2025 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs 2025 Mazda CX-70

$49,900 · Crossover

$40,445 · Crossover

Comparison Overview

Deciding between the premium badge and the superior practicality often comes down to prioritizing image versus sheer utility. If you're weighing the sophisticated $49,900 Range Rover Evoque against the much larger $40,445 Mazda CX-70, the numbers tell a clear story. The Mazda offers a significant advantage in space, boasting 39.6 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the Evoque's tight 21.6 cu ft, making it the better haul vehicle. Power favors the Mazda too, as it delivers 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque versus the Evoque's 246 hp. While both offer AWD, the Mazda also sips regular unleaded fuel and achieves a better 25 MPG combined, contrasting with the Evoque's requirement for premium fuel and lower 22 MPG combined. This $9,455 price gap, combined with better efficiency and outright space, positions the CX-70 as a very sensible choice against the Evoque’s luxury appeal.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

🚗 Best for Commuters

2025 Mazda CX-70

The Mazda CX-70 is the winner for commuters due to its superior combined fuel economy of 25 MPG, which uses regular fuel, against the Evoque's 22 MPG premium requirement.

👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Best for Families

2025 Mazda CX-70

Families will heavily favor the CX-70 because it offers significantly more utility with 39.6 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the Evoque's 21.6 cu ft.

🏎️ Best for Enthusiasts

2025 Mazda CX-70

The Mazda CX-70 appeals more to driving enthusiasts by delivering higher output with 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque.

💰 Best Value

2025 Mazda CX-70

The CX-70 provides outstanding value, offering more power and vastly more space while costing $9,455 less than the Range Rover Evoque.

Choose the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque if...

You prioritize brand cachet and a compact urban footprint (172.1 inches long).
You prefer the slightly better city fuel economy rating of 20 MPG in the Evoque.
You want a taller vehicle, as the Evoque sits at 64.9 inches high.

Choose the Mazda CX-70 if...

You need maximum utility, benefiting from the CX-70's 39.6 cu ft of cargo room.
You want the highest power figures, as the CX-70 makes 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque.
You want to save money on operating costs by using regular unleaded fuel instead of premium.

Key Dimensions

Dimension	Land Rover Range Rover Evoque	Mazda CX-70
Length	172.1"	200.8"
Width	-	-
Height	64.9"	68.2"
Wheelbase	105.6"	122.8"

Features Comparison

Safety

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Blind Spot Monitor	✓	✓
Lane Keeping Assist System	✓	✓
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	✓	✓
Driver Attention Alert	✓	✓
Pre-Collision Safety System	✓	✓
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags	✓	✓
Front Head Airbags	✓	✓
Rear Head Airbags	✓	✓
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation	✓	✓
Electronic Stability Control	✓	✓
Traction Control System	✓	✓
LATCH System	✓	✓
Rear Door Child Safety Locks	✓	✓
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS)	4-Wheel	4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes	✓	✓
Rear Solid Disc Brakes	✓	—
Brake Preparation System	✓	—
Brake Assist	✓	—
Tire Pressure Monitoring System	✓	✓
Automatic Headlights	✓	✓
Headlight Delay-Off	✓	✓
LED Headlights	✓	✓
Self-Leveling Headlights	✓	✓
Daytime Running Lights	✓	✓
Front Fog Lights	✓	—
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors	✓	✓
Front Headrests	2	2
Front Height Adjustable Headrests	✓	✓
Rear Headrests	3	3
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt	✓	✓
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote)	✓	—
Engine Immobilizer	✓	✓
Lane Departure Warning	—	✓
Post-Collision Safety System	—	✓
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes	—	✓
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests	—	✓

Engine

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Base Engine Displacement	2.0 L	3.3 L
Number of Cylinders	inline 4	inline 6
Base Engine Type	gas	mild hybrid
Horsepower	246 hp @ 5500 rpm	280 hp @ 5000 rpm
Torque	269 lb-ft @ 1300 rpm	332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm
Number of Valves	16	24
Camshaft Type	Double overhead cam (DOHC)	Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing	Variable	Variable
Fuel Injection Type	✓	✓

Drive Train

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Transmission Type	9-speed shiftable automatic	8-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type	all wheel drive	all wheel drive
Hill Descent Control	✓	✓
Center Differential Type	—	Limited Slip

Fuel

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Fuel Type	premium unleaded (recommended)	regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway)	20/27 MPG	24/28 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined)	22 MPG	25 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway)	354.0/477.9 mi.	444.0/518.0 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity	17.7 gal.	18.5 gal.

Comfort & Convenience

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Push Button Start	✓	✓
Power Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel	✓	—
Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Electric Power Steering	✓	✓
Rear View Camera	✓	✓
Front Parking Sensors	✓	✓
Rear Parking Sensors	✓	✓
Wireless Charging Pad	✓	✓
Adaptive Cruise Control	✓	✓
Universal Remote Transmitter	✓	—
Front Cupholders	✓	✓
Rear Cupholders	✓	✓
Front Door Pockets	✓	✓
Rear Door Pockets	✓	✓
Overhead Console with Storage	✓	✓
Front Seatback Storage	✓	✓
Leather Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Heated Steering Wheel	✓	—
Dual Zone Climate Control	✓	—
Rear Ventilation Ducts	✓	✓
Dual Vanity Mirrors	✓	✓
Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror	✓	—
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors	✓	✓
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel	—	✓
Three Zone Climate Control	—	✓

In Car Entertainment

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Infotainment Display	11.4 in	12.3 in
AM/FM Stereo	✓	✓
Meridian Speakers	✓	—
Stereo Power	400W	—
Speaker System	12	8
Subwoofer Count	1	—
Android Auto (Wireless)	✓	✓
Apple CarPlay (Wireless)	✓	✓
USB Port	✓	✓
Satellite Radio	✓	—
Satellite Radio Trial Period	3 months	—
Speed Sensitive Volume Control	✓	✓
USB Port with External Media Control	—	✓

Power Feature

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
One-Touch Power Windows	4	4
Moonroof Type	1st Row Power Glass	1st Row Power Glass
Keyless Entry	✓	✓
Heated Mirrors	✓	✓

Frontseats

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Front Head Room	37.4 in.	39.7 in.
Front Leg Room	40.0 in.	41.7 in.
Front Shoulder Room	56.6 in.	59.2 in.
Seat Material: Leather	✓	✓
Front Seat Type: Bucket	✓	✓
Driver Seat Power Adjustments	8-way	8-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment	✓	✓
Driver Seat Lumbar Support	Power	Power
Driver Seat Memory Settings	3	—
Passenger Seat Power Adjustments	6-way	4-way
Passenger Seat Height Adjustment	✓	—
Passenger Seat Lumbar Support	Power	—
Driver Seat Heating	Multi-level	Multi-level
Passenger Seat Heating	Multi-level	Multi-level
Front Hip Room	—	56.2 in.

Rearseats

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Rear Head Room	38.1 in.	39.3 in.
Rear Leg Room	34.0 in.	39.4 in.
Rear Shoulder Room	55.4 in.	58.1 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback	✓	✓
Folding Center Armrest	✓	✓
Rear Hip Room	—	55.5 in.
Reclining Rear Seats	—	✓

Tires and Wheels

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Wheel Material	Alloy	Alloy
Wheel Size	18 x 8.0 in	19 x 8.5 in
Tire Type	All Season	All Season
Tire Size	R18	265/55R19
Spare Tire Type	Temporary	Temporary
Spare Tire Location	Inside Mounted	Inside Mounted

Suspension

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension	✓	✓
Front Stabilizer Bar	✓	—
Rear Stabilizer Bar	✓	—
Stabilizer Bar	—	✓

Warranty

Feature	Land Rover	Mazda
Basic Warranty	4 yr./ 50000 mi.	3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty	4 yr./ 50000 mi.	5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty	6 yr./ unlimited mi.	5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance	4 yr./ 50000 mi.	3 yr./ 36000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2025 Mazda CX-70.

Is the 2025 Mazda CX-70 large enough for everyday family hauling compared to the Evoque?

Yes, the CX-70 is substantially larger, offering 39.6 cu ft of cargo space compared to the Evoque’s 21.6 cu ft. Additionally, the CX-70 is significantly longer at 200.8 inches versus the Evoque's 172.1 inches, providing more overall cabin room for passengers and gear.

Which vehicle is more affordable to fuel over the long term?

The Mazda CX-70 is the cheaper option for fueling, as it runs on regular unleaded fuel and achieves 25 MPG combined. The Range Rover Evoque requires premium fuel and only returns 22 MPG combined, leading to higher running costs.

How significant is the performance gap between the two crossovers?

The performance difference is noticeable; the CX-70 offers 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque. This outguns the Evoque, which produces 246 hp and 269 lb-ft of torque, making the Mazda quicker overall.

Does the Evoque offer better highway efficiency than the CX-70?

No, the CX-70 has slightly better highway efficiency at 28 MPG compared to the Evoque's 27 MPG. While both are close on the highway, the Mazda’s city efficiency (24 MPG vs 20 MPG) gives it the overall MPG advantage.

What is the exact price difference I should expect between the 2025 models?

Based on the stated MSRPs, the 2025 Mazda CX-70 starts at $40,445, meaning it is $9,455 cheaper than the 2025 Range Rover Evoque starting at $49,900.

Which vehicle is easier to maneuver in tight city parking situations?

The Range Rover Evoque is substantially smaller in length at 172.1 inches, making it the physically more compact vehicle for tight city maneuvering compared to the much longer 200.8-inch Mazda CX-70.