2025 Mazda CX-30 vs 2026 Nissan Rogue
Comparison Overview
The most significant numerical divergence between the 2025 Mazda CX-30 and the 2026 Nissan Rogue is the $3,895 difference in starting MSRP, with the CX-30 priced at $25,195 versus the Rogue’s $29,090. Dimensionally, the Rogue is substantially larger, measuring 183.0 inches long compared to the CX-30’s 173.0 inches, translating directly to a 56% advantage in cargo volume, offering 31.6 cu ft versus 20.2 cu ft. Performance metrics show the Rogue leading in power with 201 hp and 225 lb-ft of torque, while the CX-30 produces 191 hp and 186 lb-ft. However, the CX-30 exhibits superior fuel efficiency when comparing baseline FWD models (assuming base configurations for direct comparison, though provided specs list CX-30 as AWD and Rogue as FWD), achieving 29 combined MPG against the Rogue's 32 combined MPG (if comparing the provided specs, the CX-30 falls behind at 29 combined MPG). The CX-30 utilizes a traditional 6-speed automatic transmission, whereas the Rogue employs a CVT.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2026 Nissan Rogue
The 2026 Nissan Rogue offers superior combined fuel economy at 32 MPG compared to the Mazda CX-30's 29 MPG, reducing running costs.
2026 Nissan Rogue
With 31.6 cu ft of cargo capacity, the 2026 Nissan Rogue provides 11.4 cu ft more space than the CX-30 for hauling passengers and gear.
2026 Nissan Rogue
The 2026 Nissan Rogue generates greater peak output with 201 horsepower and 225 lb-ft of torque compared to the CX-30's 191 hp and 186 lb-ft.
2025 Mazda CX-30
The 2025 Mazda CX-30 is $3,895 less expensive while still offering 191 horsepower and standard all-wheel drive.
Choose the Mazda CX-30 if...
- Budget consciousness is paramount, as the MSRP of $25,195 is significantly lower than Car 2.
- A smaller footprint is preferred for urban parking, given its 173.0-inch length.
- A traditional 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission is desired over a CVT.
Choose the Nissan Rogue if...
- Maximum utility is required, highlighted by 31.6 cu ft of standard cargo space.
- Greater overall power is sought, leveraging the 201 hp engine output.
- Superior efficiency is a priority, evidenced by the 36 MPG highway rating.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Mazda CX-30 | Nissan Rogue |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 173.0" | 183.0" |
| Width | 70.7" | 72.4" |
| Height | 61.7" | 66.5" |
| Wheelbase | 104.4" | 106.5" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | — |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | — |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cross Traffic Alert | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.5 L | 1.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 3 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 191 hp @ 6000 rpm | 201 hp @ 5600 rpm |
| Torque | 186 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 225 lb-ft @ 2800 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 12 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cylinder Deactivation | ✓ | — |
Drive Train
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | continuously variable-speed automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | front wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 26/33 MPG | 29/36 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 29 MPG | 32 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 330.2/419.1 mi. | 420.5/522.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 12.7 gal. | 14.5 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | — | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | — | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 8.8 in | 8.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 4 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | — | ✓ |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 1 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 38.1 in. | 41.1 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.7 in. | 41.5 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 55.6 in. | 57.1 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 54.6 in. | 54.1 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
Rearseats
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.3 in. | 39.2 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 36.3 in. | 38.5 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 53.6 in. | 55.9 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 53.2 in. | 53.4 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | ✓ | ✓ |
| Folding Rear Seat Feature | — | ✓ |
| Pass-Thru Center Armrest | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | — |
| Wheel Size | 16 x 6.5 in | 17 x 7.5 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 215/65R16 | 235/65R17 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Material | — | Alloy |
Suspension
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | — |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | — | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda CX-30 and 2026 Nissan Rogue.
What is the primary difference in driving dynamics between these two crossovers?
The CX-30 emphasizes sportiness with its 6-speed automatic transmission and slightly lower curb weight (implied by size), contrasting with the Rogue's focus on efficiency via its CVT and larger size. The Rogue also has a higher ride height (66.5 inches vs. 61.7 inches).
How much more passenger/cargo room does the 2026 Nissan Rogue offer over the 2025 Mazda CX-30?
The Rogue provides a substantial advantage in storage, boasting 31.6 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the CX-30’s 20.2 cu ft, a difference of 11.4 cubic feet.
Which vehicle delivers better fuel economy based on the provided specifications?
The 2026 Nissan Rogue achieves a combined 32 MPG (29 city/36 highway), marginally bettering the 2025 Mazda CX-30’s 29 MPG combined (26 city/33 highway), despite the Rogue having higher power figures.
Is the standard drivetrain setup better for low-traction conditions?
The specifications list the 2025 Mazda CX-30 as standard with All-Wheel Drive, while the 2026 Nissan Rogue lists Front Wheel Drive, suggesting the CX-30 has an inherent advantage in snowy or loose-surface grip.
Considering the performance specs, is the Rogue’s higher MSRP justified?
The $3,895 price increase for the Rogue aligns with its superior horsepower (201 vs. 191) and torque (225 vs. 186 lb-ft), alongside substantially greater cargo capacity.
Which car is physically smaller and easier to maneuver in tight city environments?
The 2025 Mazda CX-30 is the physically smaller vehicle across all dimensions, measuring 173.0 inches in length and 70.7 inches in width, making it easier to park than the Rogue.
More Budget SUVs Under $30,000
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool