2025 Mazda CX-50 vs 2026 GMC Terrain
Comparison Overview
Trying to decide between the rugged Mazda CX-50 and the newly styled GMC Terrain? This comparison boils down to priorities. The 2025 Mazda CX-50 offers better efficiency, achieving 28 MPG combined compared to the 2026 Terrain’s 27 MPG, and it comes standard with capable All-Wheel Drive (AWD), while the Terrain defaults to Front-Wheel Drive (FWD). Power output also favors the Mazda, with 187 hp versus the Terrain's 175 hp, though torque figures are similar (185 lb-ft vs 184 lb-ft). Pricewise, the CX-50 starts slightly higher at $30,500 versus the Terrain's $30,100 MSRP. While the CX-50 is slightly longer at 185.8 inches, the Terrain is noticeably taller at 65.8 inches, which might benefit headroom. Cargo space is also different, with the CX-50 leading at 31.4 cubic feet against the Terrain’s 29.8 cubic feet.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Mazda CX-50
The CX-50 is the better choice for daily commuters due to its superior combined fuel economy of 28 MPG.
2025 Mazda CX-50
The CX-50 offers more useful storage space with 31.4 cubic feet of cargo capacity compared to the Terrain's 29.8 cubic feet.
2025 Mazda CX-50
Enthusiasts will prefer the CX-50's extra 12 horsepower and standard AWD system for better handling potential.
2026 GMC Terrain
The Terrain presents a better initial value proposition with a lower MSRP of $30,100, even with FWD.
Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...
- You need better fuel efficiency, achieving 28 MPG combined.
- You prioritize standard All-Wheel Drive capability for varied weather.
- You want slightly more hauling capacity, offering 31.4 cubic feet of cargo room.
Choose the GMC Terrain if...
- Your primary concern is the lowest starting price at $30,100 MSRP.
- You prefer a taller ride height, as the Terrain stands 65.8 inches tall.
- You are comfortable with a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) over a traditional automatic.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Mazda CX-50 | GMC Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 185.8" | 181.0" |
| Width | 75.6" | 74.5" |
| Height | 63.5" | 65.8" |
| Wheelbase | 110.8" | 107.5" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Mazda | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | — |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cross Traffic Alert | — | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Mazda | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.5 L | 1.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 187 hp @ 6000 rpm | 175 hp @ 5600 rpm |
| Torque | 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 184 lb-ft @ 1750 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cylinder Deactivation | ✓ | — |
Drive Train
| Feature | Mazda | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | continuously variable-speed automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | front wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Mazda | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 25/31 MPG | 26/28 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 28 MPG | 27 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 397.5/492.9 mi. | 384.8/414.4 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 15.9 gal. | 14.8 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Mazda | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | — |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Rear Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
| Heated Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Mazda | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 10.3 in | 15.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 8 | 6 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auxiliary Audio Input | — | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | — | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | — | 3 months |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Mazda | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 4 |
| Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Mazda | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 39.1 in. | 40.6 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.7 in. | 44.0 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 55.9 in. | 57.7 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 53.6 in. | 55.3 in. |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
| Seat Material: Premium Cloth | — | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Heating | — | Multi-level |
Rearseats
| Feature | Mazda | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.6 in. | 39.2 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 39.8 in. | 39.7 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 53.6 in. | 55.7 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 52.1 in. | 51.0 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Mazda | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Size | 17 x 7.0 in | 17 x 7.0 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | P225/65R17 | 235/65R17 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
Suspension
| Feature | Mazda | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | — |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Mazda | GMC |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 6 yr./ 100000 mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | — | 1 yr./ unlimited mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda CX-50 and 2026 GMC Terrain.
Which crossover is more powerful between the 2025 CX-50 and the 2026 Terrain?
The 2025 Mazda CX-50 holds a clear power advantage, producing 187 horsepower, whereas the 2026 GMC Terrain delivers 175 horsepower. While both have similar torque ratings, the Mazda offers slightly punchier acceleration.
Is the extra cost of the CX-50 worth the better gas mileage?
The CX-50 starts at $30,500 compared to the Terrain's $30,100. If you drive long distances, the CX-50’s 28 MPG combined might offset the initial $400 price difference faster than the Terrain’s 27 MPG.
How do their driving dynamics compare based on the provided specs?
The Mazda CX-50 comes standard with All-Wheel Drive and uses a 6-speed shiftable automatic, generally favored by drivers seeking more engagement. The Terrain uses Front-Wheel Drive and a CVT, which is often geared more toward smooth, efficient cruising.
If I frequently load up the back, which crossover offers more utility?
The Mazda CX-50 is superior for hauling needs, offering 31.4 cubic feet of cargo capacity. The 2026 GMC Terrain trails slightly behind with 29.8 cubic feet behind the rear seats.
Is one vehicle noticeably bigger than the other for parking purposes?
The dimensions are quite similar, but the CX-50 is 185.8 inches long versus the Terrain’s 181.0 inches, making the Mazda marginally longer. However, the Terrain is taller by nearly 2.3 inches.
Do I need premium fuel for either of these vehicles?
No, both the 2025 Mazda CX-50 and the 2026 GMC Terrain are designed to run on standard unleaded fuel, keeping your running costs predictable.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool