2025 Mazda CX-50 vs 2026 Toyota Highlander Hybrid
Comparison Overview
Choosing between the sporty efficiency of the 2025 Mazda CX-50 and the spacious hybrid economy of the 2026 Toyota Highlander Hybrid presents a classic dilemma: initial cost versus long-term running expense and size. The CX-50 starts appealingly low at an MSRP of $30,500, significantly undercutting the Highlander Hybrid's $47,020 price tag—a difference of $16,520 right off the lot. While the Mazda offers a solid 28 MPG combined, the Highlander Hybrid pulls ahead significantly with an excellent 35 MPG combined, which will save money over time. However, the Mazda’s 187 hp is noticeably less than the Highlander's 243 hp. For city dwellers prioritizing affordability and nimble size (185.8 inches long), the CX-50 is compelling; for larger families needing extra space and better fuel economy despite the higher price, the larger, taller (68.1 inches) Highlander leads.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Mazda CX-50
The Mazda CX-50 wins for commuters due to its lower starting price of $30,500 and better city MPG rating of 25 MPG.
2026 Toyota Highlander Hybrid
The 2026 Toyota Highlander Hybrid is the family choice because it is larger overall and offers superior combined fuel efficiency at 35 MPG.
2026 Toyota Highlander Hybrid
The Highlander Hybrid appeals more to driving enthusiasts because it boasts 243 hp compared to the CX-50's 187 hp.
2025 Mazda CX-50
The Mazda CX-50 provides significantly better value upfront, costing $16,520 less than the Highlander Hybrid.
Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...
- You want to save $16,520 immediately, as the CX-50 starts at just $30,500.
- You prefer a more compact vehicle, as the CX-50 is 185.8 inches long versus the Highlander's 194.9 inches.
- You don't mind slightly lower power (187 hp) in exchange for utilizing regular unleaded fuel and excellent standard AWD.
Choose the Toyota Highlander Hybrid if...
- Long-term fuel savings matter most, given the Highlander Hybrid's 35 MPG combined rating.
- You need substantially more performance, benefiting from 243 hp and a faster transmission.
- Your family requires more room, evidenced by the Highlander's greater height (68.1 inches) and superior capacity for passengers (implied by size, despite lower listed cargo space).
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Mazda CX-50 | Toyota Highlander Hybrid |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 185.8" | 194.9" |
| Width | 75.6" | 76.0" |
| Height | 63.5" | 68.1" |
| Wheelbase | 110.8" | 112.2" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | — |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 2 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | — |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third Row Head Airbags | — | ✓ |
| Front Fog Lights | — | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.5 L | 2.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | hybrid |
| Horsepower | 187 hp @ 6000 rpm | 243 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | — |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cylinder Deactivation | ✓ | — |
Drive Train
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | continuously variable-speed automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | all wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 25/31 MPG | 35/35 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 28 MPG | 35 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 397.5/492.9 mi. | 598.5/598.5 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 15.9 gal. | 17.1 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | ✓ | — |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | — | ✓ |
| Universal Remote Transmitter | — | ✓ |
| 3rd Row Cupholders | — | ✓ |
| Three Zone Climate Control | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control | — | ✓ |
| Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 10.3 in | 8.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 8 | 6 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | — | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | — | 3 months |
Power Feature
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 4 |
| Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Moonroof Type | — | 1st Row Power Glass |
Frontseats
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 39.1 in. | 39.6 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.7 in. | 42.0 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 55.9 in. | 59.0 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 53.6 in. | 57.2 in. |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | — |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | — |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | — | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | — | Power |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | — | 8-way |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | — | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Heating | — | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | — | Multi-level |
Rearseats
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.6 in. | 39.4 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 39.8 in. | 38.7 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 53.6 in. | 58.4 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 52.1 in. | 57.0 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | — |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | — |
| Folding Rear Seatback | — | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | — | ✓ |
| Manual Folding Third Row Seat | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | — |
| Wheel Size | 17 x 7.0 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | P225/65R17 | P235/65R18 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Underbody Mounted |
| Wheel Material | — | Alloy |
| Wheel Diameter | — | 18 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | — |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | — | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 2 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Hybrid Component Warranty | — | 8 yr./ 100000 mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | — | 2 yr./ 25000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda CX-50 and 2026 Toyota Highlander Hybrid.
How much more fuel-efficient is the 2026 Highlander Hybrid than the 2025 CX-50?
The Highlander Hybrid is significantly more efficient, achieving 35 MPG combined, which is 7 MPG better than the CX-50's combined rating of 28 MPG. This efficiency gap is noticeable given the CX-50 offers 25/31 MPG city/highway, while the Toyota delivers a consistent 35/35 MPG.
Is the major price difference between the two worth the power increase?
The Highlander Hybrid commands a premium of $16,520 over the CX-50's MSRP, but it delivers 243 hp compared to the Mazda's 187 hp. Whether it's 'worth it' depends on if you prioritize that 56 hp boost and hybrid tech over immediate savings.
Which crossover is better equipped for poor weather driving?
Both vehicles come standard with All-Wheel Drive (AWD), making them suitable for adverse conditions. However, the Highlander Hybrid is physically larger and rides taller at 68.1 inches, which might offer slightly more ground clearance confidence than the 63.5-inch tall CX-50.
Does the Mazda CX-50 offer better cargo space than the Highlander Hybrid?
No, the Mazda CX-50 actually offers substantially more usable cargo volume at 31.4 cubic feet compared to the 2026 Toyota Highlander Hybrid's 16 cubic feet. This might be surprising given the Highlander's overall larger dimensions.
What kind of gas do these SUVs require?
Both the 2025 Mazda CX-50 and the 2026 Toyota Highlander Hybrid are designed to run on regular unleaded fuel. This keeps the day-to-day fueling costs predictable for both models.
Which vehicle has a more engaging transmission setup?
The Mazda CX-50 uses a traditional 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission, which many driving enthusiasts prefer for a more connected feel than the Highlander Hybrid’s continuously variable-speed automatic (CVT).
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool