2025 Mazda CX-50 vs 2025 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class
Comparison Overview
Choosing between the rugged utility of the 2025 Mazda CX-50 and the luxury stature of the 2025 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class often boils down to budget versus performance prestige. The most glaring difference is the MSRP, where the CX-50 starts at a very attractive $30,500 compared to the GLC-Class’s $49,250, a $18,750 gap. While the Mercedes offers a significant 255 hp, the Mazda’s 187 hp is adequate, and it pulls ahead slightly on efficiency, achieving 28 MPG combined versus the GLC’s 27 MPG. Interestingly, both vehicles are nearly identical in size, with the Mazda measuring 185.8 inches long, but the CX-50 provides noticeably more utility with 31.4 cubic feet of cargo space compared to the GLC’s 21.9 cubic feet. Finally, buyers must note the fuel requirements: the CX-50 runs happily on regular unleaded, while the GLC demands premium fuel.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Mazda CX-50
The CX-50 wins for commuters due to its lower entry price of $30,500 and use of regular unleaded fuel, saving money both upfront and at the pump.
2025 Mazda CX-50
The Mazda CX-50 is the family choice because it offers substantially more usable storage space with 31.4 cu ft versus the GLC-Class’s 21.9 cu ft.
2025 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class
Enthusiasts will prefer the Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class for its significantly greater output, boasting 255 hp and 295 lb-ft of torque compared to the CX-50's 187 hp.
2025 Mazda CX-50
The Mazda CX-50 represents superior overall value, costing $18,750 less while still providing standard all-wheel drive and better cargo capacity.
Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...
- You need the best value, as the $30,500 MSRP significantly undercuts the competition.
- You prioritize fuel cost savings by only needing regular unleaded fuel, unlike the GLC's premium requirement.
- You need maximum utility, benefiting from 31.4 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the GLC's 21.9 cu ft.
Choose the Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class if...
- You strongly desire high performance, given the GLC's significant 68 hp advantage (255 hp vs. 187 hp).
- You prefer a luxury badge and a more refined 9-speed automatic transmission.
- You prefer rear-wheel drive biased performance handling over the CX-50's standard all-wheel drive setup.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Mazda CX-50 | Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 185.8" | 185.7" |
| Width | 75.6" | 74.4" |
| Height | 63.5" | 64.6" |
| Wheelbase | 110.8" | 113.7" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | — |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | — |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | — |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Brake Drying | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Brake Preparation System | — | ✓ |
| Adaptive Headlights | — | ✓ |
| Front Power Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.5 L | 2.0 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | mild hybrid |
| Horsepower | 187 hp @ 6000 rpm | 255 hp @ 5800 rpm |
| Torque | 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 295 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cylinder Deactivation | ✓ | — |
Drive Train
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 9-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | premium unleaded (required) |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 25/31 MPG | 24/32 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 28 MPG | 27 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 397.5/492.9 mi. | 417.6/556.8 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 15.9 gal. | 17.4 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Power Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Front Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
| Automatic Parking Assist | — | ✓ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | — | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| Universal Remote Transmitter | — | ✓ |
| Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 10.3 in | 11.9 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 8 | 5 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Subwoofer Count | — | 1 |
| Satellite Radio | — | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | — | 6 months |
Power Feature
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 4 |
| Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Moonroof Type | — | 1st Row Power Glass |
Frontseats
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 39.1 in. | 41.3 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.7 in. | 40.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 55.9 in. | 57.3 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 53.6 in. | — |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | — |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | — |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | — | 10-way |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | — | Power |
| Driver Seat Thigh Extension | — | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Memory Settings | — | 3 |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | — | 10-way |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | — | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Lumbar Support | — | Power |
| Passenger Seat Thigh Extension | — | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Memory Settings | — | 3 |
| Driver Seat Heating | — | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | — | Multi-level |
Rearseats
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.6 in. | 39.7 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 39.8 in. | 37.4 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 53.6 in. | 56.6 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 52.1 in. | — |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | — |
| Wheel Size | 17 x 7.0 in | 18 x 8.0 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | P225/65R17 | 235/60R18 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Material | — | Alloy |
Suspension
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | — |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | — | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Hybrid Component Warranty | — | 6 yr./ 62000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda CX-50 and 2025 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class.
How much more power does the Mercedes GLC-Class have over the Mazda CX-50?
The 2025 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class produces 255 horsepower, which is a notable 68 hp more than the 2025 Mazda CX-50's 187 horsepower. This power difference should result in quicker acceleration times for the Mercedes.
Does the size difference between these two crossovers matter for parking?
They are almost identical in length at 185.8 inches (CX-50) and 185.7 inches (GLC-Class), meaning maneuverability in tight spots should be comparable. However, the GLC-Class is slightly taller at 64.6 inches versus 63.5 inches for the Mazda.
Is the higher cost of the GLC-Class worth it for fuel economy?
The fuel economy is nearly identical, with the CX-50 achieving 28 MPG combined and the GLC-Class netting 27 MPG combined. However, the CX-50 uses regular unleaded, whereas the GLC requires more expensive premium fuel, making the Mazda cheaper to run overall.
Which vehicle offers better practical cargo space?
The 2025 Mazda CX-50 is significantly better for hauling gear, offering 31.4 cubic feet of cargo capacity. The 2025 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class trails substantially with only 21.9 cubic feet available behind the rear seats.
What is the key drivetrain difference between the two models?
The 2025 Mazda CX-50 comes standard with all-wheel drive and uses a 6-speed automatic transmission. Conversely, the standard 2025 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class utilizes a rear-wheel drive setup paired with a modern 9-speed automatic transmission.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool