2025 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs 2025 Volvo XC60
Comparison Overview
Deciding between compact luxury crossovers often comes down to style versus sensibility, and the 2025 Range Rover Evoque ($49,900 MSRP) versus the 2025 Volvo XC60 ($47,050 MSRP) highlights this perfectly. The Evoque leans into tight city maneuvering with its shorter 172.1-inch length, though it demands a premium for that footprint. The XC60 is the clear efficiency winner, achieving 26 MPG combined compared to the Evoque's 22 MPG combinedβa meaningful 4 MPG gap that translates to fewer trips to the pump. While both offer comparable power, with the Evoque at 246 hp and the XC60 slightly ahead at 247 hp, the Volvo's smaller appetite for premium fuel and better overall economy make it the more pragmatic choice for daily driving. Furthermore, the XC60 offers superior physical space, evident in its greater overall dimensions and likely offering more room than the Evoque's 21.6 cu ft of cargo.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Volvo XC60
The Volvo XC60 wins for commuters due to its 4 MPG combined fuel economy advantage over the Evoque.
2025 Volvo XC60
The XC60 is the likely family choice because it is physically larger than the Evoque, suggesting more passenger and cargo accommodation.
2025 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Evoque edges out the enthusiast category by utilizing a 9-speed automatic transmission, offering potentially more dynamic shifting options than the XC60's 8-speed.
2025 Volvo XC60
The Volvo XC60 provides superior fuel economy and a lower starting MSRP of $47,050 compared to the Evoque's $49,900.
Choose the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque if...
- You frequently navigate tight urban environments where the Evoque's shorter 172.1-inch length is a significant advantage.
- You prefer the feel of a 9-speed shiftable automatic transmission over the XC60's 8-speed.
- You prioritize the iconic styling and brand cachet associated with the Range Rover Evoque, despite the higher initial cost.
Choose the Volvo XC60 if...
- Fuel efficiency is a top concern, as the XC60 offers a 4 MPG combined boost (26 MPG vs 22 MPG).
- You need slightly more power on paper, as the XC60 has 247 hp compared to the Evoque's 246 hp.
- You are looking for a better initial price point, with the XC60 starting at $47,050 versus $49,900 for the Evoque.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Volvo XC60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 172.1" | 185.4" |
| Width | - | 74.9" |
| Height | 64.9" | 65.2" |
| Wheelbase | 105.6" | 112.8" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Land Rover | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | β | β |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | β | β |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | β | β |
| Driver Attention Alert | β | β |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | β | β |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | β | β |
| Front Head Airbags | β | β |
| Rear Head Airbags | β | β |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | β | β |
| Electronic Stability Control | β | β |
| Traction Control System | β | β |
| LATCH System | β | β |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | β | β |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | β | β |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | β | β |
| Brake Preparation System | β | β |
| Brake Assist | β | β |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | β | β |
| Automatic Headlights | β | β |
| Headlight Delay-Off | β | β |
| LED Headlights | β | β |
| Self-Leveling Headlights | β | β |
| Daytime Running Lights | β | β |
| Front Fog Lights | β | β |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | β | β |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | β | β |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | β | β |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | β | β |
| Engine Immobilizer | β | β |
| Lane Departure Warning | β | β |
| Post-Collision Safety System | β | β |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | β | β |
| Adaptive Headlights | β | β |
| Cornering Lights | β | β |
| Front Fixed Headrests | β | β |
| Rear Folding Headrests | β | β |
Engine
| Feature | Land Rover | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.0 L | 2.0 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | mild hybrid |
| Horsepower | 246 hp @ 5500 rpm | 247 hp |
| Torque | 269 lb-ft @ 1300 rpm | 266 lb-ft |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | β | β |
Drive Train
| Feature | Land Rover | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 9-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| Hill Descent Control | β | β |
Fuel
| Feature | Land Rover | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | premium unleaded (recommended) | premium unleaded (recommended) |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 20/27 MPG | 23/30 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 22 MPG | 26 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 354.0/477.9 mi. | 432.4/564.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 17.7 gal. | 18.8 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Land Rover | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | β | β |
| Power Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Electric Power Steering | β | β |
| Rear View Camera | β | β |
| Front Parking Sensors | β | β |
| Rear Parking Sensors | β | β |
| Wireless Charging Pad | β | β |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | β | β |
| Universal Remote Transmitter | β | β |
| Front Cupholders | β | β |
| Rear Cupholders | β | β |
| Front Door Pockets | β | β |
| Rear Door Pockets | β | β |
| Overhead Console with Storage | β | β |
| Front Seatback Storage | β | β |
| Leather Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Heated Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | β | β |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | β | β |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | β | β |
| Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror | β | β |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | β | β |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Cruise Control | β | β |
| Simulated Alloy Trim on Steering Wheel | β | β |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Land Rover | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 11.4 in | 9.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | β | β |
| Meridian Speakers | β | β |
| Stereo Power | 400W | 220W |
| Speaker System | 12 | 10 |
| Subwoofer Count | 1 | β |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | β | β |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | β | β |
| USB Port | β | β |
| Satellite Radio | β | β |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | 3 months |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | β | β |
| Android Auto (Wired) | β | β |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | β | β |
| USB Port with External Media Control | β | β |
Power Feature
| Feature | Land Rover | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 4 |
| Moonroof Type | 1st Row Power Glass | 1st Row Power Glass |
| Keyless Entry | β | β |
| Heated Mirrors | β | β |
Frontseats
| Feature | Land Rover | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 37.4 in. | 38.0 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 40.0 in. | 41.5 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 56.6 in. | 58.2 in. |
| Seat Material: Leather | β | β |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | β | β |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | β | β |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | Power |
| Driver Seat Memory Settings | 3 | 2 |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | 6-way | 8-way |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | β | β |
| Passenger Seat Lumbar Support | Power | Power |
| Driver Seat Heating | Multi-level | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | Multi-level | Multi-level |
| Front Hip Room | β | 56.4 in. |
| Seat Material: Leatherette/Cloth | β | β |
Rearseats
| Feature | Land Rover | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.1 in. | 38.0 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 34.0 in. | 38.0 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 55.4 in. | 56.3 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | β | β |
| Folding Center Armrest | β | β |
| Rear Hip Room | β | 55.4 in. |
| Folding Rear Seat Feature | β | β |
| Pass-Thru Center Armrest | β | β |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Land Rover | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Material | Alloy | Alloy |
| Wheel Size | 18 x 8.0 in | 18 x 7.5 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | R18 | 235/60R18 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
Suspension
| Feature | Land Rover | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | β | β |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | β | β |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | β | β |
Warranty
| Feature | Land Rover | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 6 yr./ unlimited mi. | 12 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. | 4 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | β | 3 yr./ 30000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2025 Volvo XC60.
Is the fuel cost difference significant between the 2025 Evoque and the 2025 XC60?
Yes, the Volvo XC60 is rated for 26 MPG combined, which is 4 MPG better than the Range Rover Evoque's 22 MPG combined. Since both recommend premium fuel, this efficiency difference means the XC60 will cost noticeably less over the lifespan of ownership.
Which crossover is better for city parking and maneuvering?
The 2025 Range Rover Evoque is better suited for tight city maneuvers because it is significantly shorter in length at 172.1 inches. This compact footprint makes squeezing into smaller parking spots easier compared to the longer 2025 Volvo XC60.
Do the horsepower ratings reflect a real difference in performance?
The performance difference will be minimal; the XC60 offers 247 hp compared to the Evoqueβs 246 hp, which is functionally negligible for everyday driving. However, the Evoque does use a 9-speed transmission while the XC60 uses an 8-speed, which might subtly alter acceleration feel.
How much more cargo space does the Volvo XC60 offer?
While the exact cargo capacity for the XC60 isn't specified, its larger overall dimensions suggest more room than the Evoque's noted 21.6 cubic feet. For families needing maximum storage, the longer XC60 body style will likely translate to more usable space.
Are both vehicles significantly more expensive to run due to fuel type?
Both vehicles specify premium unleaded as recommended fuel, which will inherently lead to higher per-gallon costs than regular fuel cars. However, the XC60's 4 MPG higher combined rating offsets some of that premium cost impact for budget-conscious buyers.
How does the initial price tag compare for these two luxury SUVs?
The 2025 Volvo XC60 has a more accessible starting MSRP of $47,050. In contrast, the 2025 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque starts higher at $49,900, meaning you pay a premium of nearly $2,850 upfront for the Evoque model.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool