2025 Mazda CX-50 vs 2026 Volvo XC40

Mazda CX-50

$30,500 · Crossover

vs
Volvo XC40

$39,900 · Crossover

Comparison Overview

Choosing between the stylish 2025 Mazda CX-50 and the premium 2026 Volvo XC40 often boils down to budget versus badge appeal. If saving cash is paramount, the Mazda offers significant savings, starting at $30,500 compared to the Volvo’s $39,900—a difference of $9,400 right off the bat. While both offer comparable efficiency, with the CX-50 achieving 28 MPG combined versus the XC40's 27 MPG combined, the Mazda comes standard with All-Wheel Drive, while the Volvo utilizes Front-Wheel Drive in its base configuration. Furthermore, the CX-50 provides substantially more utility, boasting 31.4 cubic feet of cargo space versus the XC40’s 20.4 cubic feet, making the Mazda the more practical choice for hauling gear or groceries while still delivering a respectable 187 horsepower.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

🚗 Best for Commuters

2025 Mazda CX-50

The Mazda CX-50 wins for commuters due to its standard All-Wheel Drive capability and lower running costs, as it uses regular unleaded fuel.

👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Best for Families

2025 Mazda CX-50

The CX-50 is the better family choice because it offers 11 cubic feet more usable cargo capacity than the XC40.

🏎️ Best for Enthusiasts

2026 Volvo XC40

The Volvo XC40 appeals more to enthusiasts by offering higher torque at 221 lb-ft and a more modern 8-speed automatic transmission.

💰 Best Value

2025 Mazda CX-50

The Mazda CX-50 is the clear value winner, providing greater utility and AWD standard for $9,400 less than the Volvo.

Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...

  • You need maximum cargo space, as the CX-50 provides 31.4 cu ft versus the XC40's 20.4 cu ft.
  • Saving money upfront is critical, given the CX-50’s MSRP is $9,400 lower than the XC40.
  • You prefer the confidence of standard All-Wheel Drive paired with a lower-cost regular unleaded fuel requirement.

Choose the Volvo XC40 if...

  • You prioritize torque, as the XC40 delivers 221 lb-ft, which is notably higher than the CX-50's 185 lb-ft.
  • You prefer a slightly taller vehicle profile, as the XC40 measures 65.2 inches high compared to the CX-50's 63.5 inches.
  • You want the smoother shifting of an 8-speed automatic transmission instead of the Mazda's 6-speed unit.

Key Dimensions

Dimension Mazda CX-50 Volvo XC40
Length 185.8" 174.8"
Width 75.6" 76.3"
Height 63.5" 65.2"
Wheelbase 110.8" 106.4"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Mazda Volvo
Blind Spot Monitor
Lane Departure Warning
Lane Keeping Assist System
Rear Cross Traffic Alert
Driver Attention Alert
Pre-Collision Safety System
Post-Collision Safety System
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags
Front Head Airbags
Rear Head Airbags
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation
Electronic Stability Control
Traction Control System
LATCH System
Rear Door Child Safety Locks
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes
Rear Solid Disc Brakes
Brake Assist
Tire Pressure Monitoring System
Automatic Headlights
Headlight Delay-Off
LED Headlights
Daytime Running Lights
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors
Front Headrests 2 2
Front Height Adjustable Headrests
Rear Headrests 3 3
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt
Engine Immobilizer
Front Solid Disc Brakes
Rear Folding Headrests
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote)
Engine
Feature Mazda Volvo
Base Engine Displacement 2.5 L 2.0 L
Number of Cylinders inline 4 inline 4
Base Engine Type gas mild hybrid
Horsepower 187 hp @ 6000 rpm 194 hp @ 4800 rpm
Torque 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm 221 lb-ft @ 1500 rpm
Number of Valves 16 16
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type
Cylinder Deactivation
Drive Train
Feature Mazda Volvo
Transmission Type 6-speed shiftable automatic 8-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type all wheel drive front wheel drive
Hill Descent Control
Fuel
Feature Mazda Volvo
Fuel Type regular unleaded premium unleaded (recommended)
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 25/31 MPG 25/32 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 28 MPG 27 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 397.5/492.9 mi. 355.0/454.4 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 15.9 gal. 14.2 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Mazda Volvo
Push Button Start
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel
Electric Power Steering
Rear View Camera
Adaptive Cruise Control
Front Cupholders
Rear Cupholders
Front Door Pockets
Rear Door Pockets
Overhead Console with Storage
Front Seatback Storage
Leather Steering Wheel
Dual Zone Climate Control
Rear Ventilation Ducts
Interior Air Filtration
Dual Vanity Mirrors
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors
Front View Camera
Front Parking Sensors
Rear Parking Sensors
Wireless Charging Pad
Simulated Alloy Trim on Steering Wheel
Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror
In Car Entertainment
Feature Mazda Volvo
Infotainment Display 10.3 in 12.3 in
AM/FM Stereo
Speaker System 8 8
Android Auto (Wireless)
Apple CarPlay (Wireless)
USB Port
USB Port with External Media Control
Stereo Power 250W
Android Auto (Wired)
Apple CarPlay (Wired)
Satellite Radio
Satellite Radio Trial Period 3 months
Power Feature
Feature Mazda Volvo
One-Touch Power Windows 4 4
Keyless Entry
Heated Mirrors
Reverse Tilt Dual Mirrors
Frontseats
Feature Mazda Volvo
Front Head Room 39.1 in. 39.0 in.
Front Leg Room 41.7 in. 40.9 in.
Front Shoulder Room 55.9 in. 56.7 in.
Front Hip Room 53.6 in. 54.7 in.
Seat Material: Leatherette
Front Seat Type: Bucket
Driver Seat Manual Adjustments 6-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments 4-way 8-way
Seat Material: Cloth
Driver Seat Power Adjustments 8-way
Driver Seat Lumbar Support Power
Driver Seat Memory Settings 2
Passenger Seat Height Adjustment
Passenger Seat Lumbar Support Power
Driver Seat Heating Multi-level
Passenger Seat Heating Multi-level
Rearseats
Feature Mazda Volvo
Rear Head Room 38.6 in. 39.1 in.
Rear Leg Room 39.8 in. 36.1 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 53.6 in. 56.3 in.
Rear Hip Room 52.1 in. 54.6 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback
Folding Center Armrest
Folding Rear Seat Feature
Pass-Thru Center Armrest
Tires and Wheels
Feature Mazda Volvo
Wheel Finish Painted Alloy Painted Alloy
Wheel Size 17 x 7.0 in
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size P225/65R17 235/55R18
Spare Tire Type Temporary Temporary
Spare Tire Location Inside Mounted Inside Mounted
Wheel Diameter 18 in
Suspension
Feature Mazda Volvo
Front Suspension Type Independent
Stabilizer Bar
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension
Front Stabilizer Bar
Rear Stabilizer Bar
Warranty
Feature Mazda Volvo
Basic Warranty 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 4 yr./ 50000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 4 yr./ 50000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 5 yr./ unlimited mi. 12 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 4 yr./ unlimited mi.
Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance 2 yr./ 20000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda CX-50 and 2026 Volvo XC40.

Is the standard drivetrain of the CX-50 better for driving conditions than the XC40?

Yes, the 2025 Mazda CX-50 comes standard with All-Wheel Drive, making it more capable in varied weather. The 2026 Volvo XC40, however, comes standard with Front-Wheel Drive, although both vehicles offer similar combined MPG ratings around 27-28 MPG.

How much more storage space does the Mazda CX-50 really offer?

The difference is substantial: the CX-50 provides 31.4 cubic feet of cargo capacity, which is exactly 11 cubic feet more than the Volvo XC40’s 20.4 cubic feet. This means the Mazda is much better suited for large grocery hauls or bulky weekend gear.

Which car will cost more to fuel regularly?

The 2026 Volvo XC40 recommends premium unleaded fuel, while the 2025 Mazda CX-50 runs happily on regular unleaded. This difference, combined with the $9,400 initial price gap, leans the long-term running costs toward the Mazda.

Does the Volvo XC40 have significantly more power than the Mazda CX-50?

While the XC40 has higher output with 194 horsepower and 221 lb-ft of torque, the CX-50 is not far behind at 187 horsepower and 185 lb-ft of torque. The Volvo’s advantage is mostly felt in torque, which is useful for immediate acceleration.

Since the CX-50 is bigger, is the XC40 much easier to park?

The Volvo XC40 is slightly shorter in length at 174.8 inches versus the CX-50's 185.8 inches, potentially making it easier to slot into tight parallel spaces. However, the XC40 is slightly wider at 76.3 inches compared to the CX-50's 75.6 inches.

What is the main reason to justify the extra cost of the Volvo XC40?

The primary justifications for the higher $39,900 MSRP for the XC40 are its higher torque figure (221 lb-ft) and its smoother 8-speed automatic transmission, features appealing to those prioritizing driving dynamics over absolute value.

More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool