2025 Mazda CX-50 vs 2025 Toyota 4Runner
Comparison Overview
The 2025 Mazda CX-50 bursts onto the scene with a refined edge, sporting 187 hp and an excellent 28 MPG combined efficiency, perfectly suited for the daily grind. In stark contrast, the rugged 2025 Toyota 4Runner enters the fray prioritizing brute strength, delivering a stout 278 hp and 317 lb-ft of torque, ready for serious adventure. This comparison pits sleek efficiency against imposing capability. The price gap is significant, with the 4Runner commanding an extra $10,770 over the CX-50's $30,500 starting MSRP. While the CX-50 offers superior fuel economy (28 MPG vs. 22 MPG), the 4Runner boasts substantially more space, hauling 48.4 cubic feet of cargo compared to the CX-50's 31.4 cu ft. Enthusiasts seeking immediate gratification will gravitate toward the 4Runner's massive 91 hp advantage.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Mazda CX-50
The Mazda CX-50 wins for commuters due to its significantly better 28 combined MPG versus the 4Runner's 22 MPG.
2025 Toyota 4Runner
The Toyota 4Runner is the family winner, offering 48.4 cubic feet of cargo capacity, far exceeding the CX-50's 31.4 cubic feet.
2025 Toyota 4Runner
Enthusiasts will choose the 4Runner for its muscular 278 hp and dominant 317 lb-ft of torque.
2025 Mazda CX-50
The CX-50 presents superior value by undercutting the 4Runner's MSRP by $10,770 while still delivering AWD.
Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...
- You prioritize cost savings, as the CX-50 starts $10,770 lower than the 4Runner.
- Daily driving efficiency is key, highlighted by the CX-50's 28 combined MPG rating.
- You prefer a more agile footprint, with the CX-50 being 9.1 inches shorter in length.
Choose the Toyota 4Runner if...
- You require serious towing or off-road muscle, thanks to the 4Runner's 278 hp.
- Maximum utility is necessary, given the 4Runner's massive 48.4 cubic feet of cargo space.
- You prefer the security of the 4Runner's larger dimensions (78.0 inches wide and 72.6 inches tall).
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Mazda CX-50 | Toyota 4Runner |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 185.8" | 194.9" |
| Width | 75.6" | 78.0" |
| Height | 63.5" | 72.6" |
| Wheelbase | 110.8" | 112.2" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | โ | โ |
| Lane Departure Warning | โ | โ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | โ | โ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | โ | โ |
| Driver Attention Alert | โ | โ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | โ | โ |
| Front Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Rear Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | โ | โ |
| Electronic Stability Control | โ | โ |
| Traction Control System | โ | โ |
| LATCH System | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | โ | โ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Brake Assist | โ | โ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | โ | โ |
| Automatic Headlights | โ | โ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | โ | โ |
| LED Headlights | โ | โ |
| Daytime Running Lights | โ | โ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | โ | โ |
| Engine Immobilizer | โ | โ |
| Front Cross Traffic Alert | โ | โ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Front Fog Lights | โ | โ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | โ | โ |
Engine
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.5 L | 2.4 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 187 hp @ 6000 rpm | 278 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 317 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | โ | โ |
| Cylinder Deactivation | โ | โ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 25/31 MPG | 20/26 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 28 MPG | 22 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 397.5/492.9 mi. | 380.0/494.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 15.9 gal. | 19.0 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | โ | โ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Electric Power Steering | โ | โ |
| Rear View Camera | โ | โ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | โ | โ |
| Front Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Rear Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Front Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | โ | โ |
| Front Seatback Storage | โ | โ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | โ | โ |
| Interior Air Filtration | โ | โ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Simulated Alloy Trim on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 10.3 in | 8.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | โ | โ |
| Speaker System | 8 | 8 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | โ | โ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | โ | โ |
| USB Port | โ | โ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | โ | โ |
| Satellite Radio | โ | โ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | โ | 3 months |
Power Feature
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 4 |
| Keyless Entry | โ | โ |
| Heated Mirrors | โ | โ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 39.1 in. | 39.7 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.7 in. | 41.8 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 55.9 in. | 58.0 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 53.6 in. | 55.2 in. |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | โ | โ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | โ | โ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | โ | โ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 6-way |
| Seat Material: Cloth | โ | โ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | โ | Power |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | โ | โ |
Rearseats
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.6 in. | 37.8 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 39.8 in. | 34.8 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 53.6 in. | 57.8 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 52.1 in. | 56.1 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | โ | โ |
| Folding Center Armrest | โ | โ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | โ | โ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Size | 17 x 7.0 in | โ |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | P225/65R17 | P245/70R17 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | โ |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | โ |
| Wheel Diameter | โ | 17 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | โ |
| Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | โ | โ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
Warranty
| Feature | Mazda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 2 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | โ | 2 yr./ 25000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda CX-50 and 2025 Toyota 4Runner.
How does the difference in horsepower affect driving feel between these two models?
The 2025 Toyota 4Runner possesses a commanding 91 hp advantage over the CX-50, delivering 278 hp versus 187 hp. This means the 4Runner offers significantly quicker acceleration and better power reserves for towing or climbing, while the CX-50 focuses on smoother, economical cruising.
Is the price difference worth paying for the 4Runner?
The 4Runner demands an extra $10,770, starting at $41,270 compared to the CX-50's $30,500. This premium buys you substantial gains in power (317 lb-ft of torque) and vastly superior cargo capacity (48.4 cu ft vs. 31.4 cu ft).
Which vehicle is genuinely better for long-distance highway commuting?
The Mazda CX-50 is the superior choice for commuting, netting 28 combined MPG versus the 4Runner's 22 combined MPG. While both use regular unleaded fuel, the CX-50โs efficiency saves substantial fuel costs over 15,000 miles annually.
Does the CX-50's smaller size hurt its utility compared to the 4Runner?
Yes, the CX-50 is considerably smaller, offering only 31.4 cubic feet of cargo room behind the rear seats. Conversely, the 4Runner provides a cavernous 48.4 cubic feet, reflecting its larger overall dimensions.
What are the implications of the different drivetrain layouts (AWD vs. RWD)?
The CX-50 uses All-Wheel Drive for enhanced traction in varying conditions, fitting its crossover nature. The 4Runner uses Rear-Wheel Drive standard, which is often preferred for rugged, truck-based durability and dedicated 4x4 applications when equipped.
Which vehicle offers a more modern transmission experience?
While both use automatic transmissions, the 4Runner utilizes a more advanced 8-speed unit compared to the CX-50's 6-speed automatic, suggesting potentially smoother shifts and slightly better utilization of its higher power output.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool