2025 Honda CR-V vs 2025 Toyota 4Runner
Comparison Overview
Picking between a fuel-sipping crossover and a rugged SUV often leaves buyers stuck: do you prioritize daily running costs or go-anywhere capability? The 2025 Honda CR-V kicks things off at an accessible $30,100, offering a compelling 30 combined MPG, which drastically cuts down on trips to the pump compared to the 2025 Toyota 4Runner's 22 combined MPG. The CR-V's lower stance and efficiency make it a dream for urban commuting. However, the 4Runner counters with substantial muscle, boasting 278 hp and 317 lb-ft of torque, dwarfing the CR-V's 190 hp. While the 4Runner provides superior utility with 48.4 cu ft of cargo space versus the CR-V's 39.3 cu ft, that size and power come at a significant cost—an $11,170 higher starting MSRP and notably lower mileage.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Honda CR-V
The CR-V wins for commuting due to its superior 30 combined MPG and smaller footprint.
2025 Toyota 4Runner
The 4Runner is better for families needing maximum space, offering 48.4 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the CR-V's 39.3 cu ft.
2025 Toyota 4Runner
Enthusiasts will favor the 4Runner for its significantly higher output of 278 hp and 317 lb-ft of torque.
2025 Honda CR-V
The CR-V offers better value by costing $11,170 less and delivering 8 more MPG overall.
Choose the Honda CR-V if...
- You want to save substantial money upfront, as the CR-V starts at only $30,100.
- Fuel economy is a major concern, given the CR-V achieves 34 MPG highway.
- You prefer a smaller vehicle for easier city parking and maneuvering (184.8 inches long).
Choose the Toyota 4Runner if...
- You need serious towing and off-road power, thanks to the 4Runner’s 317 lb-ft of torque.
- Maximum cargo volume is essential, as the 4Runner offers 48.4 cu ft.
- You require more ground clearance implied by the 72.6-inch height for rugged terrain.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Honda CR-V | Toyota 4Runner |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 184.8" | 194.9" |
| Width | 73.5" | 78.0" |
| Height | 66.2" | 72.6" |
| Wheelbase | 106.3" | 112.2" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Honda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | — |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | — |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | — |
| Blind Spot Monitor | — | ✓ |
| Front Cross Traffic Alert | — | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Front Fog Lights | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Honda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 1.5 L | 2.4 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 190 hp @ 6000 rpm | 278 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 179 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm | 317 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Honda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | continuously variable-speed automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | front wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
| Hill Descent Control | ✓ | — |
Fuel
| Feature | Honda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 28/34 MPG | 20/26 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 30 MPG | 22 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 392.0/476.0 mi. | 380.0/494.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 14.0 gal. | 19.0 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Honda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | ✓ | — |
| Leather Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Simulated Alloy Trim on Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Honda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 7.0 in | 8.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stereo Power | 160W | — |
| Speaker System | 4 | 8 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | ✓ | — |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | ✓ | — |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | ✓ | — |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | — | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | — | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | — | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | — | 3 months |
Power Feature
| Feature | Honda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 2 | 4 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | — |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Keyless Entry | — | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Honda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 40.0 in. | 39.7 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.3 in. | 41.8 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.9 in. | 58.0 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 55.6 in. | 55.2 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | — | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | — | Power |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | — | 6-way |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | — | ✓ |
Rearseats
| Feature | Honda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.2 in. | 37.8 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 41.0 in. | 34.8 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 55.9 in. | 57.8 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 52.6 in. | 56.1 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | ✓ | ✓ |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Honda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Material | Steel | — |
| Wheel Cover Type | ✓ | — |
| Wheel Diameter | 17 in | 17 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 235/65R | P245/70R17 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | — |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | — |
| Wheel Finish | — | Painted Alloy |
Suspension
| Feature | Honda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Honda | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 2 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | — | 2 yr./ 25000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Honda CR-V and 2025 Toyota 4Runner.
How significant is the difference in power between these two vehicles?
The difference in power is substantial; the 2025 Toyota 4Runner produces 278 hp and 317 lb-ft of torque, whereas the 2025 Honda CR-V is rated at 190 hp and 179 lb-ft of torque, resulting in an 88 hp gap.
Is the 4Runner's extra size worth the price and efficiency penalty for an average driver?
For the average driver, the 4Runner's larger size (194.9 inches long vs. CR-V's 184.8 inches) and increased thirst may hurt daily budgets, especially since it starts $11,170 higher and nets only 22 combined MPG.
Which vehicle handles daily driving and traffic better based on specs?
The Honda CR-V is better suited for daily driving, featuring a much higher combined MPG of 30 and a lighter curb weight implied by its crossover construction compared to the rugged 4Runner.
If I carry a lot of gear, which SUV provides more room?
The 2025 Toyota 4Runner is the clear winner for cargo, offering 48.4 cubic feet of space behind the rear seats, significantly more than the CR-V’s 39.3 cubic feet.
Do either of these vehicles require premium fuel?
Fortunately, both the 2025 Honda CR-V and the 2025 Toyota 4Runner are specified to run on regular unleaded fuel, helping to manage running costs despite their differences in MPG.
What is the advantage of the CR-V's continuously variable transmission over the 4Runner's 8-speed automatic?
The CR-V's continuously variable transmission is designed primarily for efficiency, directly contributing to its best-in-class 34 MPG highway rating, unlike the 4Runner's geared automatic transmission which prioritizes ruggedness and power delivery.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool