2025 Ford Maverick vs 2025 Mazda CX-30
Comparison Overview
The most significant metric difference between the 2025 Ford Maverick and the 2025 Mazda CX-30 is fuel economy, with the Maverick achieving a 38 combined MPG versus the CX-30's 29 combined MPGโa difference of 9 MPG. While both vehicles share an identical 191 horsepower output, the CX-30 produces a notably higher 186 lb-ft of torque compared to the Maverick's 155 lb-ft. Pricewise, the CX-30 holds an edge with an MSRP of $25,195 against the Maverick's $28,145. Dimensionally, the Maverick is significantly larger at 199.8 inches long and 68.8 inches tall, whereas the CX-30 is more compact at 173.0 inches long. Furthermore, the CX-30 offers a defined cargo capacity of 20.2 cu ft, a metric not explicitly detailed for the Maverick crossover body style.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Ford Maverick
The 2025 Ford Maverick wins for commuters due to its superior 38 combined MPG rating.
2025 Mazda CX-30
The 2025 Mazda CX-30 is better suited for families based on its standard All-Wheel Drive and defined 20.2 cu ft cargo capacity.
2025 Mazda CX-30
The 2025 Mazda CX-30 is favored by enthusiasts due to its 186 lb-ft of torque and 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission.
2025 Mazda CX-30
The 2025 Mazda CX-30 offers better baseline value with a lower MSRP of $25,195 compared to the Maverick's $28,145.
Choose the Ford Maverick if...
- Maximum fuel efficiency is prioritized, delivering 38 combined MPG.
- A larger physical footprint is needed, measuring 199.8 inches in length.
- The user requires a front-wheel-drive configuration using a standard engine setup.
Choose the Mazda CX-30 if...
- A higher torque figure of 186 lb-ft is desired for quicker initial responsiveness.
- Standard All-Wheel Drive capability is a non-negotiable requirement.
- The budget is firm, with an MSRP that is $2,950 less than the competitor at $25,195.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Maverick | Mazda CX-30 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 199.8" | 173.0" |
| Width | 72.6" | 70.7" |
| Height | 68.8" | 61.7" |
| Wheelbase | 121.1" | 104.4" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | โ | โ |
| Front Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Rear Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | โ | โ |
| Electronic Stability Control | โ | โ |
| Traction Control System | โ | โ |
| LATCH System | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | โ | โ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Brake Preparation System | โ | โ |
| Brake Assist | โ | โ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | โ | โ |
| Automatic Headlights | โ | โ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | โ | โ |
| LED Headlights | โ | โ |
| Daytime Running Lights | โ | โ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | โ | โ |
| Engine Immobilizer | โ | โ |
| Blind Spot Monitor | โ | โ |
| Lane Departure Warning | โ | โ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | โ | โ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | โ | โ |
| Driver Attention Alert | โ | โ |
| Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags | โ | โ |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.5 L | 2.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | hybrid | gas |
| Horsepower | 191 hp @ 5600 rpm | 191 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 155 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 186 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | โ | โ |
| Cylinder Deactivation | โ | โ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | electrically variable-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | front wheel drive | all wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 42/35 MPG | 26/33 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 38 MPG | 29 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 579.6/483.0 mi. | 330.2/419.1 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 13.8 gal. | 12.7 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Electric Power Steering | โ | โ |
| Rear View Camera | โ | โ |
| Cruise Control | โ | โ |
| Front Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Rear Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Front Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | โ | โ |
| Front Seatback Storage | โ | โ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Interior Air Filtration | โ | โ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Push Button Start | โ | โ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | โ | โ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 13.2 in | 8.8 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | โ | โ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 6 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | โ | โ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | โ | โ |
| USB Port | โ | โ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | โ | โ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 1 | 4 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | โ | โ |
| Heated Mirrors | โ | โ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 40.2 in. | 38.1 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 42.8 in. | 41.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.3 in. | 55.6 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 55.4 in. | 54.6 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | โ | โ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | โ | โ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | โ | โ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.6 in. | 38.3 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 35.9 in. | 36.3 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 55.6 in. | 53.6 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 54.1 in. | 53.2 in. |
| Folding Rear Seatback | โ | โ |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | โ | โ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | โ | โ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Steel | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Diameter | 17 in | โ |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 225/65R17 | 215/65R16 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Underbody Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Size | โ | 16 x 6.5 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | Independent |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Maverick and 2025 Mazda CX-30.
What is the primary performance difference between the 2025 Maverick and the 2025 CX-30?
Both vehicles produce an identical 191 horsepower, but the Mazda CX-30 generates significantly more twisting force with 186 lb-ft of torque, while the Maverick produces only 155 lb-ft.
How much more efficient is the 2025 Ford Maverick?
The Maverick achieves a 9 MPG advantage in combined driving (38 MPG vs. 29 MPG for the CX-30). Specifically, the Maverick pulls ahead dramatically in city driving, rated at 42 MPG versus the CX-30โs 26 MPG.
Which vehicle is cheaper to purchase initially?
The 2025 Mazda CX-30 carries a lower base MSRP of $25,195, making it $2,950 more affordable upfront than the 2025 Ford Maverick's $28,145 price tag.
Are there significant differences in size and utility between the two crossovers?
Yes, the Maverick is considerably larger (199.8 inches long vs. 173.0 inches for the CX-30) and taller (68.8 inches vs. 61.7 inches). The CX-30 specifies 20.2 cu ft of cargo capacity, which suggests a focus on contained storage over the Maverick's crossover dimensions.
What drivetrain layouts define these two vehicles?
The 2025 Ford Maverick comes standard with front-wheel drive mated to an electrically variable-speed automatic transmission. Conversely, the 2025 Mazda CX-30 includes All-Wheel Drive paired with a more traditional 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission.
Does the type of gasoline impact either vehicle?
No, both the 2025 Ford Maverick and the 2025 Mazda CX-30 are engineered to run on regular unleaded fuel.
More Budget SUVs Under $30,000
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool