2025 Ford Maverick vs 2026 Mazda CX-50
Comparison Overview
Choosing between the 2025 Ford Maverick and the 2026 Mazda CX-50 often comes down to prioritizing extreme efficiency versus robust driving dynamics. Buyers often face the dilemma: do I want a tiny truck bed for utility or a more traditional, capable crossover experience? The Maverick clearly dominates in fuel economy, achieving a superb combined 38 MPG from its 191 hp engine, far surpassing the CX-50's 26 MPG combined. However, the CX-50 boasts superior torque at 185 lb-ft compared to the Maverick's 155 lb-ft, despite having slightly less horsepower (187 hp). While the Maverick starts slightly cheaper at $28,145 versus the Mazda's $29,900, this initial saving is magnified by the Maverick's yearly fuel cost advantage. Furthermore, the Maverick is nearly 4 inches longer than the CX-50, giving it a unique footprint in the segment.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Ford Maverick
The Maverick's 38 MPG combined fuel economy makes it the undisputed champion for saving money on daily driving.
2026 Mazda CX-50
Although smaller overall, the CX-50 offers a standard 31.4 cu ft of cargo capacity and All-Wheel Drive, which often appeals more to families needing secure hauling space.
2026 Mazda CX-50
The Mazda's higher torque figure (185 lb-ft) and more traditional 6-speed automatic transmission generally suggest a more engaging driving feel than the Maverick's FWD setup.
2025 Ford Maverick
The Maverick wins on value due to its significantly lower starting MSRP of $28,145 and substantially better 38 MPG combined rating.
Choose the Ford Maverick if...
- Your primary concern is maximizing fuel savings, leveraging its 42 MPG city rating.
- You need the utility of a truck bed, even if it's small (it's a truck body type, not a standard SUV).
- You prefer a lower entry price point, starting at just $28,145.
Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...
- You prioritize traction and stability via standard All-Wheel Drive.
- You require a dedicated 31.4 cu ft of enclosed cargo space.
- You value better pulling power indicated by the higher 185 lb-ft torque rating.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Maverick | Mazda CX-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 199.8" | 185.8" |
| Width | 72.6" | 75.6" |
| Height | 68.8" | 63.5" |
| Wheelbase | 121.1" | 110.8" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | โ | โ |
| Front Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Rear Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | โ | โ |
| Electronic Stability Control | โ | โ |
| Traction Control System | โ | โ |
| LATCH System | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | โ | โ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Brake Preparation System | โ | โ |
| Brake Assist | โ | โ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | โ | โ |
| Automatic Headlights | โ | โ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | โ | โ |
| LED Headlights | โ | โ |
| Daytime Running Lights | โ | โ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | โ | โ |
| Engine Immobilizer | โ | โ |
| Blind Spot Monitor | โ | โ |
| Lane Departure Warning | โ | โ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | โ | โ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | โ | โ |
| Driver Attention Alert | โ | โ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.5 L | 2.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | hybrid | gas |
| Horsepower | 191 hp @ 5600 rpm | 187 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 155 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | โ | โ |
| Cylinder Deactivation | โ | โ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | electrically variable-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | front wheel drive | all wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 42/35 MPG | 24/30 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 38 MPG | 26 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 579.6/483.0 mi. | 381.6/477.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 13.8 gal. | 15.9 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Electric Power Steering | โ | โ |
| Rear View Camera | โ | โ |
| Cruise Control | โ | โ |
| Front Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Rear Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Front Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | โ | โ |
| Front Seatback Storage | โ | โ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Interior Air Filtration | โ | โ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Push Button Start | โ | โ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | โ | โ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | โ | โ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | โ | โ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | โ | โ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 13.2 in | 10.3 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | โ | โ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 8 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | โ | โ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | โ | โ |
| USB Port | โ | โ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | โ | โ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 1 | 4 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | โ | โ |
| Heated Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Keyless Entry | โ | โ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 40.2 in. | 39.1 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 42.8 in. | 41.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.3 in. | 55.9 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 55.4 in. | 53.6 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | โ | โ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | โ | โ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | โ | โ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | โ | โ |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.6 in. | 38.6 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 35.9 in. | 39.8 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 55.6 in. | 53.6 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 54.1 in. | 52.1 in. |
| Folding Rear Seatback | โ | โ |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | โ | โ |
| Folding Center Armrest | โ | โ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Steel | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Diameter | 17 in | โ |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 225/65R17 | P225/65R17 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Underbody Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Size | โ | 17 x 7.0 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | Independent |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Maverick and 2026 Mazda CX-50.
How much better is the fuel economy between the 2025 Maverick and the 2026 CX-50?
The difference is substantial; the Maverick delivers 38 MPG combined, while the CX-50 manages only 26 MPG combined, meaning the Maverick will save you significantly on gas over the long run.
Does the Mazda CX-50 have better performance for spirited driving than the Maverick?
Enthusiasts will likely prefer the CX-50, which offers 185 lb-ft of torque compared to the Maverick's 155 lb-ft. Also, the CX-50 includes AWD while the Maverick is FWD.
Which vehicle is generally cheaper to purchase right now?
The 2025 Ford Maverick holds a slight edge in initial cost, starting at $28,145, compared to the 2026 Mazda CX-50's MSRP of $29,900.
What is the main difference in body style I should consider?
Although both are classified as crossovers for this comparison, the Maverick has the unique profile of a small truck offering an open bed, whereas the CX-50 is a traditional closed SUV body with 31.4 cu ft of cargo space.
Are the dimensions very different for city parking?
Yes, the Maverick is noticeably longer at 199.8 inches versus the CX-50's 185.8 inches. Interestingly, the CX-50 is wider at 75.6 inches compared to the Maverick's 72.6 inches.
Do both vehicles use regular unleaded fuel?
Fortunately, both the 2025 Ford Maverick and the 2026 Mazda CX-50 are specified to run on regular unleaded gasoline, keeping running costs predictable for both models.
More Budget SUVs Under $30,000
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool