2025 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs 2026 Mazda CX-70

$49,900 · Crossover

$42,250 · Crossover

Comparison Overview

The 2025 Range Rover Evoque captivates with its sculpted British elegance and premium AWD demeanor, appealing to those prioritizing brand cachet and compact agility. Conversely, the formidable 2026 Mazda CX-70 bursts onto the scene as a power-forward powerhouse, boasting 280 hp and a massive 332 lb-ft of torque. While the Evoque leans into luxury with an MSRP of $49,900, the CX-70 undercuts it significantly at $42,250, presenting a compelling value proposition. Performance favors Mazda, as the CX-70 delivers 34 more horsepower than the Evoque’s 246 hp output. Economically, the Mazda also wins the efficiency contest with a combined 25 MPG compared to the Evoque's 22 MPG. However, the Evoque’s smaller footprint (172.1 inches long) offers better city maneuverability than the substantial 200.8-inch long CX-70, highlighting a core difference in their mission: refined style versus outright utility and power.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

🚗 Best for Commuters

2025 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

The Range Rover Evoque's shorter length of 172.1 inches makes it inherently easier to navigate and park in dense urban commuting environments.

👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Best for Families

2026 Mazda CX-70

The 2026 Mazda CX-70 offers significantly superior utility with 39.6 cu ft of cargo capacity versus the Evoque's 21.6 cu ft.

🏎️ Best for Enthusiasts

2026 Mazda CX-70

The CX-70 provides a thrilling performance advantage with 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque, substantially eclipsing the Evoque's 246 hp and 269 lb-ft.

💰 Best Value

2026 Mazda CX-70

The Mazda CX-70 costs $7,650 less, offers better fuel economy at 25 combined MPG, and provides more power.

Choose the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque if...

You absolutely require the prestige and exclusive design language associated with the Range Rover brand.
Your driving primarily occurs in tight urban centers where the Evoque's 172.1-inch length aids maneuverability.
You prefer the slightly better Highway MPG rating of 27 MPG, despite requiring premium fuel.

Choose the Mazda CX-70 if...

Maximum interior space is critical, given the massive 39.6 cu ft cargo capacity available.
You demand outright acceleration driven by the superior 280 hp engine output.
Saving $7,650 on the initial purchase price is a major deciding factor.

Key Dimensions

Dimension	Land Rover Range Rover Evoque	Mazda CX-70
Length	172.1"	200.8"
Width	-	-
Height	64.9"	68.2"
Wheelbase	105.6"	122.8"

Features Comparison

Safety

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Blind Spot Monitor	✓	✓
Lane Keeping Assist System	✓	✓
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	✓	✓
Driver Attention Alert	✓	✓
Pre-Collision Safety System	✓	✓
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags	✓	✓
Front Head Airbags	✓	✓
Rear Head Airbags	✓	✓
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation	✓	✓
Electronic Stability Control	✓	✓
Traction Control System	✓	✓
LATCH System	✓	✓
Rear Door Child Safety Locks	✓	✓
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS)	4-Wheel	4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes	✓	✓
Rear Solid Disc Brakes	✓	—
Brake Preparation System	✓	—
Brake Assist	✓	—
Tire Pressure Monitoring System	✓	✓
Automatic Headlights	✓	✓
Headlight Delay-Off	✓	✓
LED Headlights	✓	✓
Self-Leveling Headlights	✓	✓
Daytime Running Lights	✓	✓
Front Fog Lights	✓	—
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors	✓	✓
Front Headrests	2	2
Front Height Adjustable Headrests	✓	✓
Rear Headrests	3	3
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt	✓	✓
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote)	✓	—
Engine Immobilizer	✓	✓
Lane Departure Warning	—	✓
Post-Collision Safety System	—	✓
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes	—	✓
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests	—	✓

Engine

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Base Engine Displacement	2.0 L	3.3 L
Number of Cylinders	inline 4	inline 6
Base Engine Type	gas	mild hybrid
Horsepower	246 hp @ 5500 rpm	280 hp @ 5000 rpm
Torque	269 lb-ft @ 1300 rpm	332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm
Number of Valves	16	24
Camshaft Type	Double overhead cam (DOHC)	Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing	Variable	Variable
Fuel Injection Type	✓	✓

Drive Train

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Transmission Type	9-speed shiftable automatic	8-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type	all wheel drive	all wheel drive
Hill Descent Control	✓	✓
Center Differential Type	—	Limited Slip

Fuel

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Fuel Type	premium unleaded (recommended)	regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway)	20/27 MPG	24/28 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined)	22 MPG	25 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway)	354.0/477.9 mi.	444.0/518.0 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity	17.7 gal.	18.5 gal.

Comfort & Convenience

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Push Button Start	✓	✓
Power Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel	✓	—
Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Electric Power Steering	✓	✓
Rear View Camera	✓	✓
Front Parking Sensors	✓	✓
Rear Parking Sensors	✓	✓
Wireless Charging Pad	✓	✓
Adaptive Cruise Control	✓	✓
Universal Remote Transmitter	✓	—
Front Cupholders	✓	✓
Rear Cupholders	✓	✓
Front Door Pockets	✓	✓
Rear Door Pockets	✓	✓
Overhead Console with Storage	✓	✓
Front Seatback Storage	✓	✓
Leather Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Heated Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Dual Zone Climate Control	✓	—
Rear Ventilation Ducts	✓	—
Dual Vanity Mirrors	✓	✓
Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror	✓	—
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors	✓	✓
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel	—	✓
Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control	—	✓
Interior Air Filtration	—	✓
Three Zone Climate Control	—	✓

In Car Entertainment

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Infotainment Display	11.4 in	12.3 in
AM/FM Stereo	✓	✓
Meridian Speakers	✓	—
Stereo Power	400W	—
Speaker System	12	8
Subwoofer Count	1	—
Android Auto (Wireless)	✓	✓
Apple CarPlay (Wireless)	✓	✓
USB Port	✓	✓
Satellite Radio	✓	—
Satellite Radio Trial Period	3 months	—
Speed Sensitive Volume Control	✓	✓
USB Port with External Media Control	—	✓

Power Feature

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
One-Touch Power Windows	4	4
Moonroof Type	1st Row Power Glass	1st Row Power Glass
Keyless Entry	✓	✓
Heated Mirrors	✓	✓

Frontseats

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Front Head Room	37.4 in.	39.7 in.
Front Leg Room	40.0 in.	41.7 in.
Front Shoulder Room	56.6 in.	59.2 in.
Seat Material: Leather	✓	✓
Front Seat Type: Bucket	✓	✓
Driver Seat Power Adjustments	8-way	8-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment	✓	✓
Driver Seat Lumbar Support	Power	Power
Driver Seat Memory Settings	3	2
Passenger Seat Power Adjustments	6-way	8-way
Passenger Seat Height Adjustment	✓	✓
Passenger Seat Lumbar Support	Power	—
Driver Seat Heating	Multi-level	Multi-level
Passenger Seat Heating	Multi-level	Multi-level
Front Hip Room	—	56.2 in.
Driver Seat Ventilation	—	✓
Passenger Seat Ventilation	—	✓

Rearseats

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Rear Head Room	38.1 in.	39.3 in.
Rear Leg Room	34.0 in.	39.4 in.
Rear Shoulder Room	55.4 in.	58.1 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback	✓	✓
Folding Center Armrest	✓	✓
Rear Hip Room	—	55.5 in.
Reclining Rear Seats	—	✓
Heated Rear Seats (Multi-Level)	—	✓

Tires and Wheels

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Wheel Material	Alloy	—
Wheel Size	18 x 8.0 in	21 x 9.5 in.
Tire Type	All Season	All Season
Tire Size	R18	275/45R21
Spare Tire Type	Temporary	Temporary
Spare Tire Location	Inside Mounted	Inside Mounted
Wheel Finish	—	Painted Alloy

Suspension

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension	✓	✓
Front Stabilizer Bar	✓	✓
Rear Stabilizer Bar	✓	✓

Warranty

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Basic Warranty	4 yr./ 50000 mi.	3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty	4 yr./ 50000 mi.	5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty	6 yr./ unlimited mi.	5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance	4 yr./ 50000 mi.	3 yr./ 36000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2026 Mazda CX-70.

How much more practical is the cargo space in the CX-70 compared to the Evoque?

The 2026 Mazda CX-70 provides a substantial advantage in hauling gear, offering 39.6 cubic feet of cargo volume. This dwarfs the 2025 Range Rover Evoque, which only furnishes 21.6 cubic feet of space behind the rear seats.

Is the Range Rover Evoque’s smaller size worth the drop in horsepower for city driving?

While the Evoque is shorter at 172.1 inches, making parallel parking easier, the CX-70's lower fuel consumption (24/28 MPG vs. 20/27 MPG) suggests efficiency remains competitive despite its larger frame.

Which vehicle uses less expensive fuel and offers better real-world fuel economy?

The Mazda CX-70 is superior both in cost and efficiency, as it runs on regular unleaded fuel and achieves 25 combined MPG. The Evoque requires recommended premium fuel and only manages 22 combined MPG.

If performance is paramount, what is the power difference between these two AWD crossovers?

The Mazda CX-70 offers a decisive performance edge with 280 horsepower and 332 lb-ft of torque, meaning it is significantly more potent than the Evoque’s 246 hp and 269 lb-ft.

What is the cost differential between the base models of the Evoque and the CX-70?

The 2025 Range Rover Evoque starts at $49,900 MSRP, creating a $7,650 price gap when compared to the 2026 Mazda CX-70 starting at $42,250.

Are the transmissions identical, or does one offer more gear control?

Both use shiftable automatics, but the Evoque utilizes a 9-speed unit, theoretically offering smoother lower-speed transitions, whereas the CX-70 employs an 8-speed automatic.