2025 Mazda CX-50 vs 2025 Toyota 4Runner

Mazda CX-50

$30,500 ยท Crossover

vs
Toyota 4Runner

$41,270 ยท SUV

Comparison Overview

The 2025 Mazda CX-50 bursts onto the scene with a refined edge, sporting 187 hp and an excellent 28 MPG combined efficiency, perfectly suited for the daily grind. In stark contrast, the rugged 2025 Toyota 4Runner enters the fray prioritizing brute strength, delivering a stout 278 hp and 317 lb-ft of torque, ready for serious adventure. This comparison pits sleek efficiency against imposing capability. The price gap is significant, with the 4Runner commanding an extra $10,770 over the CX-50's $30,500 starting MSRP. While the CX-50 offers superior fuel economy (28 MPG vs. 22 MPG), the 4Runner boasts substantially more space, hauling 48.4 cubic feet of cargo compared to the CX-50's 31.4 cu ft. Enthusiasts seeking immediate gratification will gravitate toward the 4Runner's massive 91 hp advantage.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

๐Ÿš— Best for Commuters

2025 Mazda CX-50

The Mazda CX-50 wins for commuters due to its significantly better 28 combined MPG versus the 4Runner's 22 MPG.

๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ‘งโ€๐Ÿ‘ฆ Best for Families

2025 Toyota 4Runner

The Toyota 4Runner is the family winner, offering 48.4 cubic feet of cargo capacity, far exceeding the CX-50's 31.4 cubic feet.

๐ŸŽ๏ธ Best for Enthusiasts

2025 Toyota 4Runner

Enthusiasts will choose the 4Runner for its muscular 278 hp and dominant 317 lb-ft of torque.

๐Ÿ’ฐ Best Value

2025 Mazda CX-50

The CX-50 presents superior value by undercutting the 4Runner's MSRP by $10,770 while still delivering AWD.

Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...

  • You prioritize cost savings, as the CX-50 starts $10,770 lower than the 4Runner.
  • Daily driving efficiency is key, highlighted by the CX-50's 28 combined MPG rating.
  • You prefer a more agile footprint, with the CX-50 being 9.1 inches shorter in length.

Choose the Toyota 4Runner if...

  • You require serious towing or off-road muscle, thanks to the 4Runner's 278 hp.
  • Maximum utility is necessary, given the 4Runner's massive 48.4 cubic feet of cargo space.
  • You prefer the security of the 4Runner's larger dimensions (78.0 inches wide and 72.6 inches tall).

Key Dimensions

Dimension Mazda CX-50 Toyota 4Runner
Length 185.8" 194.9"
Width 75.6" 78.0"
Height 63.5" 72.6"
Wheelbase 110.8" 112.2"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Mazda Toyota
Blind Spot Monitor โœ“ โœ“
Lane Departure Warning โœ“ โœ“
Lane Keeping Assist System โœ“ โœ“
Rear Cross Traffic Alert โœ“ โœ“
Driver Attention Alert โœ“ โ€”
Pre-Collision Safety System โœ“ โœ“
Post-Collision Safety System โœ“ โœ“
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Front Head Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Rear Head Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation โœ“ โœ“
Electronic Stability Control โœ“ โœ“
Traction Control System โœ“ โœ“
LATCH System โœ“ โœ“
Rear Door Child Safety Locks โœ“ โœ“
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes โœ“ โœ“
Rear Solid Disc Brakes โœ“ โ€”
Brake Assist โœ“ โœ“
Tire Pressure Monitoring System โœ“ โœ“
Automatic Headlights โœ“ โœ“
Headlight Delay-Off โœ“ โœ“
LED Headlights โœ“ โœ“
Daytime Running Lights โœ“ โœ“
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors โœ“ โ€”
Front Headrests 2 2
Front Height Adjustable Headrests โœ“ โœ“
Rear Headrests 3 3
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests โœ“ โœ“
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt โœ“ โœ“
Engine Immobilizer โœ“ โ€”
Front Cross Traffic Alert โ€” โœ“
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes โ€” โœ“
Front Fog Lights โ€” โœ“
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) โ€” โœ“
Engine
Feature Mazda Toyota
Base Engine Displacement 2.5 L 2.4 L
Number of Cylinders inline 4 inline 4
Base Engine Type gas gas
Horsepower 187 hp @ 6000 rpm 278 hp @ 6000 rpm
Torque 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm 317 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm
Number of Valves 16 16
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type โœ“ โœ“
Cylinder Deactivation โœ“ โ€”
Drive Train
Feature Mazda Toyota
Transmission Type 6-speed shiftable automatic 8-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type all wheel drive rear wheel drive
Fuel
Feature Mazda Toyota
Fuel Type regular unleaded regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 25/31 MPG 20/26 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 28 MPG 22 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 397.5/492.9 mi. 380.0/494.0 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 15.9 gal. 19.0 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Mazda Toyota
Push Button Start โœ“ โœ“
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Electric Power Steering โœ“ โœ“
Rear View Camera โœ“ โœ“
Adaptive Cruise Control โœ“ โœ“
Front Cupholders โœ“ โœ“
Rear Cupholders โœ“ โœ“
Front Door Pockets โœ“ โœ“
Rear Door Pockets โœ“ โœ“
Overhead Console with Storage โœ“ โœ“
Front Seatback Storage โœ“ โœ“
Leather Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Dual Zone Climate Control โœ“ โ€”
Rear Ventilation Ducts โœ“ โœ“
Interior Air Filtration โœ“ โœ“
Dual Vanity Mirrors โœ“ โœ“
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors โœ“ โ€”
Simulated Alloy Trim on Steering Wheel โ€” โœ“
Single Zone Climate Control โ€” โœ“
In Car Entertainment
Feature Mazda Toyota
Infotainment Display 10.3 in 8.0 in
AM/FM Stereo โœ“ โœ“
Speaker System 8 8
Android Auto (Wireless) โœ“ โœ“
Apple CarPlay (Wireless) โœ“ โœ“
USB Port โœ“ โœ“
USB Port with External Media Control โœ“ โœ“
Satellite Radio โ€” โœ“
Satellite Radio Trial Period โ€” 3 months
Power Feature
Feature Mazda Toyota
One-Touch Power Windows 4 4
Keyless Entry โœ“ โœ“
Heated Mirrors โœ“ โœ“
Frontseats
Feature Mazda Toyota
Front Head Room 39.1 in. 39.7 in.
Front Leg Room 41.7 in. 41.8 in.
Front Shoulder Room 55.9 in. 58.0 in.
Front Hip Room 53.6 in. 55.2 in.
Seat Material: Leatherette โœ“ โ€”
Front Seat Type: Bucket โœ“ โœ“
Driver Seat Manual Adjustments 6-way 6-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment โœ“ โœ“
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments 4-way 6-way
Seat Material: Cloth โ€” โœ“
Driver Seat Lumbar Support โ€” Power
Passenger Seat Height Adjustment โ€” โœ“
Rearseats
Feature Mazda Toyota
Rear Head Room 38.6 in. 37.8 in.
Rear Leg Room 39.8 in. 34.8 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 53.6 in. 57.8 in.
Rear Hip Room 52.1 in. 56.1 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback โœ“ โœ“
Folding Center Armrest โœ“ โœ“
Reclining Rear Seats โ€” โœ“
Tires and Wheels
Feature Mazda Toyota
Wheel Finish Painted Alloy Painted Alloy
Wheel Size 17 x 7.0 in โ€”
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size P225/65R17 P245/70R17
Spare Tire Type Temporary โ€”
Spare Tire Location Inside Mounted โ€”
Wheel Diameter โ€” 17 in
Suspension
Feature Mazda Toyota
Front Suspension Type Independent โ€”
Stabilizer Bar โœ“ โ€”
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension โ€” โœ“
Front Stabilizer Bar โ€” โœ“
Rear Stabilizer Bar โ€” โœ“
Warranty
Feature Mazda Toyota
Basic Warranty 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 5 yr./ unlimited mi. 5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 2 yr./ unlimited mi.
Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance โ€” 2 yr./ 25000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda CX-50 and 2025 Toyota 4Runner.

How does the difference in horsepower affect driving feel between these two models?

The 2025 Toyota 4Runner possesses a commanding 91 hp advantage over the CX-50, delivering 278 hp versus 187 hp. This means the 4Runner offers significantly quicker acceleration and better power reserves for towing or climbing, while the CX-50 focuses on smoother, economical cruising.

Is the price difference worth paying for the 4Runner?

The 4Runner demands an extra $10,770, starting at $41,270 compared to the CX-50's $30,500. This premium buys you substantial gains in power (317 lb-ft of torque) and vastly superior cargo capacity (48.4 cu ft vs. 31.4 cu ft).

Which vehicle is genuinely better for long-distance highway commuting?

The Mazda CX-50 is the superior choice for commuting, netting 28 combined MPG versus the 4Runner's 22 combined MPG. While both use regular unleaded fuel, the CX-50โ€™s efficiency saves substantial fuel costs over 15,000 miles annually.

Does the CX-50's smaller size hurt its utility compared to the 4Runner?

Yes, the CX-50 is considerably smaller, offering only 31.4 cubic feet of cargo room behind the rear seats. Conversely, the 4Runner provides a cavernous 48.4 cubic feet, reflecting its larger overall dimensions.

What are the implications of the different drivetrain layouts (AWD vs. RWD)?

The CX-50 uses All-Wheel Drive for enhanced traction in varying conditions, fitting its crossover nature. The 4Runner uses Rear-Wheel Drive standard, which is often preferred for rugged, truck-based durability and dedicated 4x4 applications when equipped.

Which vehicle offers a more modern transmission experience?

While both use automatic transmissions, the 4Runner utilizes a more advanced 8-speed unit compared to the CX-50's 6-speed automatic, suggesting potentially smoother shifts and slightly better utilization of its higher power output.

More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool