2025 Mazda CX-30 vs 2025 Nissan Rogue

Mazda CX-30

$25,195 ยท Crossover

vs
Nissan Rogue

$28,590 ยท Crossover

Comparison Overview

The most significant numerical disparity between the 2025 Mazda CX-30 and the 2025 Nissan Rogue is the $3,395 MSRP difference, starting at $25,195 for the Mazda versus $28,590 for the Nissan. Fuel economy also shows a substantial gap, with the Rogue achieving 33 combined MPG compared to the CX-30's 29 combined MPG, translating to 37 highway MPG for the Rogue versus 33 for the Mazda. Performance favors the Rogue, delivering 201 horsepower and 225 lb-ft of torque, surpassing the CX-30's 191 hp and 186 lb-ft. Furthermore, the Rogue offers 31.6 cubic feet of cargo capacity, significantly more than the CX-30's 20.2 cubic feet. While both vehicles use regular unleaded fuel and feature automatic transmissions, the CX-30's dimensions (173.0 inches long) position it as the smaller crossover relative to the 183.0-inch Rogue.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

๐Ÿš— Best for Commuters

2025 Nissan Rogue

The 2025 Nissan Rogue provides superior fuel efficiency, achieving 33 combined MPG versus the CX-30's 29 combined MPG.

๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ‘งโ€๐Ÿ‘ฆ Best for Families

2025 Nissan Rogue

The Rogue clearly wins for families by offering substantially more utility with 31.6 cu ft of cargo space compared to the CX-30's 20.2 cu ft.

๐ŸŽ๏ธ Best for Enthusiasts

2025 Nissan Rogue

The 2025 Rogue appeals more to performance seekers due to its higher output of 201 horsepower and 225 lb-ft of torque.

๐Ÿ’ฐ Best Value

2025 Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 is the better value proposition, starting $3,395 less while still providing a respectable 191 horsepower.

Choose the Mazda CX-30 if...

  • Budget is the primary concern, as the MSRP starts $3,395 lower at $25,195.
  • A more compact footprint is desired, given the CX-30's shorter length of 173.0 inches.
  • The driver prioritizes a standard 6-speed automatic transmission over a CVT.

Choose the Nissan Rogue if...

  • Maximum utility is needed, evidenced by 31.6 cu ft of cargo capacity versus 20.2 cu ft.
  • Maximum power output is preferred, with the Rogue offering 201 hp and 225 lb-ft of torque.
  • Best overall fuel economy is sought, with the Rogue achieving 33 combined MPG.

Key Dimensions

Dimension Mazda CX-30 Nissan Rogue
Length 173.0" 183.0"
Width 70.7" 72.4"
Height 61.7" 66.5"
Wheelbase 104.4" 106.5"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Mazda Nissan
Blind Spot Monitor โœ“ โœ“
Lane Departure Warning โœ“ โœ“
Lane Keeping Assist System โœ“ โ€”
Rear Cross Traffic Alert โœ“ โœ“
Driver Attention Alert โœ“ โœ“
Pre-Collision Safety System โœ“ โœ“
Post-Collision Safety System โœ“ โ€”
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Front Head Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Rear Head Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation โœ“ โœ“
Electronic Stability Control โœ“ โœ“
Traction Control System โœ“ โœ“
LATCH System โœ“ โœ“
Rear Door Child Safety Locks โœ“ โœ“
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes โœ“ โœ“
Rear Solid Disc Brakes โœ“ โ€”
Brake Assist โœ“ โœ“
Tire Pressure Monitoring System โœ“ โœ“
Automatic Headlights โœ“ โœ“
Headlight Delay-Off โœ“ โœ“
LED Headlights โœ“ โœ“
Daytime Running Lights โœ“ โœ“
Front Headrests 2 2
Front Height Adjustable Headrests โœ“ โœ“
Rear Headrests 3 3
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests โœ“ โœ“
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt โœ“ โœ“
Engine Immobilizer โœ“ โœ“
Front Cross Traffic Alert โ€” โœ“
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes โ€” โœ“
Engine
Feature Mazda Nissan
Base Engine Displacement 2.5 L 1.5 L
Number of Cylinders inline 4 inline 3
Base Engine Type gas gas
Horsepower 191 hp @ 6000 rpm 201 hp @ 5600 rpm
Torque 186 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm 225 lb-ft @ 2800 rpm
Number of Valves 16 12
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type โœ“ โœ“
Cylinder Deactivation โœ“ โ€”
Drive Train
Feature Mazda Nissan
Transmission Type 6-speed shiftable automatic continuously variable-speed automatic
Drivetrain Type all wheel drive front wheel drive
Fuel
Feature Mazda Nissan
Fuel Type regular unleaded regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 26/33 MPG 30/37 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 29 MPG 33 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 330.2/419.1 mi. 435.0/536.5 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 12.7 gal. 14.5 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Mazda Nissan
Push Button Start โœ“ โœ“
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Electric Power Steering โœ“ โœ“
Rear View Camera โœ“ โœ“
Adaptive Cruise Control โœ“ โ€”
Front Cupholders โœ“ โœ“
Rear Cupholders โœ“ โœ“
Front Door Pockets โœ“ โœ“
Rear Door Pockets โœ“ โœ“
Single Zone Climate Control โœ“ โœ“
Dual Vanity Mirrors โœ“ โ€”
Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel โ€” โœ“
Rear Parking Sensors โ€” โœ“
Cruise Control โ€” โœ“
Overhead Console with Storage โ€” โœ“
Front Seatback Storage โ€” โœ“
Rear Ventilation Ducts โ€” โœ“
Interior Air Filtration โ€” โœ“
In Car Entertainment
Feature Mazda Nissan
Infotainment Display 8.8 in 8.0 in
AM/FM Stereo โœ“ โœ“
Speaker System 6 4
Android Auto (Wired) โœ“ โœ“
Apple CarPlay (Wired) โœ“ โœ“
USB Port โœ“ โœ“
USB Port with External Media Control โœ“ โœ“
Satellite Radio โ€” โœ“
Speed Sensitive Volume Control โ€” โœ“
Power Feature
Feature Mazda Nissan
One-Touch Power Windows 4 1
Remote Keyless Entry โœ“ โœ“
Heated Mirrors โœ“ โœ“
Frontseats
Feature Mazda Nissan
Front Head Room 38.1 in. 41.1 in.
Front Leg Room 41.7 in. 41.5 in.
Front Shoulder Room 55.6 in. 57.1 in.
Front Hip Room 54.6 in. 54.1 in.
Seat Material: Cloth โœ“ โœ“
Front Seat Type: Bucket โœ“ โœ“
Driver Seat Manual Adjustments 6-way 6-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment โœ“ โœ“
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments 4-way 4-way
Rearseats
Feature Mazda Nissan
Rear Head Room 38.3 in. 39.2 in.
Rear Leg Room 36.3 in. 38.5 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 53.6 in. 55.9 in.
Rear Hip Room 53.2 in. 53.4 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback โœ“ โœ“
Reclining Rear Seats โœ“ โœ“
Folding Rear Seat Feature โ€” โœ“
Pass-Thru Center Armrest โ€” โœ“
Tires and Wheels
Feature Mazda Nissan
Wheel Finish Painted Alloy โ€”
Wheel Size 16 x 6.5 in 17 x 7.5 in
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size 215/65R16 P235/65R17
Spare Tire Type Temporary Temporary
Spare Tire Location Inside Mounted Inside Mounted
Wheel Material โ€” Alloy
Suspension
Feature Mazda Nissan
Front Suspension Type Independent โ€”
Stabilizer Bar โœ“ โ€”
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension โ€” โœ“
Front Stabilizer Bar โ€” โœ“
Rear Stabilizer Bar โ€” โœ“
Warranty
Feature Mazda Nissan
Basic Warranty 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 5 yr./ unlimited mi. 5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance โ€” 2 yr./ 24000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda CX-30 and 2025 Nissan Rogue.

What is the primary mechanical difference in the powertrains?

The 2025 Nissan Rogue generates 201 horsepower and 225 lb-ft of torque, outperforming the 2025 Mazda CX-30 which produces 191 hp and 186 lb-ft of torque. The Rogue also utilizes a continuously variable-speed automatic transmission, whereas the CX-30 uses a traditional 6-speed shiftable automatic.

How much more cargo space does the Rogue offer?

The Nissan Rogue provides 31.6 cubic feet of cargo capacity. This is a significant advantage over the Mazda CX-30, which only offers 20.2 cubic feet for storage.

Which vehicle is dimensionally larger?

The 2025 Nissan Rogue is larger overall; it measures 183.0 inches in length and 66.5 inches in height, compared to the CX-30's length of 173.0 inches and height of 61.7 inches.

Is the lower MPG rating of the CX-30 offset by its lower price?

The CX-30 is $3,395 less expensive but sacrifices 4 combined MPG (29 MPG vs. 33 MPG). Buyers must calculate if the fuel savings from the Rogue over several years outweigh the initial lower purchase price of the Mazda.

Do both vehicles require premium gasoline?

No, both the 2025 Mazda CX-30 and the 2025 Nissan Rogue specify regular unleaded fuel, minimizing operational costs related to fuel grade selection.

How does the standard drivetrain differ between these models?

The comparison data indicates the 2025 Mazda CX-30 comes standard with all-wheel drive, while the standard configuration for the 2025 Nissan Rogue is front-wheel drive.

More Budget SUVs Under $30,000

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool