2025 Mazda CX-30 vs 2025 Nissan Kicks
Comparison Overview
The 2025 Mazda CX-30 is the choice for driving enjoyment, packing a potent 191 horsepower and 186 lb-ft of torque, delivering satisfying performance from its standard all-wheel-drive system. Conversely, the 2025 Nissan Kicks charms budget-conscious buyers with its aggressive starting price of $21,830, significantly undercutting the Mazda's $25,195 MSRP. While the CX-30 offers a sportier edge with 50 more horsepower, the Kicks maximizes utility, boasting a substantial 30 cubic feet of cargo capacity compared to the Mazda's 20.2 cubic feet. Fuel efficiency leans slightly toward the Kicks with a 31 MPG combined rating versus the CX-30's 29 MPG combined. Ultimately, the contest pits Mazda's enthusiast appeal and spirited 6-speed automatic transmission against Nissan's superior practicality and significant cost savings.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Nissan Kicks
The Nissan Kicks wins for commuters due to its superior fuel economy, achieving 31 MPG combined compared to the CX-30's 29 MPG combined.
2025 Nissan Kicks
Families will favor the Kicks for its substantially larger 30 cubic feet of cargo capacity, beating the CX-30's 20.2 cubic feet.
2025 Mazda CX-30
The Mazda CX-30 is the clear enthusiast pick, boasting 191 horsepower and standard all-wheel drive against the Kicks' 141 horsepower.
2025 Nissan Kicks
The Kicks offers superior value by saving buyers $3,365 in initial MSRP while still providing good utility.
Choose the Mazda CX-30 if...
- You prioritize spirited driving dynamics, benefiting from 191 horsepower.
- You require standard all-wheel drive capability for varying conditions.
- You prefer the direct feel of a 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission over a CVT.
Choose the Nissan Kicks if...
- Your primary concern is maximizing storage space with 30 cubic feet of cargo.
- You need the absolute lowest initial purchase price, saving $3,365 over the CX-30.
- You prioritize fuel efficiency, as the Kicks achieves 35 highway MPG.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Mazda CX-30 | Nissan Kicks |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 173.0" | 171.9" |
| Width | 70.7" | 70.9" |
| Height | 61.7" | 64.2" |
| Wheelbase | 104.4" | 104.6" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | โ | โ |
| Lane Departure Warning | โ | โ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | โ | โ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | โ | โ |
| Driver Attention Alert | โ | โ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | โ | โ |
| Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags | โ | โ |
| Front Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Rear Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | โ | โ |
| Electronic Stability Control | โ | โ |
| Traction Control System | โ | โ |
| LATCH System | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | โ | โ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Brake Assist | โ | โ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | โ | โ |
| Automatic Headlights | โ | โ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | โ | โ |
| LED Headlights | โ | โ |
| Daytime Running Lights | โ | โ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | โ | โ |
| Engine Immobilizer | โ | โ |
| Rear Fixed Headrests | โ | โ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | โ | โ |
Engine
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.5 L | 2.0 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 191 hp @ 6000 rpm | 141 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 186 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 140 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | โ | โ |
| Cylinder Deactivation | โ | โ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | continuously variable-speed automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | front wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 26/33 MPG | 28/35 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 29 MPG | 31 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 330.2/419.1 mi. | 333.2/416.5 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 12.7 gal. | 11.9 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | โ | โ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Electric Power Steering | โ | โ |
| Rear View Camera | โ | โ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | โ | โ |
| Front Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Rear Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Front Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | โ | โ |
| Cruise Control | โ | โ |
| Front Seatback Storage | โ | โ |
| Interior Air Filtration | โ | โ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 8.8 in | 7.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | โ | โ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 4 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | โ | โ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | โ | โ |
| USB Port | โ | โ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | โ | โ |
| Auxiliary Audio Input | โ | โ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 2 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | โ | โ |
| Heated Mirrors | โ | โ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 38.1 in. | 39.7 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.7 in. | 42.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 55.6 in. | 54.7 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 54.6 in. | 52.4 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | โ | โ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | โ | โ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | โ | โ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
Rearseats
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.3 in. | 38.5 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 36.3 in. | 34.5 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 53.6 in. | 54.7 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 53.2 in. | 50.1 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | โ | โ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | โ | โ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | โ |
| Wheel Size | 16 x 6.5 in | 16 x 6.5 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 215/65R16 | 215/60R16 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | โ |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | โ |
| Wheel Material | โ | Steel |
| Wheel Cover Type | โ | Full |
Suspension
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | Independent |
| Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
Warranty
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | โ | 2 yr./ 24000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda CX-30 and 2025 Nissan Kicks.
What is the main mechanical difference between the 2025 Mazda CX-30 and the 2025 Nissan Kicks?
The most significant difference lies in power output; the CX-30 delivers 191 horsepower, while the Kicks produces 141 horsepower. Additionally, the CX-30 features standard all-wheel drive and a 6-speed automatic, whereas the Kicks uses front-wheel drive and a continuously variable transmission.
How much more cargo space does the Kicks offer compared to the CX-30?
The 2025 Nissan Kicks is substantially more cargo-friendly, offering 30 cubic feet of capacity. This significantly surpasses the 2025 Mazda CX-30, which provides only 20.2 cubic feet for luggage.
Is the CX-30 significantly more expensive than the Kicks?
Yes, the Mazda CX-30 has an MSRP starting at $25,195, making it $3,365 more expensive than the Nissan Kicks, which starts at $21,830.
Which crossover is more fuel-efficient for highway commuting?
The Nissan Kicks holds the efficiency crown, achieving an EPA-estimated 35 MPG on the highway compared to the CX-30's 33 MPG highway rating.
Do either of these vehicles require premium fuel?
No, both the 2025 Mazda CX-30 and the 2025 Nissan Kicks are specified to run on regular unleaded fuel, helping keep running costs lower for both models.
How do the physical dimensions compare between these two compact crossovers?
The vehicles are similar in length (173.0 inches for Mazda vs. 171.9 inches for Nissan), but the Kicks is slightly taller at 64.2 inches compared to the CX-30's 61.7 inches.
More Budget SUVs Under $30,000
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool