2025 Mazda 3 vs 2025 Nissan Sentra
Comparison Overview
The 2025 Mazda 3 excites with its premium feel and spirited 191 hp Skyactiv-G engine, offering a dynamic drive that belies its $24,150 starting price. Contrastingly, the 2025 Nissan Sentra captivates value-focused buyers with its impressive fuel economy, achieving 34 MPG combined from its 149 hp engine, all starting at an accessible $21,590. Performance is where the Mazda pulls ahead, boasting a significant 42 hp advantage, which translates to sharper acceleration than the Sentra’s CVT setup. While the Sentra offers marginally more cargo space at 14.3 cu ft compared to the Mazda’s 13.2 cu ft, the Mazda’s 27/37 MPG city/highway still offers respectable efficiency for its power output. Ultimately, this comparison pits Mazda’s focused driving dynamics against Nissan’s pragmatic efficiency and lower initial cost.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Nissan Sentra
The Nissan Sentra wins for daily commuting due to its superior combined fuel economy of 34 MPG.
2025 Nissan Sentra
The Sentra offers slightly better practicality with a larger 14.3 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the Mazda 3's 13.2 cu ft.
2025 Mazda 3
The Mazda 3 delivers a much more engaging drive, packing 191 hp and 186 lb-ft of torque versus the Sentra's 149 hp.
2025 Nissan Sentra
The Nissan Sentra provides a substantially lower entry price point at $21,590 compared to the Mazda 3's $24,150 MSRP.
Choose the Mazda 3 if...
- You prioritize driving engagement, benefiting from 191 horsepower.
- You prefer the responsiveness of a 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission.
- You desire a premium aesthetic reflected in its higher MSRP but backed by better performance figures.
Choose the Nissan Sentra if...
- Your main focus is maximizing fuel savings, achieving 40 MPG on the highway.
- You need the absolute lowest starting price at just $21,590.
- You need slightly more utility, evidenced by 14.3 cu ft of cargo volume.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Mazda 3 | Nissan Sentra |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 183.5" | 182.7" |
| Width | 70.7" | 71.5" |
| Height | 56.9" | 56.9" |
| Wheelbase | 107.3" | 106.6" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | — |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | — |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | — |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | — |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | — |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Drum Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | — | ✓ |
| Rear Fixed Headrests | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.5 L | 2.0 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 191 hp @ 6000 rpm | 149 hp @ 6400 rpm |
| Torque | 186 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 146 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cylinder Deactivation | ✓ | — |
Drive Train
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | continuously variable-speed automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | front wheel drive | front wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 27/37 MPG | 30/40 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 31 MPG | 34 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 356.4/488.4 mi. | 372.0/496.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 13.2 gal. | 12.4 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 8.8 in | 7.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 4 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | — | ✓ |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 1 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 38.0 in. | 38.9 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 42.3 in. | 44.0 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 55.7 in. | 56.4 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 54.6 in. | 53.5 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
Rearseats
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 37.3 in. | 36.7 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 35.1 in. | 34.7 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 53.5 in. | 54.5 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 50.9 in. | 53.3 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Material | Alloy | Steel |
| Wheel Size | 16 x 6.5 in | 16 x 6.5 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 205/60R16 | P205/60R H |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Cover Type | — | Full |
Suspension
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | — |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | — | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Mazda | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | — | 2 yr./ 24000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Mazda 3 and 2025 Nissan Sentra.
How significant is the 42 horsepower difference between the two sedans?
The 42 hp gap is substantial; the Mazda 3 produces 191 hp while the Sentra has 149 hp. This means the Mazda will feel significantly quicker during passing maneuvers and on highway ramps, offsetting the Sentra's greater fuel efficiency.
Which car is better for long highway commutes based on the MPG ratings?
The Nissan Sentra is superior for high-mileage commuters, achieving 40 MPG highway compared to the Mazda 3’s 37 MPG highway. This 3 MPG advantage translates directly into fewer fuel stops over the year.
Does the Mazda 3's higher price include better handling hardware?
While specific suspension details are not listed, the Mazda 3's higher MSRP of $24,150 often reflects its tuning philosophy focused on driving dynamics. Enthusiasts will appreciate the Mazda’s commitment to feeling more connected to the road than the Sentra’s CVT setup.
Is the cargo capacity difference a major deciding factor?
The difference is minor but present: the Sentra offers 14.3 cu ft versus the Mazda 3's 13.2 cu ft. For families packing for short trips, this extra 1.1 cu ft in the Sentra might make packing slightly easier.
Which vehicle uses a traditional geared automatic transmission?
The 2025 Mazda 3 is equipped with a traditional 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission. Conversely, the 2025 Nissan Sentra utilizes a continuously variable-speed automatic (CVT).
Are both vehicles compatible with regular unleaded fuel?
Yes, both the 2025 Mazda 3 and the 2025 Nissan Sentra are designed to run efficiently on regular unleaded gasoline, keeping running costs predictable for both models.
More Budget Sedans Under $30,000
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool