2025 Ford Maverick vs 2025 Nissan Kicks
Comparison Overview
Choosing between the 2025 Ford Maverick and the 2025 Nissan Kicks really comes down to what you value most: utility and efficiency or upfront savings. Buyers often grapple with needing a bit more capability versus sticking to a tighter budget. The Maverick starts significantly higher at $28,145 compared to the Kicks' $21,830 MSRP, a gap of $6,315. However, the Maverick boasts superior fuel economy, achieving a combined 38 MPG versus the Kicks' 31 MPG, meaning long-term running costs might favor the Ford. Power delivery is also notably different; the Maverick offers 191 hp, substantially more than the Kicks’ 141 hp. While the Kicks is shorter by almost 28 inches in length (171.9 inches vs. 199.8 inches), which helps with parking, the Maverick’s focus on efficiency and mild capability makes it a compelling, albeit pricier, package.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Ford Maverick
The 2025 Ford Maverick wins for commuters due to its class-leading 38 combined MPG, saving money on fuel stops.
2025 Ford Maverick
Despite being the more expensive option, the Maverick is structurally larger at 199.8 inches long, likely offering more interior space for families.
2025 Ford Maverick
With 191 hp and 155 lb-ft of torque, the Maverick provides significantly more output than the Kicks' 141 hp.
2025 Nissan Kicks
The 2025 Nissan Kicks offers substantial value by saving buyers $6,315 upfront compared to the Maverick's starting price.
Choose the Ford Maverick if...
- You prioritize fuel savings and want an impressive 38 combined MPG rating.
- You need more performance on tap, benefiting from the 191 hp output.
- You appreciate the slight advantage in overall physical size, with a length of 199.8 inches.
Choose the Nissan Kicks if...
- Keeping the initial purchase price low is paramount, given the $21,830 MSRP.
- You frequently carry items and need accessible space, benefiting from the 30 cu ft of cargo capacity.
- Maneuverability in tight spots is key, as the Kicks is nearly 28 inches shorter than the Maverick.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Maverick | Nissan Kicks |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 199.8" | 171.9" |
| Width | 72.6" | 70.9" |
| Height | 68.8" | 64.2" |
| Wheelbase | 121.1" | 104.6" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | — |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Blind Spot Monitor | — | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | — | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | — | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | — | ✓ |
| Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags | — | ✓ |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Rear Fixed Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.5 L | 2.0 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | hybrid | gas |
| Horsepower | 191 hp @ 5600 rpm | 141 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 155 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 140 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | electrically variable-speed automatic | continuously variable-speed automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | front wheel drive | front wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 42/35 MPG | 28/35 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 38 MPG | 31 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 579.6/483.0 mi. | 333.2/416.5 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 13.8 gal. | 11.9 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | — |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Push Button Start | — | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 13.2 in | 7.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 4 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | — |
| Auxiliary Audio Input | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 1 | 2 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 40.2 in. | 39.7 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 42.8 in. | 42.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.3 in. | 54.7 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 55.4 in. | 52.4 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.6 in. | 38.5 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 35.9 in. | 34.5 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 55.6 in. | 54.7 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 54.1 in. | 50.1 in. |
| Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | — |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Steel | — |
| Wheel Diameter | 17 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 225/65R17 | 215/60R16 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | — |
| Spare Tire Location | Underbody Mounted | — |
| Wheel Material | — | Steel |
| Wheel Cover Type | — | Full |
| Wheel Size | — | 16 x 6.5 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | Independent |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | — | 2 yr./ 24000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Maverick and 2025 Nissan Kicks.
How much more fuel-efficient is the Maverick compared to the Kicks?
The 2025 Ford Maverick is considerably more efficient, posting a 38 combined MPG rating. This is a notable 7 MPG improvement over the 2025 Nissan Kicks, which achieves 31 combined MPG.
What is the horsepower difference between these two crossovers?
The Maverick delivers substantially more power with 191 hp, while the Kicks offers 141 hp. This 50 hp difference means the Maverick will feel much peppier when merging or passing.
Is the price difference between the two vehicles significant?
Yes, the price gap is substantial; the Maverick starts at $28,145, making it $6,315 more expensive than the Kicks' entry price of $21,830.
Which vehicle is physically smaller for easier city driving?
The 2025 Nissan Kicks is the smaller vehicle, measuring 171.9 inches in length compared to the Maverick’s 199.8 inches. The Kicks is also slightly narrower and shorter overall.
Does the Kicks offer competitive cargo space given its smaller footprint?
Yes, the Kicks manages to fit 30 cubic feet of cargo capacity, which is quite generous for its compact dimensions.
Are both vehicles capable of using cheaper fuel?
Fortunately, both the 2025 Ford Maverick and the 2025 Nissan Kicks are designed to run on regular unleaded fuel, saving owners money at the pump.
More Budget SUVs Under $30,000
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool