2025 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs 2025 Toyota 4Runner
Comparison Overview
The 2025 Range Rover Evoque captivates with its sleek, compact luxury aesthetic, delivering a refined urban drive supported by 246 hp. In contrast, the rugged 2025 Toyota 4Runner beckons with raw capability, boasting 278 hp and a massive 48.4 cu ft of cargo space, far surpassing the Evoque's 21.6 cu ft. While the Evoque feels instantly premium, it commands a significantly higher entry price of $49,900 compared to the 4Runner's $41,270, an $8,630 gap. Performance metrics are tightly clustered; both achieve a combined 22 MPG, but the 4Runner benefits from utilizing regular unleaded fuel versus the Evoque's recommended premium. The Evoque offers superior maneuverability at 172.1 inches long, while the 4Runner emphasizes brute hauling capacity and torque delivery.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Evoque's more compact dimensions (172.1 inches in length) make it significantly easier to navigate and park in dense urban commuting environments.
2025 Toyota 4Runner
The 4Runner offers nearly double the practical utility with a massive 48.4 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the Evoque's 21.6 cu ft.
2025 Toyota 4Runner
The 4Runner’s superior output of 278 hp and 317 lb-ft of torque provides a more visceral driving edge than the Evoque's 246 hp.
2025 Toyota 4Runner
The 4Runner offers significantly more horsepower (32 hp advantage) and vastly more space for $8,630 less MSRP.
Choose the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque if...
- You prioritize cutting-edge, modern crossover styling and a premium interior feel over maximum utility.
- Your driving primarily involves city commuting where the shorter length (172.1 inches) offers better maneuverability.
- You are comfortable paying the $49,900 MSRP for a vehicle that recommends premium unleaded fuel.
Choose the Toyota 4Runner if...
- You need extreme cargo flexibility, utilizing the class-leading 48.4 cu ft of hauling space.
- You want maximum power output, benefiting from the 278 hp engine running on standard regular unleaded fuel.
- Your budget demands saving $8,630 upfront while gaining more torque (317 lb-ft) than the competitor.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Toyota 4Runner |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 172.1" | 194.9" |
| Width | - | 78.0" |
| Height | 64.9" | 72.6" |
| Wheelbase | 105.6" | 112.2" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Land Rover | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | — |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Self-Leveling Headlights | ✓ | — |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Fog Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | — |
| Lane Departure Warning | — | ✓ |
| Front Cross Traffic Alert | — | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Land Rover | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.0 L | 2.4 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 246 hp @ 5500 rpm | 278 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 269 lb-ft @ 1300 rpm | 317 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Land Rover | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 9-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
| Hill Descent Control | ✓ | — |
Fuel
| Feature | Land Rover | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | premium unleaded (recommended) | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 20/27 MPG | 20/26 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 22 MPG | 22 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 354.0/477.9 mi. | 380.0/494.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 17.7 gal. | 19.0 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Land Rover | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Power Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Parking Sensors | ✓ | — |
| Rear Parking Sensors | ✓ | — |
| Wireless Charging Pad | ✓ | — |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Universal Remote Transmitter | ✓ | — |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror | ✓ | — |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Simulated Alloy Trim on Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | — | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Land Rover | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 11.4 in | 8.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Meridian Speakers | ✓ | — |
| Stereo Power | 400W | — |
| Speaker System | 12 | 8 |
| Subwoofer Count | 1 | — |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | 3 months |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | ✓ | — |
| USB Port with External Media Control | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Land Rover | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 4 |
| Moonroof Type | 1st Row Power Glass | — |
| Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Land Rover | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 37.4 in. | 39.7 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 40.0 in. | 41.8 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 56.6 in. | 58.0 in. |
| Seat Material: Leather | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | — |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | Power |
| Driver Seat Memory Settings | 3 | — |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | 6-way | — |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Lumbar Support | Power | — |
| Driver Seat Heating | Multi-level | — |
| Passenger Seat Heating | Multi-level | — |
| Front Hip Room | — | 55.2 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | — | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | — | 6-way |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | — | 6-way |
Rearseats
| Feature | Land Rover | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.1 in. | 37.8 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 34.0 in. | 34.8 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 55.4 in. | 57.8 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Hip Room | — | 56.1 in. |
| Reclining Rear Seats | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Land Rover | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Material | Alloy | — |
| Wheel Size | 18 x 8.0 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | R18 | P245/70R17 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | — |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | — |
| Wheel Finish | — | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Diameter | — | 17 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Land Rover | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Land Rover | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 6 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. | 2 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | — | 2 yr./ 25000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2025 Toyota 4Runner.
Which vehicle is more fuel-efficient for daily driving?
Both vehicles are rated identically at 22 MPG combined. However, the 4Runner operates efficiently on regular unleaded fuel, whereas the Evoque recommends premium unleaded, affecting long-term running costs.
How much larger is the 4Runner's interior storage compared to the Evoque?
The 4Runner is significantly more practical, offering 48.4 cu ft of cargo capacity. This is more than double the 21.6 cu ft available in the more compact Range Rover Evoque.
Is the Evoque significantly more powerful than the 4Runner?
Surprisingly, no; the 4Runner delivers the higher power figures, producing 278 hp and 317 lb-ft of torque. The Evoque trails with 246 hp and 269 lb-ft of torque.
What is the primary disadvantage of choosing the Evoque for long highway trips?
While both manage 27 MPG highway (Evoque) and 26 MPG highway (4Runner), the Evoque’s requirement for premium fuel can make high-mileage commutes considerably more expensive.
How does the price difference translate to the base feature sets?
The 4Runner saves buyers $8,630 compared to the Evoque's $49,900 MSRP, granting access to nearly 32 more horsepower for the lower entry cost.
Which vehicle is easier to park due to size?
The Range Rover Evoque is decidedly easier to manage in tight spots, measuring only 172.1 inches in length compared to the substantial 194.9-inch length of the boxier 4Runner.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool