2025 Kia Sorento vs 2025 Mazda CX-50
Comparison Overview
The 2025 Kia Sorento and 2025 Mazda CX-50 present distinct value propositions, most significantly separated by cargo volume, where the CX-50 offers a massive 31.4 cu ft compared to the Sorento's 12.6 cu ft. Pricing is close, with the CX-50 starting at $30,500 versus the Sorento's $31,990 MSRP, despite the Sorento having standard Front-Wheel Drive (FWD) while the CX-50 includes All-Wheel Drive (AWD). Performance metrics are nearly identical; the Sorento edges out slightly in power with 191 hp and 181 lb-ft of torque compared to the CX-50’s 187 hp and 185 lb-ft. Fuel economy favors the Mazda slightly, achieving 28 combined MPG versus the Sorento’s 26 combined MPG. However, the Sorento is physically longer at 189.6 inches, whereas the CX-50 is lower by over 3 inches (66.7 inches vs. 63.5 inches), suggesting different utility profiles despite both being crossovers.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Mazda CX-50
The Mazda CX-50 wins for commuters due to its superior 28 combined MPG and standard AWD, offering better efficiency and traction versatility.
2025 Kia Sorento
Despite its smaller stated cargo capacity, the Kia Sorento's longer 189.6-inch length and typically standard third-row capability (implied by segment norms for Sorento) makes it better suited for family transport.
2025 Mazda CX-50
The CX-50’s higher torque (185 lb-ft vs. 181 lb-ft) and shorter overall length, paired with standard AWD, suggest a more engaging driving dynamic.
2025 Mazda CX-50
The Mazda CX-50 is cheaper at $30,500, delivers 2 MPG better efficiency, and includes AWD standard over the Sorento’s FWD configuration.
Choose the Kia Sorento if...
- You require the slightly higher peak horsepower output of 191 hp for freeway merging.
- You prefer the longer wheelbase suggested by the Sorento’s 189.6-inch overall length for potentially smoother highway cruising.
- You prioritize the 23 MPG city rating associated with its FWD setup over the CX-50's 25 MPG city rating, if you rarely drive in the city.
Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...
- Maximum usable storage space is critical, as the CX-50 provides 31.4 cu ft of cargo capacity, significantly more than the Sorento's 12.6 cu ft.
- All-Wheel Drive capability is necessary, as it is standard on the CX-50 compared to the FWD base of the Sorento.
- Better base efficiency is desired, highlighted by the CX-50's 28 combined MPG rating versus the Sorento's 26 combined MPG.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Kia Sorento | Mazda CX-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 189.6" | 185.8" |
| Width | 74.8" | 75.6" |
| Height | 66.7" | 63.5" |
| Wheelbase | 110.8" | 110.8" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Kia | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | — |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third Row Head Airbags | ✓ | — |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | — |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Kia | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.5 L | 2.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 191 hp @ 6100 rpm | 187 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 181 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cylinder Deactivation | — | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Kia | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 8-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | front wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| Hill Descent Control | ✓ | — |
Fuel
| Feature | Kia | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 23/31 MPG | 25/31 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 26 MPG | 28 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 407.1/548.7 mi. | 397.5/492.9 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 17.7 gal. | 15.9 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Kia | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| 3rd Row Cupholders | ✓ | — |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry | ✓ | — |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Extended Cabin Heating/Cooling | ✓ | — |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | — | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | — | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Kia | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 12.3 in | 10.3 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 8 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auxiliary Audio Input | ✓ | — |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | — |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | — |
Power Feature
| Feature | Kia | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 1 | 4 |
| Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Kia | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 40.3 in. | 39.1 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.4 in. | 41.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 59.1 in. | 55.9 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 55.6 in. | 53.6 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | — | ✓ |
Rearseats
| Feature | Kia | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.1 in. | 38.6 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 41.7 in. | 39.8 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 58.1 in. | 53.6 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 55.1 in. | 52.1 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | ✓ | — |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | ✓ |
| Manual Folding Third Row Seat | ✓ | — |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Kia | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Material | Alloy | — |
| Wheel Size | 17 x 7.0 in | 17 x 7.0 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 235/65R17 | P225/65R17 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Finish | — | Painted Alloy |
Suspension
| Feature | Kia | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | — |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Front Suspension Type | — | Independent |
| Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Kia | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 10 yr./ 100000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ 100000 mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Kia Sorento and 2025 Mazda CX-50.
Which crossover offers better outright cargo hauling capabilities?
The 2025 Mazda CX-50 offers significantly more cargo capacity at 31.4 cubic feet. In contrast, the 2025 Kia Sorento lists only 12.6 cubic feet of cargo space, suggesting the CX-50 is superior for utility tasks based on these stated measurements.
How do the base powertrains compare in terms of output and economy?
The Kia Sorento has a slight edge in horsepower (191 hp vs. 187 hp) and torque (181 lb-ft vs. 185 lb-ft if the CX-50's 185 lb-ft measurement is for the base engine), but the CX-50 maintains better fuel economy at 28 combined MPG versus the Sorento’s 26 combined MPG.
Is there a significant difference in the starting price between these two models?
Yes, the Mazda CX-50 carries a lower entry MSRP of $30,500, while the Kia Sorento begins at $31,990. This $1,490 difference is compounded by the CX-50 including AWD standard.
What is the primary drivetrain difference between the two base models?
The 2025 Kia Sorento comes standard with Front-Wheel Drive (FWD) mated to an 8-speed automatic transmission. Conversely, the 2025 Mazda CX-50 features All-Wheel Drive (AWD) standard paired with a 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission.
Considering exterior dimensions, how do the sizes align?
The Kia Sorento is physically the larger vehicle, measuring 189.6 inches long and 66.7 inches high. The Mazda CX-50 is notably shorter in height at 63.5 inches, which contributes to its lower center of gravity but sacrifices overall interior volume compared to the Sorento.
Do these vehicles use the same type of fuel and transmission?
Both vehicles use regular unleaded fuel, aligning on fuel type requirements. However, the Sorento utilizes an 8-speed automatic transmission, while the CX-50 employs a 6-speed shiftable automatic.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool