2025 Kia Telluride vs 2025 Mazda CX-50

Kia Telluride

$36,390 Β· Crossover

vs
Mazda CX-50

$30,500 Β· Crossover

Comparison Overview

Deciding between the spacious 2025 Kia Telluride and the efficient 2025 Mazda CX-50 boils down to prioritizing size versus savings. If you need maximum room, the Telluride offers a substantial footprint at 196.9 inches long and boasts a 291 hp V6 engine, though it only returns 22 combined MPG. Conversely, the CX-50 undercuts the Kia by a significant $5,890 starting MSRP ($30,500 vs $36,390) and is significantly thriftier, achieving 28 combined MPG. While the Telluride offers 104 more horsepower, the CX-50 compensates with standard All-Wheel Drive and a more usable 31.4 cubic feet of cargo space compared to the Kia's 21 cu ft. Your choice hinges on whether that extra space and power are worth the higher initial cost and increased fuel stops.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

πŸš— Best for Commuters

2025 Mazda CX-50

The Mazda CX-50 is the clear winner for daily commuting due to its superior 28 combined MPG rating.

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§β€πŸ‘¦ Best for Families

2025 Kia Telluride

The Kia Telluride wins for families needing more sheer space, evidenced by its greater overall dimensions and larger cabin.

🏎️ Best for Enthusiasts

2025 Kia Telluride

Enthusiasts will prefer the Kia Telluride's robust 291 hp and 262 lb-ft of torque over the Mazda's output.

πŸ’° Best Value

2025 Mazda CX-50

The Mazda CX-50 provides better overall value by costing $5,890 less and delivering significantly better fuel economy.

Choose the Kia Telluride if...

  • You absolutely need the extra muscle provided by the 291 hp engine for towing or highway passing.
  • Your passengers require the maximum interior volume that a longer 196.9-inch body provides.
  • You prefer the standard front-wheel drive configuration with the 8-speed automatic transmission.

Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...

  • Saving money upfront is key, as the CX-50 starts at only $30,500, nearly $6,000 less than Car 1.
  • You value fuel efficiency, as the CX-50 gets 28 combined MPG compared to Car 1's 22 combined MPG.
  • You need more accessible storage, benefiting from the CX-50's superior 31.4 cubic feet of cargo space.

Key Dimensions

Dimension Kia Telluride Mazda CX-50
Length 196.9" 185.8"
Width 78.3" 75.6"
Height 68.9" 63.5"
Wheelbase 114.2" 110.8"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Kia Mazda
Blind Spot Monitor βœ“ βœ“
Lane Departure Warning βœ“ βœ“
Lane Keeping Assist System βœ“ βœ“
Rear Cross Traffic Alert βœ“ βœ“
Driver Attention Alert βœ“ βœ“
Pre-Collision Safety System βœ“ βœ“
Post-Collision Safety System βœ“ βœ“
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags βœ“ βœ“
Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags βœ“ β€”
Front Head Airbags βœ“ βœ“
Rear Head Airbags βœ“ βœ“
Third Row Head Airbags βœ“ β€”
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation βœ“ βœ“
Electronic Stability Control βœ“ βœ“
Traction Control System βœ“ βœ“
LATCH System βœ“ βœ“
Rear Door Child Safety Locks βœ“ βœ“
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes βœ“ βœ“
Rear Solid Disc Brakes βœ“ βœ“
Brake Assist βœ“ βœ“
Tire Pressure Monitoring System βœ“ βœ“
Automatic Headlights βœ“ βœ“
Headlight Delay-Off βœ“ βœ“
LED Headlights βœ“ βœ“
Daytime Running Lights βœ“ βœ“
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors βœ“ βœ“
Front Headrests 2 2
Front Height Adjustable Headrests βœ“ βœ“
Rear Headrests 3 3
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests βœ“ βœ“
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt βœ“ βœ“
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) βœ“ β€”
Engine Immobilizer βœ“ βœ“
Engine
Feature Kia Mazda
Base Engine Displacement 3.8 L 2.5 L
Number of Cylinders V6 inline 4
Base Engine Type gas gas
Horsepower 291 hp @ 6000 rpm 187 hp @ 6000 rpm
Torque 262 lb-ft @ 5200 rpm 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Number of Valves 24 16
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type βœ“ βœ“
Cylinder Deactivation β€” βœ“
Drive Train
Feature Kia Mazda
Transmission Type 8-speed automatic 6-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type front wheel drive all wheel drive
Hill Descent Control βœ“ β€”
Fuel
Feature Kia Mazda
Fuel Type regular unleaded regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 20/26 MPG 25/31 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 22 MPG 28 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 376.0/488.8 mi. 397.5/492.9 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 18.8 gal. 15.9 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Kia Mazda
Push Button Start βœ“ βœ“
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel βœ“ βœ“
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel βœ“ βœ“
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel βœ“ βœ“
Electric Power Steering βœ“ βœ“
Rear View Camera βœ“ βœ“
Rear Parking Sensors βœ“ β€”
Adaptive Cruise Control βœ“ βœ“
Front Cupholders βœ“ βœ“
Rear Cupholders βœ“ βœ“
3rd Row Cupholders βœ“ β€”
Front Door Pockets βœ“ βœ“
Rear Door Pockets βœ“ βœ“
Overhead Console with Storage βœ“ βœ“
Front Seatback Storage βœ“ βœ“
Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry βœ“ β€”
Leather Steering Wheel βœ“ βœ“
Three Zone Climate Control βœ“ β€”
Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control βœ“ β€”
Extended Cabin Heating/Cooling βœ“ β€”
Dual Vanity Mirrors βœ“ βœ“
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors βœ“ βœ“
Dual Zone Climate Control β€” βœ“
Rear Ventilation Ducts β€” βœ“
Interior Air Filtration β€” βœ“
In Car Entertainment
Feature Kia Mazda
Infotainment Display 12.3 in 10.3 in
AM/FM Stereo βœ“ βœ“
Speaker System 6 8
Android Auto (Wired) βœ“ β€”
Apple CarPlay (Wired) βœ“ β€”
USB Port βœ“ βœ“
USB Port with External Media Control βœ“ βœ“
Satellite Radio βœ“ β€”
Satellite Radio Trial Period 3 months β€”
Android Auto (Wireless) β€” βœ“
Apple CarPlay (Wireless) β€” βœ“
Power Feature
Feature Kia Mazda
One-Touch Power Windows 4 4
Keyless Entry βœ“ βœ“
Heated Mirrors βœ“ βœ“
Frontseats
Feature Kia Mazda
Front Head Room 40.9 in. 39.1 in.
Front Leg Room 41.4 in. 41.7 in.
Front Shoulder Room 61.6 in. 55.9 in.
Front Hip Room 58.9 in. 53.6 in.
Seat Material: Leatherette βœ“ βœ“
Front Seat Type: Bucket βœ“ βœ“
Driver Seat Manual Adjustments 6-way 6-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment βœ“ βœ“
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments 6-way 4-way
Passenger Seat Height Adjustment βœ“ β€”
Rearseats
Feature Kia Mazda
Rear Head Room 40.2 in. 38.6 in.
Rear Leg Room 42.4 in. 39.8 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 61.2 in. 53.6 in.
Rear Hip Room 58.0 in. 52.1 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback βœ“ βœ“
Folding Center Armrest βœ“ βœ“
Manual Folding Third Row Seat βœ“ β€”
Tires and Wheels
Feature Kia Mazda
Wheel Material Alloy β€”
Wheel Size 18 x 7.5 in 17 x 7.0 in
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size P245/60R18 P225/65R17
Spare Tire Type Temporary Temporary
Spare Tire Location Inside Mounted Inside Mounted
Wheel Finish β€” Painted Alloy
Suspension
Feature Kia Mazda
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension βœ“ β€”
Front Stabilizer Bar βœ“ β€”
Rear Stabilizer Bar βœ“ β€”
Front Suspension Type β€” Independent
Stabilizer Bar β€” βœ“
Warranty
Feature Kia Mazda
Basic Warranty 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 10 yr./ 100000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 5 yr./ 100000 mi. 5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Kia Telluride and 2025 Mazda CX-50.

How much does the price difference affect long-term ownership between these two crossovers?

The initial $5,890 MSRP gap is compounded by fuel costs; the CX-50 gets 6 MPG better efficiency (28 vs 22 combined), meaning the Kia will require more frequent and costly stops at the pump over time.

Is the power difference between the Kia Telluride and Mazda CX-50 noticeable for daily driving?

Yes, the Telluride has a distinct advantage with 291 hp compared to the CX-50’s 187 hp, which translates to noticeably quicker acceleration and easier merging onto busy highways.

Which vehicle offers better utility for hauling luggage on a long trip?

The Mazda CX-50 offers superior utility despite its smaller size, packing 31.4 cubic feet of cargo space, significantly more than the Kia Telluride’s 21 cubic feet.

Why does the smaller Mazda CX-50 come standard with All-Wheel Drive when the larger Telluride is FWD?

Mazda typically equips the CX-50 with standard AWD for enhanced traction in varied conditions, whereas the Telluride utilizes front-wheel drive as its base configuration.

If I drive a lot, what is the difference in the recommended fuel type?

Both vehicles recommend regular unleaded fuel, which keeps fueling costs consistent per gallon, but the Telluride will consume that fuel much faster due to lower mileage.

Are there significant size differences that affect parking ease?

The CX-50 is noticeably smaller overall, being nearly 11 inches shorter in length (185.8 in vs 196.9 in), making it easier to maneuver and park in tight city spots than the larger Telluride.

More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool