Manual Folding Third Row Seat โ€” โœ“
Tires and Wheels
Feature Mazda Toyota
Wheel Material Alloy โ€”
Wheel Size 19 x 8.5 in โ€”
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size 265/55R19 P235/65R V
Spare Tire Type Temporary Temporary
Spare Tire Location Inside Mounted Underbody Mounted
Wheel Finish โ€” Painted Alloy
Wheel Diameter โ€” 18 in
Suspension
Feature Mazda Toyota
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension โœ“ โœ“
Stabilizer Bar โœ“ โ€”
Front Stabilizer Bar โ€” โœ“
Rear Stabilizer Bar โ€” โœ“
Warranty
Feature Mazda Toyota
Basic Warranty 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 5 yr./ unlimited mi. 5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 2 yr./ unlimited mi.
Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance โ€” 2 yr./ 25000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda CX-70 and 2025 Toyota Highlander.

Which vehicle is genuinely bigger inside for hauling gear?

The 2025 Mazda CX-70 is the clear winner for cargo volume, offering 39.6 cu ft. The 2025 Toyota Highlander lists a much smaller 16 cu ft, suggesting the CX-70 provides significantly more utility for large items.

Does the slight MPG difference between these two matter for daily driving?

Both cars achieve 25 MPG combined, so the difference is marginal; however, the Highlander wins on the open road with 29 MPG highway versus the CX-70โ€™s 28 MPG.

If I'm looking for a punchier drive, which one should I pick?

If you want quicker acceleration, the Mazda CX-70 is the superior choice, generating 280 horsepower and 332 lb-ft of torque, beating the Highlander's 265 hp and 310 lb-ft.

What is the main difference regarding standard drive type?

The Mazda CX-70 comes standard with All-Wheel Drive (AWD), whereas the base model Toyota Highlander utilizes Front Wheel Drive (FWD).

How close are the starting MSRPs for these two crossovers?

They are almost identical in price; the Highlander starts at $40,320, costing only $125 less than the Mazda CX-70, which begins at $40,445.

Are these vehicles compatible with regular unleaded fuel?

Yes, both the 2025 Mazda CX-70 and the 2025 Toyota Highlander are designed to run efficiently on regular unleaded gasoline.

More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool