2025 Honda HR-V vs 2026 Mazda CX-50
Comparison Overview
The 2025 Honda HR-V kicks off the comparison with its appealing $25,400 entry price and superior fuel economy, achieving 28 combined MPG from its 158 hp engine. It remains the pragmatic choice for cost-conscious buyers focusing on efficiency in the urban jungle. Conversely, the 2026 Mazda CX-50 screams driver engagement with a muscular 187 hp and 185 lb-ft of torque, backed by standard All-Wheel Drive (AWD) and a more robust 31.4 cu ft of cargo spaceโa significant upgrade over the HR-V's 24.4 cu ft. While the Mazda commands a $4,500 higher MSRP, it delivers 29 more horsepower, appealing directly to those who prioritize driving dynamics and utility over ultimate thriftiness. This comparison pits Honda's proven reliability and efficiency against Mazda's spirited performance and upscale feel.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Honda HR-V
The HR-V wins for commuters due to its superior combined 28 MPG rating and lower initial cost.
2026 Mazda CX-50
The CX-50 offers substantially more utility with 31.4 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the HR-V's 24.4 cu ft.
2026 Mazda CX-50
The CX-50 provides a significantly more thrilling experience with 187 hp and standard AWD.
2025 Honda HR-V
The HR-V delivers excellent baseline utility for $4,500 less than the CX-50.
Choose the Honda HR-V if...
- Your primary concern is maximizing fuel budget with a 28 combined MPG rating.
- You need the most affordable entry point into a new crossover at an MSRP of $25,400.
- You prefer maneuverability due to the HR-V's slightly smaller footprint (179.8 inches long).
Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...
- You demand greater power, leveraging the CX-50's 187 hp and 185 lb-ft of torque.
- All-weather capability is essential, as the CX-50 includes All-Wheel Drive standard.
- Maximum hauling capability is required, utilizing the CX-50's substantial 31.4 cu ft of cargo space.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Honda HR-V | Mazda CX-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 179.8" | 185.8" |
| Width | 72.4" | 75.6" |
| Height | 63.4" | 63.5" |
| Wheelbase | 104.5" | 110.8" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Honda | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Lane Departure Warning | โ | โ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | โ | โ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | โ | โ |
| Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags | โ | โ |
| Front Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Rear Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | โ | โ |
| Electronic Stability Control | โ | โ |
| Traction Control System | โ | โ |
| LATCH System | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | โ | โ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Brake Assist | โ | โ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | โ | โ |
| Automatic Headlights | โ | โ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | โ | โ |
| LED Headlights | โ | โ |
| Daytime Running Lights | โ | โ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | โ | โ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | โ | โ |
| Engine Immobilizer | โ | โ |
| Blind Spot Monitor | โ | โ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | โ | โ |
| Driver Attention Alert | โ | โ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
Engine
| Feature | Honda | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.0 L | 2.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 158 hp @ 6500 rpm | 187 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 138 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm | 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | โ | โ |
| Cylinder Deactivation | โ | โ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Honda | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | continuously variable-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | front wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| Hill Descent Control | โ | โ |
Fuel
| Feature | Honda | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 26/32 MPG | 24/30 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 28 MPG | 26 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 364.0/448.0 mi. | 381.6/477.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 14.0 gal. | 15.9 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Honda | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | โ | โ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Electric Power Steering | โ | โ |
| Rear View Camera | โ | โ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | โ | โ |
| Front Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Front Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Front Seatback Storage | โ | โ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | โ | โ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | โ | โ |
| Rear Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | โ | โ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Interior Air Filtration | โ | โ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | โ | โ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Honda | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 7.0 in | 10.3 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | โ | โ |
| Stereo Power | 180W | โ |
| Speaker System | 4 | 8 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | โ | โ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | โ | โ |
| USB Port | โ | โ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | โ | โ |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | โ | โ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Honda | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 1 | 4 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | โ | โ |
| Heated Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Keyless Entry | โ | โ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Honda | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 39.4 in. | 39.1 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.9 in. | 41.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 56.6 in. | 55.9 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 54.0 in. | 53.6 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | โ | โ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | โ | โ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | โ | โ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | โ | โ |
Rearseats
| Feature | Honda | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.0 in. | 38.6 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 37.7 in. | 39.8 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 55.2 in. | 53.6 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 47.4 in. | 52.1 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | โ | โ |
| Folding Center Armrest | โ | โ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Honda | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Material | Alloy | โ |
| Wheel Diameter | 17 in | โ |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 215/60R H | P225/65R17 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Finish | โ | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Size | โ | 17 x 7.0 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Honda | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | โ | โ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Front Suspension Type | โ | Independent |
| Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
Warranty
| Feature | Honda | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | 2 yr./ 24000 mi. | โ |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Honda HR-V and 2026 Mazda CX-50.
How significant is the power difference between these two crossovers?
The Mazda CX-50 boasts a noticeable advantage, producing 187 horsepower, which is 29 hp more than the Honda HR-V's 158 hp. This torque difference (185 lb-ft vs. 138 lb-ft) means the CX-50 will feel considerably punchier during acceleration and highway passing maneuvers.
Which vehicle is better for long-distance highway cruising regarding fuel economy?
The Honda HR-V edges out the CX-50 in highway fuel economy, rated at 32 MPG versus the Mazda's 30 MPG. However, the HR-V's performance relies on FWD and a CVT, while the CX-50 achieves its efficiency with standard AWD and a conventional 6-speed automatic.
Is the $4,500 price difference between the HR-V and CX-50 justified by the specs?
The difference stems from the CX-50's higher output engine, standard AWD, and significantly larger cargo volume (31.4 cu ft vs 24.4 cu ft). Buyers paying the premium are securing better performance and more utility features than the base HR-V.
Does the HR-V or the CX-50 offer more practical storage space for larger items?
The 2026 Mazda CX-50 provides considerably more utility for families or adventurers, offering 31.4 cubic feet of cargo capacity. The 2025 Honda HR-V is notably smaller inside, topping out at 24.4 cubic feet.
Which vehicle provides a more engaging driving experience?
Enthusiasts will gravitate towards the CX-50 due to its superior power figures and standard All-Wheel Drive setup paired with a shiftable automatic transmission. The HR-V uses a continuously variable transmission (CVT), which generally prioritizes smoothness over spirited driving engagement.
Are both vehicles compatible with regular unleaded gasoline?
Yes, both the 2025 Honda HR-V and the 2026 Mazda CX-50 are specified to run on regular unleaded fuel, which is a point of parity in long-term running costs, despite their differences in MPG.
More Budget SUVs Under $30,000
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool